Predictive Power of X-ray Chest Findings in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma Lung

Background: To define relationship of chest x-ray abnormality with the diagnosis of lung cancer with a view to identify those at high risk of lung cancer. Methods: In this descriptive study patients with suspicion of lung cancer , were included. Chest x-ray findings and final diagnosis of all the pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kaleem Ullah Toori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2014-12-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/324
_version_ 1811296084385857536
author Kaleem Ullah Toori
author_facet Kaleem Ullah Toori
author_sort Kaleem Ullah Toori
collection DOAJ
description Background: To define relationship of chest x-ray abnormality with the diagnosis of lung cancer with a view to identify those at high risk of lung cancer. Methods: In this descriptive study patients with suspicion of lung cancer , were included. Chest x-ray findings and final diagnosis of all the patients were recorded. All patients had contrast enhanced chest CT-scan and bronchoscopic evaluation by the chest physician. Patients with peripheral lung lesions had CT guided lung biopsy. Open lung biopsy was organized for patients with lung lesions not approachable bronchoscopically and not suitable for CT-guided lung biopsy. Final diagnosis was recorded and patients were identified as having lung cancer or not on the basis of tissue biopsy. Patients with major systemic diseases including neurological disorders, cardiovascular disease, endocrine and autoimmune disease or diseases related to gastrointestinal, renal, haematological, dermatological or musculoskeletal system were excluded. Results: Out of 701 patients 45% were found to have lung cancer. Univariate analysis demonstrated that mass lesion was significantly more common in lung cancer and findings of normal x-ray, prominent hilum and fibrotic shadow significantly were less common (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed mass lesion as strong predictor, and normal chest x-ray and fibrotic shadows as powerful negative predictors of lung cancer (p<0.05). Conclusion: Chest x-ray interpreted by an experienced radiologist as abnormal is neither a sensitive nor a specific tool to predict lung cancer except if a mass lesion is identified
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:43:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-858689ac17514041b4dc833d14602edb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:43:05Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
record_format Article
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
spelling doaj.art-858689ac17514041b4dc833d14602edb2022-12-22T03:00:02ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702014-12-01182Predictive Power of X-ray Chest Findings in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma LungKaleem Ullah Toori0Department of Pulmonolgy, KRL General Hospital, IslamabadBackground: To define relationship of chest x-ray abnormality with the diagnosis of lung cancer with a view to identify those at high risk of lung cancer. Methods: In this descriptive study patients with suspicion of lung cancer , were included. Chest x-ray findings and final diagnosis of all the patients were recorded. All patients had contrast enhanced chest CT-scan and bronchoscopic evaluation by the chest physician. Patients with peripheral lung lesions had CT guided lung biopsy. Open lung biopsy was organized for patients with lung lesions not approachable bronchoscopically and not suitable for CT-guided lung biopsy. Final diagnosis was recorded and patients were identified as having lung cancer or not on the basis of tissue biopsy. Patients with major systemic diseases including neurological disorders, cardiovascular disease, endocrine and autoimmune disease or diseases related to gastrointestinal, renal, haematological, dermatological or musculoskeletal system were excluded. Results: Out of 701 patients 45% were found to have lung cancer. Univariate analysis demonstrated that mass lesion was significantly more common in lung cancer and findings of normal x-ray, prominent hilum and fibrotic shadow significantly were less common (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed mass lesion as strong predictor, and normal chest x-ray and fibrotic shadows as powerful negative predictors of lung cancer (p<0.05). Conclusion: Chest x-ray interpreted by an experienced radiologist as abnormal is neither a sensitive nor a specific tool to predict lung cancer except if a mass lesion is identifiedhttps://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/324Lungcancerchest x-ray.
spellingShingle Kaleem Ullah Toori
Predictive Power of X-ray Chest Findings in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma Lung
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Lung
cancer
chest x-ray.
title Predictive Power of X-ray Chest Findings in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma Lung
title_full Predictive Power of X-ray Chest Findings in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma Lung
title_fullStr Predictive Power of X-ray Chest Findings in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma Lung
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Power of X-ray Chest Findings in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma Lung
title_short Predictive Power of X-ray Chest Findings in the Diagnosis of Carcinoma Lung
title_sort predictive power of x ray chest findings in the diagnosis of carcinoma lung
topic Lung
cancer
chest x-ray.
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/324
work_keys_str_mv AT kaleemullahtoori predictivepowerofxraychestfindingsinthediagnosisofcarcinomalung