Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland

QUESTION UNDER STUDY: Anticoagulation therapy is routinely used in cases of non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). The most commonly used drug in such events is enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, is as effective as enox...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michel Pierre Kossovsky, Pierre- Fréderic Keller, François Mach, Jean-Michel Gaspoz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2012-03-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1449
_version_ 1798003503979823104
author Michel Pierre Kossovsky
Pierre- Fréderic Keller
François Mach
Jean-Michel Gaspoz
author_facet Michel Pierre Kossovsky
Pierre- Fréderic Keller
François Mach
Jean-Michel Gaspoz
author_sort Michel Pierre Kossovsky
collection DOAJ
description QUESTION UNDER STUDY: Anticoagulation therapy is routinely used in cases of non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). The most commonly used drug in such events is enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, is as effective as enoxaparin in terms of survival or residual angina pectoris and significantly reduces bleeding complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the magnitude of cost reductions if enoxaparin were replaced by fondaparinux in Switzerland. METHODS: Costs of hospital stay for NSTE-ACS with or without bleeding complications at the Geneva University Hospitals were determined for patients admitted between July 1st, 2007 and June 30th, 2008. These costs were applied to subjects recruited in the AMIS Plus registry, which gathers information on ACS in Swiss hospitals, using three scenarios. Firstly, using the baseline incidence of bleeding episodes observed in the AMIS plus registry. Secondly, using the baseline incidence of haemorrhagic episodes observed in the Geneva University Hospitals sample and thirdly, using the incidence of haemorrhagic episodes observed in the OASIS-5 study. These results and costs were then extrapolated to the national level. RESULTS: At the Swiss national level, replacement of enoxaparin by fondaparinux would generate annual savings ranging from 854,000 Swiss Francs (scenario 1) to 3,400,000 Swiss Francs (scenario 2) and 2,845,000 Swiss Francs (scenario 3). Estimated savings accounted for 55 to 63% of total hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: Use of fondaparinux instead of enoxaparin in patients with NSTE-ACS could yield substantial savings at the local as well as the national level in Switzerland.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:08:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86243d96e392496eb6be60d05372da0e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:08:34Z
publishDate 2012-03-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-86243d96e392496eb6be60d05372da0e2022-12-22T04:24:40ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972012-03-01142111210.4414/smw.2012.13536Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in SwitzerlandMichel Pierre KossovskyPierre- Fréderic KellerFrançois MachJean-Michel Gaspoz QUESTION UNDER STUDY: Anticoagulation therapy is routinely used in cases of non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). The most commonly used drug in such events is enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, is as effective as enoxaparin in terms of survival or residual angina pectoris and significantly reduces bleeding complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the magnitude of cost reductions if enoxaparin were replaced by fondaparinux in Switzerland. METHODS: Costs of hospital stay for NSTE-ACS with or without bleeding complications at the Geneva University Hospitals were determined for patients admitted between July 1st, 2007 and June 30th, 2008. These costs were applied to subjects recruited in the AMIS Plus registry, which gathers information on ACS in Swiss hospitals, using three scenarios. Firstly, using the baseline incidence of bleeding episodes observed in the AMIS plus registry. Secondly, using the baseline incidence of haemorrhagic episodes observed in the Geneva University Hospitals sample and thirdly, using the incidence of haemorrhagic episodes observed in the OASIS-5 study. These results and costs were then extrapolated to the national level. RESULTS: At the Swiss national level, replacement of enoxaparin by fondaparinux would generate annual savings ranging from 854,000 Swiss Francs (scenario 1) to 3,400,000 Swiss Francs (scenario 2) and 2,845,000 Swiss Francs (scenario 3). Estimated savings accounted for 55 to 63% of total hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: Use of fondaparinux instead of enoxaparin in patients with NSTE-ACS could yield substantial savings at the local as well as the national level in Switzerland. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1449anticoagulation therapycost comparisonhospital costsNSTEMI acute coronary events
spellingShingle Michel Pierre Kossovsky
Pierre- Fréderic Keller
François Mach
Jean-Michel Gaspoz
Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland
Swiss Medical Weekly
anticoagulation therapy
cost comparison
hospital costs
NSTEMI acute coronary events
title Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland
title_full Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland
title_fullStr Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland
title_short Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland
title_sort fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes in switzerland
topic anticoagulation therapy
cost comparison
hospital costs
NSTEMI acute coronary events
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1449
work_keys_str_mv AT michelpierrekossovsky fondaparinuxversusenoxaparininthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromesinswitzerland
AT pierrefrederickeller fondaparinuxversusenoxaparininthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromesinswitzerland
AT francoismach fondaparinuxversusenoxaparininthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromesinswitzerland
AT jeanmichelgaspoz fondaparinuxversusenoxaparininthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromesinswitzerland