Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?

The Mott problem is a simpler version of the quantum measurement problem that asks: Is there a microscopic physical mechanism – based (explicitly or implicitly) only on Schroedinger’s equation – that explains why a single alpha particle emitted in a single spherically symmetric s-wave nuclear decay...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schonfeld Jonathan F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2023-10-01
Series:Open Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2023-0125
_version_ 1797646316422037504
author Schonfeld Jonathan F.
author_facet Schonfeld Jonathan F.
author_sort Schonfeld Jonathan F.
collection DOAJ
description The Mott problem is a simpler version of the quantum measurement problem that asks: Is there a microscopic physical mechanism – based (explicitly or implicitly) only on Schroedinger’s equation – that explains why a single alpha particle emitted in a single spherically symmetric s-wave nuclear decay produces a manifestly nonspherically symmetric single track in a cloud chamber? I attempt here to generalize earlier work that formulated such a mechanism. The key ingredient there was identification of sites at which the cross section for ionization by a passing charged particle is near singular at ionization threshold. This near singularity arose from a Penning-like process involving molecular polarization in subcritical vapor clusters. Here, I argue that the same Mott problem question should be asked about Geiger counters. I then define a simple experiment to determine if ionization physics similar to the cloud chamber case takes place in the mica window of a Geiger counter and explains the collimation of wavefunctions that are spherically symmetric outside the counter into linear ion tracks inside. The experiment measures the count rate from a radioactive point source as a function of source-window separation. I have performed a proof of concept of this experiment; results are reported here and support the near-singular-ionization picture. These results are significant in their own right, and they may shed light on physical mechanisms underlying instances of the full quantum measurement problem. I illustrate this for the Stern–Gerlach experiment and a particular realization of superconducting qubits. I conclude by detailing further work required to flesh out these results more rigorously.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:59:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-85e5a2b110bd4341bfb5b77815d4cc56
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-5471
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:59:52Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Physics
spelling doaj.art-85e5a2b110bd4341bfb5b77815d4cc562023-10-30T07:59:15ZengDe GruyterOpen Physics2391-54712023-10-012116712010.1515/phys-2023-0125Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?Schonfeld Jonathan F.0Center for Astrophysics, Harvard and Smithsonian 60, Garden St., CambridgeMA 02138, United States of AmericaThe Mott problem is a simpler version of the quantum measurement problem that asks: Is there a microscopic physical mechanism – based (explicitly or implicitly) only on Schroedinger’s equation – that explains why a single alpha particle emitted in a single spherically symmetric s-wave nuclear decay produces a manifestly nonspherically symmetric single track in a cloud chamber? I attempt here to generalize earlier work that formulated such a mechanism. The key ingredient there was identification of sites at which the cross section for ionization by a passing charged particle is near singular at ionization threshold. This near singularity arose from a Penning-like process involving molecular polarization in subcritical vapor clusters. Here, I argue that the same Mott problem question should be asked about Geiger counters. I then define a simple experiment to determine if ionization physics similar to the cloud chamber case takes place in the mica window of a Geiger counter and explains the collimation of wavefunctions that are spherically symmetric outside the counter into linear ion tracks inside. The experiment measures the count rate from a radioactive point source as a function of source-window separation. I have performed a proof of concept of this experiment; results are reported here and support the near-singular-ionization picture. These results are significant in their own right, and they may shed light on physical mechanisms underlying instances of the full quantum measurement problem. I illustrate this for the Stern–Gerlach experiment and a particular realization of superconducting qubits. I conclude by detailing further work required to flesh out these results more rigorously.https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2023-0125quantum measurementmott problemgeiger counterstern–gerlach experimentqubit
spellingShingle Schonfeld Jonathan F.
Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?
Open Physics
quantum measurement
mott problem
geiger counter
stern–gerlach experiment
qubit
title Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?
title_full Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?
title_fullStr Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?
title_full_unstemmed Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?
title_short Does the Mott problem extend to Geiger counters?
title_sort does the mott problem extend to geiger counters
topic quantum measurement
mott problem
geiger counter
stern–gerlach experiment
qubit
url https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2023-0125
work_keys_str_mv AT schonfeldjonathanf doesthemottproblemextendtogeigercounters