Tomato bashing

Supreme irony: current research on tomato bashing is still based on a spoof paper written by Georges Perec. His 1974 publication entitled Cantatrix Sopranica L. focuses on the lyrical impact of tomato throwing upon female opera singers. Beyond the game that consists in poetically and ironically cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Contre-culture psychique
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Éditions de l'EHESS 2022-06-01
Series:Transposition
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/transposition/6874
_version_ 1797756852476313600
author Contre-culture psychique
author_facet Contre-culture psychique
author_sort Contre-culture psychique
collection DOAJ
description Supreme irony: current research on tomato bashing is still based on a spoof paper written by Georges Perec. His 1974 publication entitled Cantatrix Sopranica L. focuses on the lyrical impact of tomato throwing upon female opera singers. Beyond the game that consists in poetically and ironically contributing to this editorial field and mimicking the postures of academic speech, there remain epistemological consequences exceeding the references intertwined in the text under study. To further the investigation beyond irony, we must start again from somewhere below it, for irony seems, in and of itself – but can irony, a distancing process per se, be read in itself? – to terminate the investigation. Rather than adding to the parodic commentary of a scientific parody, we shall take this spoof as an opportunity to deal with the counter-psychic coordinates of interlocked failures: the failure of the artist under attack; Perec’s mock failure, which is meant to deride the stylistic wreck of academia; the frosty reception of his paper (so entombed in its Perecquian bibliographical maze that it misses many a blind spot, such as the industrial dimension of the morphologic standardisation of tomatoes, the cultural history of vegetal projectiles, the complex relations between science and literature, etc.) and, after too many attempts, our own failure in relishing the Perecquian concentrate and rigorously assessing the quality of the throw or/and ductility of the projectile in relation to the antisimplicity of the gestural parameters, the internal and external motives initiating such attacks and how the victim can be stimulated into broadening their range of theatrical pleasures, the reactivity of the spectators that do not have any tomato, of those whose tomatoes remain un-thrown, of those using alternative projectiles or/and opting for alternative targets, and the historical aspects of this practice (from the evolution of aesthetic punishments to the commercial and agricultural genealogy of the tomato, as well as the political and poetical consequences brought about by the successive standardisations that have been operated on various scales).
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:07:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86363350bc5d4ef3ba6d2574a65c1862
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2110-6134
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:07:32Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Éditions de l'EHESS
record_format Article
series Transposition
spelling doaj.art-86363350bc5d4ef3ba6d2574a65c18622023-08-02T09:26:42ZengÉditions de l'EHESSTransposition2110-61342022-06-011010.4000/transposition.6874Tomato bashingContre-culture psychiqueSupreme irony: current research on tomato bashing is still based on a spoof paper written by Georges Perec. His 1974 publication entitled Cantatrix Sopranica L. focuses on the lyrical impact of tomato throwing upon female opera singers. Beyond the game that consists in poetically and ironically contributing to this editorial field and mimicking the postures of academic speech, there remain epistemological consequences exceeding the references intertwined in the text under study. To further the investigation beyond irony, we must start again from somewhere below it, for irony seems, in and of itself – but can irony, a distancing process per se, be read in itself? – to terminate the investigation. Rather than adding to the parodic commentary of a scientific parody, we shall take this spoof as an opportunity to deal with the counter-psychic coordinates of interlocked failures: the failure of the artist under attack; Perec’s mock failure, which is meant to deride the stylistic wreck of academia; the frosty reception of his paper (so entombed in its Perecquian bibliographical maze that it misses many a blind spot, such as the industrial dimension of the morphologic standardisation of tomatoes, the cultural history of vegetal projectiles, the complex relations between science and literature, etc.) and, after too many attempts, our own failure in relishing the Perecquian concentrate and rigorously assessing the quality of the throw or/and ductility of the projectile in relation to the antisimplicity of the gestural parameters, the internal and external motives initiating such attacks and how the victim can be stimulated into broadening their range of theatrical pleasures, the reactivity of the spectators that do not have any tomato, of those whose tomatoes remain un-thrown, of those using alternative projectiles or/and opting for alternative targets, and the historical aspects of this practice (from the evolution of aesthetic punishments to the commercial and agricultural genealogy of the tomato, as well as the political and poetical consequences brought about by the successive standardisations that have been operated on various scales).http://journals.openedition.org/transposition/6874Perectomatooperaflopbashingketchup
spellingShingle Contre-culture psychique
Tomato bashing
Transposition
Perec
tomato
opera
flop
bashing
ketchup
title Tomato bashing
title_full Tomato bashing
title_fullStr Tomato bashing
title_full_unstemmed Tomato bashing
title_short Tomato bashing
title_sort tomato bashing
topic Perec
tomato
opera
flop
bashing
ketchup
url http://journals.openedition.org/transposition/6874
work_keys_str_mv AT contreculturepsychique tomatobashing