The “No Reflective Loss” Principle: Towards to the “Priority Rule”
This essay discusses how the “no reflective loss” principle has developed and its current problem. “No reflective loss” principle, introduced in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No.2), developed in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co, is gradually becoming unreasonable, since the applic...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2024-01-01
|
Series: | SHS Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2024/03/shsconf_icpahd2024_02001.pdf |
_version_ | 1797268852279607296 |
---|---|
author | Zhao Jiyang |
author_facet | Zhao Jiyang |
author_sort | Zhao Jiyang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This essay discusses how the “no reflective loss” principle has developed and its current problem. “No reflective loss” principle, introduced in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No.2), developed in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co, is gradually becoming unreasonable, since the application of it has expanded to an exaggerated extent. In the case Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, “no reflective loss” principle was been narrowed, but its fundamentalism brought other issues. Because of the poor policy considerations of “no reflective loss” principle, cases concerning reflective loss are more suitable to be resolved using the “priority rule”. The "Priority rule" not only protects the autonomy of corporate governance, but also protects the interests of shareholders who are overlooked in "no reflective loss" principle and also prevents the problem of double recovery, so the future of this principle is brighter than that of “no reflective loss.” Although this essay has discussed the "priority rule" mainly in two scenarios, there are certainly some refinements to applying it in practice. Further studies should be carried out on a practical level, relating to specific cases, by implementing this principle in existing cases. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-25T01:39:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-85f23aa83cfa4e8ebdcbb0b85a46c712 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2261-2424 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-25T01:39:04Z |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | SHS Web of Conferences |
spelling | doaj.art-85f23aa83cfa4e8ebdcbb0b85a46c7122024-03-08T07:52:08ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242024-01-011830200110.1051/shsconf/202418302001shsconf_icpahd2024_02001The “No Reflective Loss” Principle: Towards to the “Priority Rule”Zhao JiyangThis essay discusses how the “no reflective loss” principle has developed and its current problem. “No reflective loss” principle, introduced in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No.2), developed in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co, is gradually becoming unreasonable, since the application of it has expanded to an exaggerated extent. In the case Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, “no reflective loss” principle was been narrowed, but its fundamentalism brought other issues. Because of the poor policy considerations of “no reflective loss” principle, cases concerning reflective loss are more suitable to be resolved using the “priority rule”. The "Priority rule" not only protects the autonomy of corporate governance, but also protects the interests of shareholders who are overlooked in "no reflective loss" principle and also prevents the problem of double recovery, so the future of this principle is brighter than that of “no reflective loss.” Although this essay has discussed the "priority rule" mainly in two scenarios, there are certainly some refinements to applying it in practice. Further studies should be carried out on a practical level, relating to specific cases, by implementing this principle in existing cases.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2024/03/shsconf_icpahd2024_02001.pdf |
spellingShingle | Zhao Jiyang The “No Reflective Loss” Principle: Towards to the “Priority Rule” SHS Web of Conferences |
title | The “No Reflective Loss” Principle: Towards to the “Priority Rule” |
title_full | The “No Reflective Loss” Principle: Towards to the “Priority Rule” |
title_fullStr | The “No Reflective Loss” Principle: Towards to the “Priority Rule” |
title_full_unstemmed | The “No Reflective Loss” Principle: Towards to the “Priority Rule” |
title_short | The “No Reflective Loss” Principle: Towards to the “Priority Rule” |
title_sort | no reflective loss principle towards to the priority rule |
url | https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2024/03/shsconf_icpahd2024_02001.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaojiyang thenoreflectivelossprincipletowardstothepriorityrule AT zhaojiyang noreflectivelossprincipletowardstothepriorityrule |