Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact
This paper proposes the use of a pseudo-3D ball-lattice artifact to characterize a handheld laser scanner from a metrological standpoint. The artifact allows the computation of local and global errors in measurement by using the reference-frame-independent parameters of size, form, and distance with...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/2137 |
_version_ | 1827697352905850880 |
---|---|
author | Rémi Bonin Farbod Khameneifar J.R.R. Mayer |
author_facet | Rémi Bonin Farbod Khameneifar J.R.R. Mayer |
author_sort | Rémi Bonin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper proposes the use of a pseudo-3D ball-lattice artifact to characterize a handheld laser scanner from a metrological standpoint. The artifact allows the computation of local and global errors in measurement by using the reference-frame-independent parameters of size, form, and distance within the measuring volume of the scanner, and in a single point cloud, without the need for registration. A set of tests was performed using the whole measuring volume, and three acquisition parameters, namely the orientation of the sweeps during the scans, the exposure time, and the distance to the scanner were analyzed for their effects on the accuracy of the scan data. A composite error including the errors in measuring size, form, and distance was used as a single figure of merit to characterize the performance of the scanner in relation to the data-acquisition parameters. The orientation of sweeps did not have a considerable effect on the errors. The accuracy of the scan data was strongly affected by exposure time and its interaction with the distance at which the artifact was scanned. The errors followed a quadratic trend with respect to the distance of the artifact to the scanner. The tested scanner performed best at its manufacturer’s recommended stand-off distance. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T13:06:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-863796cfba044917a8d5f1c01e443708 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1424-8220 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T13:06:54Z |
publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Sensors |
spelling | doaj.art-863796cfba044917a8d5f1c01e4437082023-11-21T11:02:25ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-03-01216213710.3390/s21062137Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice ArtifactRémi Bonin0Farbod Khameneifar1J.R.R. Mayer2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, CanadaThis paper proposes the use of a pseudo-3D ball-lattice artifact to characterize a handheld laser scanner from a metrological standpoint. The artifact allows the computation of local and global errors in measurement by using the reference-frame-independent parameters of size, form, and distance within the measuring volume of the scanner, and in a single point cloud, without the need for registration. A set of tests was performed using the whole measuring volume, and three acquisition parameters, namely the orientation of the sweeps during the scans, the exposure time, and the distance to the scanner were analyzed for their effects on the accuracy of the scan data. A composite error including the errors in measuring size, form, and distance was used as a single figure of merit to characterize the performance of the scanner in relation to the data-acquisition parameters. The orientation of sweeps did not have a considerable effect on the errors. The accuracy of the scan data was strongly affected by exposure time and its interaction with the distance at which the artifact was scanned. The errors followed a quadratic trend with respect to the distance of the artifact to the scanner. The tested scanner performed best at its manufacturer’s recommended stand-off distance.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/21373D scanninghandheld laser scannermetrological performanceacquisition parameterspseudo-3D artifact |
spellingShingle | Rémi Bonin Farbod Khameneifar J.R.R. Mayer Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact Sensors 3D scanning handheld laser scanner metrological performance acquisition parameters pseudo-3D artifact |
title | Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact |
title_full | Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact |
title_short | Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact |
title_sort | evaluation of the metrological performance of a handheld 3d laser scanner using a pseudo 3d ball lattice artifact |
topic | 3D scanning handheld laser scanner metrological performance acquisition parameters pseudo-3D artifact |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/2137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT remibonin evaluationofthemetrologicalperformanceofahandheld3dlaserscannerusingapseudo3dballlatticeartifact AT farbodkhameneifar evaluationofthemetrologicalperformanceofahandheld3dlaserscannerusingapseudo3dballlatticeartifact AT jrrmayer evaluationofthemetrologicalperformanceofahandheld3dlaserscannerusingapseudo3dballlatticeartifact |