Çürüksüz Servikal Bölge Diş Sert Doku Kayıplarında Universal Adeziv Kullanılarak Yapılan Restorasyonların FDI Kriterlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi
Aim: This study aimed to compare the different application modes of universal bonding agents on non-carious cervical lesions. Material and method: Twenty-five patients without any systemic disease and with good oral hygiene, having at least 20 teeth and 6 non-carious cervical lesions treated us...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cumhuriyet University
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Cumhuriyet Dental Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/617880 |
Summary: | Aim: This study aimed to compare the different
application modes of universal bonding agents on non-carious cervical
lesions.
Material and method: Twenty-five patients without any systemic
disease and with good oral hygiene, having at least 20 teeth and 6 non-carious
cervical lesions treated using a universal adhesive and nano hybrid composite
material were selected among the patients who were treated at Department of
Restorative Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi University between January
2015-March 2015. The 246 restorations included in the study were evaluated
according to FDI criteria at 18-month follow-up. Each bonding mode was analyzed
by Friedman analysis and Dunn’s binary comparison test. Relation between the
categorical mode variate and the scores were analyzed by Pearson Chi-square
analysis (p=0.05).
Results: There was no
significant difference between the application modes at 18-month period
regarding surface luster, surface staining, color match and translucency,
esthetic anatomical form, marginal adaptation, post operative sensitivity,
caries recurrence, erosion, abfraction, tooth integrity and periodontal
response. Marginal discoloration, fracture and retention, and the patient's
view criterias showed a significant difference in terms of the application
modes at 18-month follow-up. Esthetic anatomic form, patient's view, and tooth
integrity were not significantly different between evaluation periods
(p>0.05).
Conclusion: SE mode showed
significantly worse scores than that of TE and SLE modes. Further studies are
needed to evaluate the clinical performance of universal adhesives. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1302-5805 2146-2852 |