Clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application: a case study

<p><strong>Background</strong> UK primary care physicians receive their laboratory test results electronically. This study reports a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system error in the pathology test request date that went unnoticed in family practices.</p><p>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amber Appleton, Khaled Sadek, Ian GJ Dawson, Simon de Lusignan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2013-09-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/13
_version_ 1818480865660895232
author Amber Appleton
Khaled Sadek
Ian GJ Dawson
Simon de Lusignan
author_facet Amber Appleton
Khaled Sadek
Ian GJ Dawson
Simon de Lusignan
author_sort Amber Appleton
collection DOAJ
description <p><strong>Background</strong> UK primary care physicians receive their laboratory test results electronically. This study reports a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system error in the pathology test request date that went unnoticed in family practices.</p><p><strong>Method</strong> We conducted a case study using a causation of risk theoretical framework; comprising interviews with clinicians and the manufacturer to explore the identification of and reaction to the error. The primary outcome was the evolution and  recognition of and response to the problem. The secondary outcome was to identify other issues with this system noted by users.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> The problem was defined as the incorrect logging of test dates ordered through a CPOE system. The system assigned the test request date to the results, hence a blood test taken after a therapeutic intervention (e.g. an increase in cholesterol-lowering therapy) would appear in the computerised medical record as though it had been tested prior to the increase in treatment. This case demonstrates that: the manufacturers failed to understand family physician workflow; regulation of medical software did not prevent the error; and inherent user trust in technology exacerbated this problem. It took three months before users in two practices independently noted the date errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> This case illustrates how users take software on trust and suppliers fail to make provision for risks associated with new software. Resulting errors led to inappropriate prescribing, follow-up, costs and risk. The evaluation of such devices should include utilising risk management processes (RMP) to minimise and manage potential risk.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T11:27:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8586d320363d44dda4aac063eceada25
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2058-4555
2058-4563
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T11:27:56Z
publishDate 2013-09-01
publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
record_format Article
series Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
spelling doaj.art-8586d320363d44dda4aac063eceada252022-12-22T01:50:41ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632013-09-0120424124710.14236/jhi.v20i4.134Clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application: a case studyAmber Appleton0Khaled Sadek1Ian GJ Dawson2Simon de Lusignan3Department of Health Care Management and Policy, University of Surrey, GuildfordDepartment of Health Care Management and Policy, University of Surrey, Guildford,Lecturer in Risk Management, Southampton Management School, University of Southampton,Department of Health Care Management and Policy, University of Surrey, Guildford<p><strong>Background</strong> UK primary care physicians receive their laboratory test results electronically. This study reports a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system error in the pathology test request date that went unnoticed in family practices.</p><p><strong>Method</strong> We conducted a case study using a causation of risk theoretical framework; comprising interviews with clinicians and the manufacturer to explore the identification of and reaction to the error. The primary outcome was the evolution and  recognition of and response to the problem. The secondary outcome was to identify other issues with this system noted by users.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> The problem was defined as the incorrect logging of test dates ordered through a CPOE system. The system assigned the test request date to the results, hence a blood test taken after a therapeutic intervention (e.g. an increase in cholesterol-lowering therapy) would appear in the computerised medical record as though it had been tested prior to the increase in treatment. This case demonstrates that: the manufacturers failed to understand family physician workflow; regulation of medical software did not prevent the error; and inherent user trust in technology exacerbated this problem. It took three months before users in two practices independently noted the date errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> This case illustrates how users take software on trust and suppliers fail to make provision for risks associated with new software. Resulting errors led to inappropriate prescribing, follow-up, costs and risk. The evaluation of such devices should include utilising risk management processes (RMP) to minimise and manage potential risk.</p>http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/13computerised medical records systemsgeneral practicemedical informaticsmedical order entry systemssafety management
spellingShingle Amber Appleton
Khaled Sadek
Ian GJ Dawson
Simon de Lusignan
Clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application: a case study
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
computerised medical records systems
general practice
medical informatics
medical order entry systems
safety management
title Clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application: a case study
title_full Clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application: a case study
title_fullStr Clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application: a case study
title_short Clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application: a case study
title_sort clinicians were oblivious to incorrect logging of test dates and the associated risks in an online pathology application a case study
topic computerised medical records systems
general practice
medical informatics
medical order entry systems
safety management
url http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/13
work_keys_str_mv AT amberappleton clinicianswereoblivioustoincorrectloggingoftestdatesandtheassociatedrisksinanonlinepathologyapplicationacasestudy
AT khaledsadek clinicianswereoblivioustoincorrectloggingoftestdatesandtheassociatedrisksinanonlinepathologyapplicationacasestudy
AT iangjdawson clinicianswereoblivioustoincorrectloggingoftestdatesandtheassociatedrisksinanonlinepathologyapplicationacasestudy
AT simondelusignan clinicianswereoblivioustoincorrectloggingoftestdatesandtheassociatedrisksinanonlinepathologyapplicationacasestudy