Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Blood-based cardioplegia is the standard myocardial protection strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery. Custadiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate), an alternative, may have some advantages but is potentially less effective at myocardial protection. This study aimed to test whet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed F. Elmahrouk, Mohammad S. Shihata, Osman O. AL-Radi, Amr A. Arafat, Musleh Altowaity, Bayan A. Alshaikh, Mohamed N. Galal, Abdulbadee A. Bogis, Haneen Y. Al Omar, Wesal J. Assiri, Ahmed A. Jamjoom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-10-01
Series:European Journal of Medical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01372-4
_version_ 1797577246135812096
author Ahmed F. Elmahrouk
Mohammad S. Shihata
Osman O. AL-Radi
Amr A. Arafat
Musleh Altowaity
Bayan A. Alshaikh
Mohamed N. Galal
Abdulbadee A. Bogis
Haneen Y. Al Omar
Wesal J. Assiri
Ahmed A. Jamjoom
author_facet Ahmed F. Elmahrouk
Mohammad S. Shihata
Osman O. AL-Radi
Amr A. Arafat
Musleh Altowaity
Bayan A. Alshaikh
Mohamed N. Galal
Abdulbadee A. Bogis
Haneen Y. Al Omar
Wesal J. Assiri
Ahmed A. Jamjoom
author_sort Ahmed F. Elmahrouk
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Blood-based cardioplegia is the standard myocardial protection strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery. Custadiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate), an alternative, may have some advantages but is potentially less effective at myocardial protection. This study aimed to test whether custadiol is not inferior to blood-based cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery. Methods The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with a blinded outcome assessment. All pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia, including neonates, were eligible. Emergency surgery was excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of death within 30 days, an ICU stay longer than 5 days, or arrhythmia requiring intervention. Secondary endpoints included total hospital stay, inotropic score, cardiac troponin levels, ventricular function, and extended survival postdischarge. The sample size was determined a priori for a noninferiority design with an expected primary outcome of 40% and a clinical significance difference of 20%. Results Between January 2018 and January 2021, 226 patients, divided into the Custodiol cardioplegia (CC) group (n = 107) and the blood cardioplegia (BC) group (n = 119), completed the study protocol. There was no difference in the composite endpoint between the CC and BC groups, 65 (60.75%) vs. 71 (59.66%), respectively (P = 0.87). The total length of stay in the hospital was 14 (Q2–Q3: 10–19) days in the CC group vs. 13 (10–21) days in the BC group (P = 0.85). The inotropic score was not significantly different between the CC and BC groups, 5 (2.6–7.45) vs. 5 (2.6–7.5), respectively (P = 0.82). The cardiac troponin level and ventricular function did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.34 and P = 0.85, respectively). The median duration of follow-up was 32.75 (Q2–Q3: 18.73–41.53) months, and there was no difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.55). Conclusions Custodial cardioplegia is not inferior to blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection in pediatric patients. Trial registration The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, and the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier number is NCT03082716 Date: 17/03/2017
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:06:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-858814b56a2d414e8771c0aad3f8d4e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-783X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:06:26Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series European Journal of Medical Research
spelling doaj.art-858814b56a2d414e8771c0aad3f8d4e22023-11-19T12:47:27ZengBMCEuropean Journal of Medical Research2047-783X2023-10-012811710.1186/s40001-023-01372-4Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trialAhmed F. Elmahrouk0Mohammad S. Shihata1Osman O. AL-Radi2Amr A. Arafat3Musleh Altowaity4Bayan A. Alshaikh5Mohamed N. Galal6Abdulbadee A. Bogis7Haneen Y. Al Omar8Wesal J. Assiri9Ahmed A. Jamjoom10Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre,Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre,Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre,Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Tanta UniversityCardiothoracic Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre,Cardiac Surgery Department, King Fahad Armed Forces HospitalPediatric Cardiac Surgery Department, King Fahad Armed Forces HospitalCardiothoracic Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre,Research Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research CentreDepartment of Nursing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research CentreCardiothoracic Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre,Abstract Background Blood-based cardioplegia is the standard myocardial protection strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery. Custadiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate), an alternative, may have some advantages but is potentially less effective at myocardial protection. This study aimed to test whether custadiol is not inferior to blood-based cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery. Methods The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with a blinded outcome assessment. All pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia, including neonates, were eligible. Emergency surgery was excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of death within 30 days, an ICU stay longer than 5 days, or arrhythmia requiring intervention. Secondary endpoints included total hospital stay, inotropic score, cardiac troponin levels, ventricular function, and extended survival postdischarge. The sample size was determined a priori for a noninferiority design with an expected primary outcome of 40% and a clinical significance difference of 20%. Results Between January 2018 and January 2021, 226 patients, divided into the Custodiol cardioplegia (CC) group (n = 107) and the blood cardioplegia (BC) group (n = 119), completed the study protocol. There was no difference in the composite endpoint between the CC and BC groups, 65 (60.75%) vs. 71 (59.66%), respectively (P = 0.87). The total length of stay in the hospital was 14 (Q2–Q3: 10–19) days in the CC group vs. 13 (10–21) days in the BC group (P = 0.85). The inotropic score was not significantly different between the CC and BC groups, 5 (2.6–7.45) vs. 5 (2.6–7.5), respectively (P = 0.82). The cardiac troponin level and ventricular function did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.34 and P = 0.85, respectively). The median duration of follow-up was 32.75 (Q2–Q3: 18.73–41.53) months, and there was no difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.55). Conclusions Custodial cardioplegia is not inferior to blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection in pediatric patients. Trial registration The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, and the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier number is NCT03082716 Date: 17/03/2017https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01372-4CardioplegiaCustadiolBlood cardioplegiaHistidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate
spellingShingle Ahmed F. Elmahrouk
Mohammad S. Shihata
Osman O. AL-Radi
Amr A. Arafat
Musleh Altowaity
Bayan A. Alshaikh
Mohamed N. Galal
Abdulbadee A. Bogis
Haneen Y. Al Omar
Wesal J. Assiri
Ahmed A. Jamjoom
Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial
European Journal of Medical Research
Cardioplegia
Custadiol
Blood cardioplegia
Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate
title Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery a randomized controlled trial
topic Cardioplegia
Custadiol
Blood cardioplegia
Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01372-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedfelmahrouk custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohammadsshihata custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT osmanoalradi custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT amraarafat custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muslehaltowaity custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bayanaalshaikh custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohamedngalal custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abdulbadeeabogis custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haneenyalomar custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wesaljassiri custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahmedajamjoom custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiainpediatriccardiacsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial