Free Fallin’? The decline in evidence-based decision-making by Canada’s protected areas managers

The conservation of biodiversity requires various forms of evidence to ensure effective outcomes. In this study, we provide an updated assessment of the state of evidence-based decision-making in Canada’s protected areas organizations by examining practitioner perceptions of: (i) the value and use o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher J. Lemieux, Elizabeth A. Halpenny, Trevor Swerdfager, Mu He, A. Joyce Gould, Don Carruthers Den Hoed, Jill Bueddefeld, Glen T. Hvenegaard, Brian Joubert, Rick Rollins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:FACETS
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0085
_version_ 1831763846423904256
author Christopher J. Lemieux
Elizabeth A. Halpenny
Trevor Swerdfager
Mu He
A. Joyce Gould
Don Carruthers Den Hoed
Jill Bueddefeld
Glen T. Hvenegaard
Brian Joubert
Rick Rollins
author_facet Christopher J. Lemieux
Elizabeth A. Halpenny
Trevor Swerdfager
Mu He
A. Joyce Gould
Don Carruthers Den Hoed
Jill Bueddefeld
Glen T. Hvenegaard
Brian Joubert
Rick Rollins
author_sort Christopher J. Lemieux
collection DOAJ
description The conservation of biodiversity requires various forms of evidence to ensure effective outcomes. In this study, we provide an updated assessment of the state of evidence-based decision-making in Canada’s protected areas organizations by examining practitioner perceptions of: (i) the value and use of various forms of evidence, (ii) the availability of evidence to support decisions, and (iii) the extent to which various institutional and behavioural barriers influence the use of evidence. Our results compare national surveys conducted in 2019 and 2013, revealing a significant and concerning decline in the use of all forms of evidence. We found significant declines in the use of peer-reviewed literature, local knowledge, and Indigenous knowledge. Our results correspondingly demonstrate a host of systemic barriers to the effective use of evidence, including a lack of trust, how to deal with uncertainty, and limited training. These challenges persist at a time when the quantity of information is greater than ever, and recognition of the value of Indigenous knowledge is relatively high (and increasing). Leadership is required to cultivate more relevant evidence, to embed scientists and Indigenous Knowledge-Holders in conservation organizations, to (re)establishing knowledge sharing forums, and to establish accountability and reporting measures to support efforts aimed at effectively achieving Canada’s biodiversity conservation goals.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T05:32:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-85a0461b64cf48b9a8b79c6517b0ced6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2371-1671
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T05:32:43Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
record_format Article
series FACETS
spelling doaj.art-85a0461b64cf48b9a8b79c6517b0ced62022-12-21T18:37:24ZengCanadian Science PublishingFACETS2371-16712021-01-016164066410.1139/facets-2020-0085Free Fallin’? The decline in evidence-based decision-making by Canada’s protected areas managersChristopher J. Lemieux0Elizabeth A. Halpenny1Trevor Swerdfager2Mu He3A. Joyce Gould4Don Carruthers Den Hoed5Jill Bueddefeld6Glen T. Hvenegaard7Brian Joubert8Rick Rollins9Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, CanadaFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H9, CanadaSchool of Environment and Resource Studies, Faculty of Environment, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H9, CanadaOffice of the Chief Scientist, Parks Division, Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB T5J 5C6, CanadaUniversity of British Columbia/Canadian Parks Collective for Innovation and Leadership (CPCIL), Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, CanadaDepartment of Geography & Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, CanadaAugustana Faculty and Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H9, CanadaParks Operations Division, Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB T5J 5C6, CanadaRecreation and Tourism, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, BC V9R 5S5, CanadaThe conservation of biodiversity requires various forms of evidence to ensure effective outcomes. In this study, we provide an updated assessment of the state of evidence-based decision-making in Canada’s protected areas organizations by examining practitioner perceptions of: (i) the value and use of various forms of evidence, (ii) the availability of evidence to support decisions, and (iii) the extent to which various institutional and behavioural barriers influence the use of evidence. Our results compare national surveys conducted in 2019 and 2013, revealing a significant and concerning decline in the use of all forms of evidence. We found significant declines in the use of peer-reviewed literature, local knowledge, and Indigenous knowledge. Our results correspondingly demonstrate a host of systemic barriers to the effective use of evidence, including a lack of trust, how to deal with uncertainty, and limited training. These challenges persist at a time when the quantity of information is greater than ever, and recognition of the value of Indigenous knowledge is relatively high (and increasing). Leadership is required to cultivate more relevant evidence, to embed scientists and Indigenous Knowledge-Holders in conservation organizations, to (re)establishing knowledge sharing forums, and to establish accountability and reporting measures to support efforts aimed at effectively achieving Canada’s biodiversity conservation goals.https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0085evidenceknowledgemanagementbiodiversityconservationdecision-making
spellingShingle Christopher J. Lemieux
Elizabeth A. Halpenny
Trevor Swerdfager
Mu He
A. Joyce Gould
Don Carruthers Den Hoed
Jill Bueddefeld
Glen T. Hvenegaard
Brian Joubert
Rick Rollins
Free Fallin’? The decline in evidence-based decision-making by Canada’s protected areas managers
FACETS
evidence
knowledge
management
biodiversity
conservation
decision-making
title Free Fallin’? The decline in evidence-based decision-making by Canada’s protected areas managers
title_full Free Fallin’? The decline in evidence-based decision-making by Canada’s protected areas managers
title_fullStr Free Fallin’? The decline in evidence-based decision-making by Canada’s protected areas managers
title_full_unstemmed Free Fallin’? The decline in evidence-based decision-making by Canada’s protected areas managers
title_short Free Fallin’? The decline in evidence-based decision-making by Canada’s protected areas managers
title_sort free fallin the decline in evidence based decision making by canada s protected areas managers
topic evidence
knowledge
management
biodiversity
conservation
decision-making
url https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0085
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherjlemieux freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT elizabethahalpenny freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT trevorswerdfager freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT muhe freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT ajoycegould freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT doncarruthersdenhoed freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT jillbueddefeld freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT glenthvenegaard freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT brianjoubert freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers
AT rickrollins freefallinthedeclineinevidencebaseddecisionmakingbycanadasprotectedareasmanagers