Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation

Abstract Background The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures is commonly affected by implant-related complications. We evaluated the functional and radiographic results of transosseous suture fixation in a series of displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHF). Methods Sixty-four...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Miquel, R. Martínez, F. Santana, P. Marimon, C. Torrens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02555-7
_version_ 1811212755976323072
author J. Miquel
R. Martínez
F. Santana
P. Marimon
C. Torrens
author_facet J. Miquel
R. Martínez
F. Santana
P. Marimon
C. Torrens
author_sort J. Miquel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures is commonly affected by implant-related complications. We evaluated the functional and radiographic results of transosseous suture fixation in a series of displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHF). Methods Sixty-four patients were retrospectively classified by age, sex, and the Neer fracture classification. Two-part greater tuberosity (2pGT) displaced fractures and 3-part (varus and valgus) and 4-part valgus impacted fractures were managed with fragment reduction and transosseous suture fixation. Patients with minimum follow-up of 24 months and assessed with the Constant-Murley score (CMS) were included. Radiological and medical complications, as well as reinterventions were also recorded. Results Forty-six patients with a mean follow-up of 58 (24–132) and a mean age of 58 years old were analyzed. Patients with 2pGT (n = 10) fractures had a CMS of 76 points (59–89); patients with 3-part fractures (n = 22) had a score of 67 points (13–91); and those with 4-part fractures (n = 14) had a score of 64 (24–76) points. The overall complication rate was 6 out of 46, and 4 patients required reintervention for different reasons. Patients presenting with 3-part varus fractures had significantly lower functional outcomes scores (p = 0.007). Humeral head osteonecrosis was present in 9 patients and significantly affected the functional outcomes (p < 0.05). However, only three out of nine patients with osteonecrosis required subsequent surgery at the indicated follow-up. Conclusions The fracture reduction and transosseous fixation technique represents a safe technique with low complication and reintervention rates. The presence of humeral head necrosis did not lead to subsequent surgical intervention because no hardware had protruded. Level of evidence Level IV, retrospective study
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:35:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-859fd593c7ac4b2fa657a12988a730aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:35:42Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-859fd593c7ac4b2fa657a12988a730aa2022-12-22T03:45:53ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2021-06-011611710.1186/s13018-021-02555-7Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixationJ. Miquel0R. Martínez1F. Santana2P. Marimon3C. Torrens4Corporació Sanitària Parc TaulíConsorci Sanitari de l’AnoiaParc de Salut MarConsorci Sanitari de l’AnoiaParc de Salut MarAbstract Background The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures is commonly affected by implant-related complications. We evaluated the functional and radiographic results of transosseous suture fixation in a series of displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHF). Methods Sixty-four patients were retrospectively classified by age, sex, and the Neer fracture classification. Two-part greater tuberosity (2pGT) displaced fractures and 3-part (varus and valgus) and 4-part valgus impacted fractures were managed with fragment reduction and transosseous suture fixation. Patients with minimum follow-up of 24 months and assessed with the Constant-Murley score (CMS) were included. Radiological and medical complications, as well as reinterventions were also recorded. Results Forty-six patients with a mean follow-up of 58 (24–132) and a mean age of 58 years old were analyzed. Patients with 2pGT (n = 10) fractures had a CMS of 76 points (59–89); patients with 3-part fractures (n = 22) had a score of 67 points (13–91); and those with 4-part fractures (n = 14) had a score of 64 (24–76) points. The overall complication rate was 6 out of 46, and 4 patients required reintervention for different reasons. Patients presenting with 3-part varus fractures had significantly lower functional outcomes scores (p = 0.007). Humeral head osteonecrosis was present in 9 patients and significantly affected the functional outcomes (p < 0.05). However, only three out of nine patients with osteonecrosis required subsequent surgery at the indicated follow-up. Conclusions The fracture reduction and transosseous fixation technique represents a safe technique with low complication and reintervention rates. The presence of humeral head necrosis did not lead to subsequent surgical intervention because no hardware had protruded. Level of evidence Level IV, retrospective studyhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02555-7Proximal humeral fracturesTransosseous fixationOpen reduction and internal fixation
spellingShingle J. Miquel
R. Martínez
F. Santana
P. Marimon
C. Torrens
Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Proximal humeral fractures
Transosseous fixation
Open reduction and internal fixation
title Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation
title_full Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation
title_fullStr Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation
title_short Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation
title_sort surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation
topic Proximal humeral fractures
Transosseous fixation
Open reduction and internal fixation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02555-7
work_keys_str_mv AT jmiquel surgicaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfractureswiththetransosseoussuturefixation
AT rmartinez surgicaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfractureswiththetransosseoussuturefixation
AT fsantana surgicaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfractureswiththetransosseoussuturefixation
AT pmarimon surgicaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfractureswiththetransosseoussuturefixation
AT ctorrens surgicaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfractureswiththetransosseoussuturefixation