<i>Candida</i> spp. DNA Extraction in the Age of Molecular Diagnosis

The standard procedure for the detection of candidemia is blood culture, a method that might require 3–5 days for a positive result. Compared with culturing, molecular diagnosis techniques can provide faster diagnosis. The current paper aimed to present the main strengths and constraints of current...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smaranda Ioana Codreanu, Cristina Nicoleta Ciurea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/11/4/818
_version_ 1797604249911164928
author Smaranda Ioana Codreanu
Cristina Nicoleta Ciurea
author_facet Smaranda Ioana Codreanu
Cristina Nicoleta Ciurea
author_sort Smaranda Ioana Codreanu
collection DOAJ
description The standard procedure for the detection of candidemia is blood culture, a method that might require 3–5 days for a positive result. Compared with culturing, molecular diagnosis techniques can provide faster diagnosis. The current paper aimed to present the main strengths and constraints of current molecular techniques for <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA extraction, analyzing their efficiency from a time, price, and ease of usage point of view. A comprehensive search was conducted using the PubMed NIH database for peer-reviewed full-text articles published before October 2022. The studies provided adequate data on the diagnosis of the infection with the <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA extraction is a relevant step in yielding pure qualitative DNA to be amplified in molecular diagnostic techniques. The most used fungal DNA extraction strategies are: mechanical (bead beating, ultrasonication, steel-bullet beating), enzymatic (proteinase K, lysozyme, lyticase), and chemical extraction (formic acid, liquid nitrogen, ammonium chloride). More clinical studies are needed to formulate adequate guidelines for fungal DNA extraction as the current paper highlighted discrepancies in the reported outcome.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:43:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-85ff1946fcb548a1980948600c438cdd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2607
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:43:39Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj.art-85ff1946fcb548a1980948600c438cdd2023-11-17T20:30:59ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072023-03-0111481810.3390/microorganisms11040818<i>Candida</i> spp. DNA Extraction in the Age of Molecular DiagnosisSmaranda Ioana Codreanu0Cristina Nicoleta Ciurea1Faculty of Medicine, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Târgu Mures, RomaniaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Târgu Mures, RomaniaThe standard procedure for the detection of candidemia is blood culture, a method that might require 3–5 days for a positive result. Compared with culturing, molecular diagnosis techniques can provide faster diagnosis. The current paper aimed to present the main strengths and constraints of current molecular techniques for <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA extraction, analyzing their efficiency from a time, price, and ease of usage point of view. A comprehensive search was conducted using the PubMed NIH database for peer-reviewed full-text articles published before October 2022. The studies provided adequate data on the diagnosis of the infection with the <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA extraction is a relevant step in yielding pure qualitative DNA to be amplified in molecular diagnostic techniques. The most used fungal DNA extraction strategies are: mechanical (bead beating, ultrasonication, steel-bullet beating), enzymatic (proteinase K, lysozyme, lyticase), and chemical extraction (formic acid, liquid nitrogen, ammonium chloride). More clinical studies are needed to formulate adequate guidelines for fungal DNA extraction as the current paper highlighted discrepancies in the reported outcome.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/11/4/818DNA extractioncandidemiamolecular diagnosticsPCRCandida
spellingShingle Smaranda Ioana Codreanu
Cristina Nicoleta Ciurea
<i>Candida</i> spp. DNA Extraction in the Age of Molecular Diagnosis
Microorganisms
DNA extraction
candidemia
molecular diagnostics
PCR
Candida
title <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA Extraction in the Age of Molecular Diagnosis
title_full <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA Extraction in the Age of Molecular Diagnosis
title_fullStr <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA Extraction in the Age of Molecular Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA Extraction in the Age of Molecular Diagnosis
title_short <i>Candida</i> spp. DNA Extraction in the Age of Molecular Diagnosis
title_sort i candida i spp dna extraction in the age of molecular diagnosis
topic DNA extraction
candidemia
molecular diagnostics
PCR
Candida
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/11/4/818
work_keys_str_mv AT smarandaioanacodreanu icandidaisppdnaextractionintheageofmoleculardiagnosis
AT cristinanicoletaciurea icandidaisppdnaextractionintheageofmoleculardiagnosis