Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults

BackgroundCompared with heterosexuals, sexual minorities in the United States experience a higher incidence of negative physical and mental health outcomes. However, a variety of measurement challenges limit researchers’ ability to conduct meaningful survey research to unders...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William J Young, Michelle T Bover Manderski, Ollie Ganz, Cristine D Delnevo, Mary Hrywna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-12-01
Series:JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Online Access:https://publichealth.jmir.org/2021/12/e32294
_version_ 1797735478128017408
author William J Young
Michelle T Bover Manderski
Ollie Ganz
Cristine D Delnevo
Mary Hrywna
author_facet William J Young
Michelle T Bover Manderski
Ollie Ganz
Cristine D Delnevo
Mary Hrywna
author_sort William J Young
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundCompared with heterosexuals, sexual minorities in the United States experience a higher incidence of negative physical and mental health outcomes. However, a variety of measurement challenges limit researchers’ ability to conduct meaningful survey research to understand these disparities. Despite the prevalence of additional identities, many national health surveys only offer respondents 3 substantive options for reporting their sexual identities (straight/heterosexual, gay or lesbian, and bisexual), which could lead to measurement error via misreporting and item nonresponse. ObjectiveThis study compared the traditional 3-option approach to measuring sexual identity with an expanded approach that offered respondents 5 additional options. MethodsAn online survey experiment conducted among New Jersey residents between March and June 2021 randomly assigned 1254 young adults (ages 18-21) to answer either the 3-response measure of sexual identity or the expanded item. Response distributions for each measure were compared as were the odds of item nonresponse. ResultsThe expanded version of the question appeared to result in more accurate reporting among some subgroups and induced less item nonresponse; 12% (77/642) of respondents in the expanded version selected a response that was not available in the shorter version. Females answering the expanded item were less likely to identify as gay or lesbian (2.1% [10/467] vs. 6.6% [30/457]). Females and Non-Hispanic Whites were slightly more likely to skip the shorter version than the longer version (1.1% [5/457 for females and 3/264 for Non-Hispanic Whites] vs. 0% [0/467 for females and 0/277 for Non-Hispanic Whites]). About 5% (32/642) of respondents answering the longer item were unsure of their sexual identity (a similar option was not available in the shorter version). Compared with respondents answering the longer version of the question, those answering the shorter version had substantially greater odds of skipping the question altogether (odds ratio 9.57, 95% CI 1.21-75.74; P=.03). ConclusionsResults favor the use of a longer, more detailed approach to measuring sexual identity in epidemiological research. Such a measure will likely allow researchers to produce more accurate estimates of health behaviors and outcomes among sexual minorities.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:59:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86074987a01042b5ba257e46c37e8f0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2369-2960
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:59:37Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
spelling doaj.art-86074987a01042b5ba257e46c37e8f0f2023-08-28T20:00:16ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Public Health and Surveillance2369-29602021-12-01712e3229410.2196/32294Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young AdultsWilliam J Younghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8051-6327Michelle T Bover Manderskihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0000-221XOllie Ganzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7933-8463Cristine D Delnevohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-4307Mary Hrywnahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-9598 BackgroundCompared with heterosexuals, sexual minorities in the United States experience a higher incidence of negative physical and mental health outcomes. However, a variety of measurement challenges limit researchers’ ability to conduct meaningful survey research to understand these disparities. Despite the prevalence of additional identities, many national health surveys only offer respondents 3 substantive options for reporting their sexual identities (straight/heterosexual, gay or lesbian, and bisexual), which could lead to measurement error via misreporting and item nonresponse. ObjectiveThis study compared the traditional 3-option approach to measuring sexual identity with an expanded approach that offered respondents 5 additional options. MethodsAn online survey experiment conducted among New Jersey residents between March and June 2021 randomly assigned 1254 young adults (ages 18-21) to answer either the 3-response measure of sexual identity or the expanded item. Response distributions for each measure were compared as were the odds of item nonresponse. ResultsThe expanded version of the question appeared to result in more accurate reporting among some subgroups and induced less item nonresponse; 12% (77/642) of respondents in the expanded version selected a response that was not available in the shorter version. Females answering the expanded item were less likely to identify as gay or lesbian (2.1% [10/467] vs. 6.6% [30/457]). Females and Non-Hispanic Whites were slightly more likely to skip the shorter version than the longer version (1.1% [5/457 for females and 3/264 for Non-Hispanic Whites] vs. 0% [0/467 for females and 0/277 for Non-Hispanic Whites]). About 5% (32/642) of respondents answering the longer item were unsure of their sexual identity (a similar option was not available in the shorter version). Compared with respondents answering the longer version of the question, those answering the shorter version had substantially greater odds of skipping the question altogether (odds ratio 9.57, 95% CI 1.21-75.74; P=.03). ConclusionsResults favor the use of a longer, more detailed approach to measuring sexual identity in epidemiological research. Such a measure will likely allow researchers to produce more accurate estimates of health behaviors and outcomes among sexual minorities.https://publichealth.jmir.org/2021/12/e32294
spellingShingle William J Young
Michelle T Bover Manderski
Ollie Ganz
Cristine D Delnevo
Mary Hrywna
Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
title Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults
title_full Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults
title_fullStr Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults
title_short Examining the Impact of Question Construction on Reporting of Sexual Identity: Survey Experiment Among Young Adults
title_sort examining the impact of question construction on reporting of sexual identity survey experiment among young adults
url https://publichealth.jmir.org/2021/12/e32294
work_keys_str_mv AT williamjyoung examiningtheimpactofquestionconstructiononreportingofsexualidentitysurveyexperimentamongyoungadults
AT michelletbovermanderski examiningtheimpactofquestionconstructiononreportingofsexualidentitysurveyexperimentamongyoungadults
AT ollieganz examiningtheimpactofquestionconstructiononreportingofsexualidentitysurveyexperimentamongyoungadults
AT cristineddelnevo examiningtheimpactofquestionconstructiononreportingofsexualidentitysurveyexperimentamongyoungadults
AT maryhrywna examiningtheimpactofquestionconstructiononreportingofsexualidentitysurveyexperimentamongyoungadults