Seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattle
Aim: The present study aimed to investigate the seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) infection in the non-vaccinated cattle population in northern part of Tamil Nadu, India. Materials and Methods: A total of 255 sera samples were collected from cattle having the history of re...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Veterinary World
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Veterinary World |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.8/December-2015/9.pdf |
_version_ | 1818876313186861056 |
---|---|
author | M. Saravanajayam K. Kumanan A. Balasubramaniam |
author_facet | M. Saravanajayam K. Kumanan A. Balasubramaniam |
author_sort | M. Saravanajayam |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim: The present study aimed to investigate the seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) infection in the non-vaccinated cattle population in northern part of Tamil Nadu, India.
Materials and Methods: A total of 255 sera samples were collected from cattle having the history of respiratory and reproductive disorder from cattle of different age, breeds, and sex. All the sera samples were subjected to indirect ELISA for the diagnosis of IBR antibodies.
Results: Results revealed that the seroprevalence of IBR infection among non-vaccinated cattle population was of 65.88%. No significant difference was noticed in the prevalence of IBR infection between cattle showing respiratory (63.64%) and reproductive form (70.89%) (p≥0.05). A higher prevalence was noticed in animals above 3 years of age (59.60%) and in crossbred animals (71.26%) than young and non-descript animals. This study showed the higher prevalence of IBR infection in female (67.92%) than in male (33.33%).
Conclusion: Cattle population in this part can better be protected with vaccination than leaving them unvaccinated and seromonitoring shall have to be stressed with regular attempts to isolate and characterize the causative agent for IBR. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:40:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-85fc7d49816344499f70797e05721903 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0972-8988 2231-0916 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:40:24Z |
publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
publisher | Veterinary World |
record_format | Article |
series | Veterinary World |
spelling | doaj.art-85fc7d49816344499f70797e057219032022-12-21T20:19:01ZengVeterinary WorldVeterinary World0972-89882231-09162015-12-018121416141910.14202/vetworld.2015.1416-1419Seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattleM. Saravanajayam 0K. Kumanan 1A. Balasubramaniam2Veterinary University Training and Research Centre, Perambalur - 621 220, Tamil Nadu, India; saravet78@gmail.comTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai - 600 051, Tamil Nadu, India; kumananrani@hotmail.comVeterinary University Training and Research Centre, Perambalur - 621 220, Tamil Nadu, India; balasubramaniam72@gmail.comAim: The present study aimed to investigate the seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) infection in the non-vaccinated cattle population in northern part of Tamil Nadu, India. Materials and Methods: A total of 255 sera samples were collected from cattle having the history of respiratory and reproductive disorder from cattle of different age, breeds, and sex. All the sera samples were subjected to indirect ELISA for the diagnosis of IBR antibodies. Results: Results revealed that the seroprevalence of IBR infection among non-vaccinated cattle population was of 65.88%. No significant difference was noticed in the prevalence of IBR infection between cattle showing respiratory (63.64%) and reproductive form (70.89%) (p≥0.05). A higher prevalence was noticed in animals above 3 years of age (59.60%) and in crossbred animals (71.26%) than young and non-descript animals. This study showed the higher prevalence of IBR infection in female (67.92%) than in male (33.33%). Conclusion: Cattle population in this part can better be protected with vaccination than leaving them unvaccinated and seromonitoring shall have to be stressed with regular attempts to isolate and characterize the causative agent for IBR.http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.8/December-2015/9.pdfcattleenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayinfectious bovine rhinotracheitisprevalence |
spellingShingle | M. Saravanajayam K. Kumanan A. Balasubramaniam Seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattle Veterinary World cattle enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay infectious bovine rhinotracheitis prevalence |
title | Seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattle |
title_full | Seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattle |
title_fullStr | Seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattle |
title_short | Seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattle |
title_sort | seroepidemiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection in unvaccinated cattle |
topic | cattle enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay infectious bovine rhinotracheitis prevalence |
url | http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.8/December-2015/9.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT msaravanajayam seroepidemiologyofinfectiousbovinerhinotracheitisinfectioninunvaccinatedcattle AT kkumanan seroepidemiologyofinfectiousbovinerhinotracheitisinfectioninunvaccinatedcattle AT abalasubramaniam seroepidemiologyofinfectiousbovinerhinotracheitisinfectioninunvaccinatedcattle |