Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations

This work presents experimental research using draped prestressed steel strands to improve the load-carrying capacity of prestressed concrete non-prismatic beams with multiple openings of various designs. The short-term deflection of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams (NPCBs) flexural members...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-Hilali Amjad Majeed, Izzet Amer Farouk, Oukaili Nazar K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0013
_version_ 1797998376998928384
author Al-Hilali Amjad Majeed
Izzet Amer Farouk
Oukaili Nazar K.
author_facet Al-Hilali Amjad Majeed
Izzet Amer Farouk
Oukaili Nazar K.
author_sort Al-Hilali Amjad Majeed
collection DOAJ
description This work presents experimental research using draped prestressed steel strands to improve the load-carrying capacity of prestressed concrete non-prismatic beams with multiple openings of various designs. The short-term deflection of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams (NPCBs) flexural members under static loading were used to evaluate this improvement. Six simply supported (NPCBs) beams, five beams with openings, and one solid specimen used as a reference beam were all tested as part of the experiment. All of the beams were subjected to a monotonic midpoint load test. The configuration of the opening (quadrilateral or circular), as well as the depth of the chords, were the variables studied in this study. In comparison to a solid beam, experimental results show that beams with openings have a lower load-carrying capacity not exceeding (2.3–10.6%) and higher mid-span deflection through all loading stages of elastic, service, and ultimate loads (14–73%), (19–44%), and (31–55%), respectively. Furthermore, specimens with circular openings had stiffer behaviour under load than those with quadrilateral openings. Beams with quadrilateral openings and inclined posts, on the other hand, were stiffer than beams with quadrilateral openings and vertical posts.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:47:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-861c6c1f90c649f487b6dbceed3bc85a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0334-8938
2191-0243
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:47:45Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials
spelling doaj.art-861c6c1f90c649f487b6dbceed3bc85a2022-12-22T04:29:00ZengDe GruyterJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials0334-89382191-02432022-04-0131111812610.1515/jmbm-2022-0013Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurationsAl-Hilali Amjad Majeed0Izzet Amer Farouk1Oukaili Nazar K.2Department of Civil Engineering, University of Baghdad, IraqDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Baghdad, IraqDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Baghdad, IraqThis work presents experimental research using draped prestressed steel strands to improve the load-carrying capacity of prestressed concrete non-prismatic beams with multiple openings of various designs. The short-term deflection of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams (NPCBs) flexural members under static loading were used to evaluate this improvement. Six simply supported (NPCBs) beams, five beams with openings, and one solid specimen used as a reference beam were all tested as part of the experiment. All of the beams were subjected to a monotonic midpoint load test. The configuration of the opening (quadrilateral or circular), as well as the depth of the chords, were the variables studied in this study. In comparison to a solid beam, experimental results show that beams with openings have a lower load-carrying capacity not exceeding (2.3–10.6%) and higher mid-span deflection through all loading stages of elastic, service, and ultimate loads (14–73%), (19–44%), and (31–55%), respectively. Furthermore, specimens with circular openings had stiffer behaviour under load than those with quadrilateral openings. Beams with quadrilateral openings and inclined posts, on the other hand, were stiffer than beams with quadrilateral openings and vertical posts.https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0013prestressednon-prismaticmultiple openingsdiagonal reinforcement
spellingShingle Al-Hilali Amjad Majeed
Izzet Amer Farouk
Oukaili Nazar K.
Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials
prestressed
non-prismatic
multiple openings
diagonal reinforcement
title Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
title_full Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
title_fullStr Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
title_full_unstemmed Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
title_short Deformability of non-prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
title_sort deformability of non prismatic prestressed concrete beams with multiple openings of different configurations
topic prestressed
non-prismatic
multiple openings
diagonal reinforcement
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0013
work_keys_str_mv AT alhilaliamjadmajeed deformabilityofnonprismaticprestressedconcretebeamswithmultipleopeningsofdifferentconfigurations
AT izzetamerfarouk deformabilityofnonprismaticprestressedconcretebeamswithmultipleopeningsofdifferentconfigurations
AT oukailinazark deformabilityofnonprismaticprestressedconcretebeamswithmultipleopeningsofdifferentconfigurations