Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making

Previous research has established that higher levels of trait Honesty-Humility (HH) are associated with less dishonest behavior in cheating paradigms. However, only imprecise effect size estimates of this HH-cheating link are available. Moreover, evidence is inconclusive on whether other basic perso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel W. Heck, Isabel Thielmann, Morten Moshagen, Benjamin E. Hilbig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2018-07-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009232/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797697903949512704
author Daniel W. Heck
Isabel Thielmann
Morten Moshagen
Benjamin E. Hilbig
author_facet Daniel W. Heck
Isabel Thielmann
Morten Moshagen
Benjamin E. Hilbig
author_sort Daniel W. Heck
collection DOAJ
description Previous research has established that higher levels of trait Honesty-Humility (HH) are associated with less dishonest behavior in cheating paradigms. However, only imprecise effect size estimates of this HH-cheating link are available. Moreover, evidence is inconclusive on whether other basic personality traits from the HEXACO or Big Five models are associated with unethical decision making and whether such effects have incremental validity beyond HH. We address these issues in a highly powered reanalysis of 16 studies assessing dishonest behavior in an incentivized, one-shot cheating paradigm (N = 5,002). For this purpose, we rely on a newly developed logistic regression approach for the analysis of nested data in cheating paradigms. We also test theoretically derived interactions of HH with other basic personality traits (i.e., Emotionality and Conscientiousness) and situational factors (i.e., the baseline probability of observing a favorable outcome) as well as the incremental validity of HH over demographic characteristics. The results show a medium to large effect of HH (odds ratio = 0.53), which was independent of other personality, situational, or demographic variables. Only one other trait (Big Five Agreeableness) was associated with unethical decision making, although it failed to show any incremental validity beyond HH.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:46:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-85e4d97d2a1a495691fbfddbb2840885
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:46:36Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-85e4d97d2a1a495691fbfddbb28408852023-09-03T12:44:18ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752018-07-011335637110.1017/S1930297500009232Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision makingDaniel W. Heck0Isabel Thielmann1Morten Moshagen2Benjamin E. Hilbig3Statistical Modeling in Psychology, University of Mannheim, B6, 30–32 (room 313), 68159, Mannheim, GermanyUniversity of Koblenz-LandauUlm UniversityUniversity of Koblenz-LandauPrevious research has established that higher levels of trait Honesty-Humility (HH) are associated with less dishonest behavior in cheating paradigms. However, only imprecise effect size estimates of this HH-cheating link are available. Moreover, evidence is inconclusive on whether other basic personality traits from the HEXACO or Big Five models are associated with unethical decision making and whether such effects have incremental validity beyond HH. We address these issues in a highly powered reanalysis of 16 studies assessing dishonest behavior in an incentivized, one-shot cheating paradigm (N = 5,002). For this purpose, we rely on a newly developed logistic regression approach for the analysis of nested data in cheating paradigms. We also test theoretically derived interactions of HH with other basic personality traits (i.e., Emotionality and Conscientiousness) and situational factors (i.e., the baseline probability of observing a favorable outcome) as well as the incremental validity of HH over demographic characteristics. The results show a medium to large effect of HH (odds ratio = 0.53), which was independent of other personality, situational, or demographic variables. Only one other trait (Big Five Agreeableness) was associated with unethical decision making, although it failed to show any incremental validity beyond HH.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009232/type/journal_articlecheatingdishonestylogistic regressionHEXACO Honesty-HumilityBig Five
spellingShingle Daniel W. Heck
Isabel Thielmann
Morten Moshagen
Benjamin E. Hilbig
Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
Judgment and Decision Making
cheating
dishonesty
logistic regression
HEXACO Honesty-Humility
Big Five
title Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
title_full Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
title_fullStr Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
title_full_unstemmed Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
title_short Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
title_sort who lies a large scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making
topic cheating
dishonesty
logistic regression
HEXACO Honesty-Humility
Big Five
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009232/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT danielwheck wholiesalargescalereanalysislinkingbasicpersonalitytraitstounethicaldecisionmaking
AT isabelthielmann wholiesalargescalereanalysislinkingbasicpersonalitytraitstounethicaldecisionmaking
AT mortenmoshagen wholiesalargescalereanalysislinkingbasicpersonalitytraitstounethicaldecisionmaking
AT benjaminehilbig wholiesalargescalereanalysislinkingbasicpersonalitytraitstounethicaldecisionmaking