Sequence depth, not PCR replication, improves ecological inference from next generation DNA sequencing.

Recent advances in molecular approaches and DNA sequencing have greatly progressed the field of ecology and allowed for the study of complex communities in unprecedented detail. Next generation sequencing (NGS) can reveal powerful insights into the diversity, composition, and dynamics of cryptic org...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dylan P Smith, Kabir G Peay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3938664?pdf=render
_version_ 1811310981389746176
author Dylan P Smith
Kabir G Peay
author_facet Dylan P Smith
Kabir G Peay
author_sort Dylan P Smith
collection DOAJ
description Recent advances in molecular approaches and DNA sequencing have greatly progressed the field of ecology and allowed for the study of complex communities in unprecedented detail. Next generation sequencing (NGS) can reveal powerful insights into the diversity, composition, and dynamics of cryptic organisms, but results may be sensitive to a number of technical factors, including molecular practices used to generate amplicons, sequencing technology, and data processing. Despite the popularity of some techniques over others, explicit tests of the relative benefits they convey in molecular ecology studies remain scarce. Here we tested the effects of PCR replication, sequencing depth, and sequencing platform on ecological inference drawn from environmental samples of soil fungi. We sequenced replicates of three soil samples taken from pine biomes in North America represented by pools of either one, two, four, eight, or sixteen PCR replicates with both 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina MiSeq. Increasing the number of pooled PCR replicates had no detectable effect on measures of α- and β-diversity. Pseudo-β-diversity - which we define as dissimilarity between re-sequenced replicates of the same sample - decreased markedly with increasing sampling depth. The total richness recovered with Illumina was significantly higher than with 454, but measures of α- and β-diversity between a larger set of fungal samples sequenced on both platforms were highly correlated. Our results suggest that molecular ecology studies will benefit more from investing in robust sequencing technologies than from replicating PCRs. This study also demonstrates the potential for continuous integration of older datasets with newer technology.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:08:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8638ad9e87a64b3380c489633b4b37e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:08:38Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-8638ad9e87a64b3380c489633b4b37e12022-12-22T02:50:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e9023410.1371/journal.pone.0090234Sequence depth, not PCR replication, improves ecological inference from next generation DNA sequencing.Dylan P SmithKabir G PeayRecent advances in molecular approaches and DNA sequencing have greatly progressed the field of ecology and allowed for the study of complex communities in unprecedented detail. Next generation sequencing (NGS) can reveal powerful insights into the diversity, composition, and dynamics of cryptic organisms, but results may be sensitive to a number of technical factors, including molecular practices used to generate amplicons, sequencing technology, and data processing. Despite the popularity of some techniques over others, explicit tests of the relative benefits they convey in molecular ecology studies remain scarce. Here we tested the effects of PCR replication, sequencing depth, and sequencing platform on ecological inference drawn from environmental samples of soil fungi. We sequenced replicates of three soil samples taken from pine biomes in North America represented by pools of either one, two, four, eight, or sixteen PCR replicates with both 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina MiSeq. Increasing the number of pooled PCR replicates had no detectable effect on measures of α- and β-diversity. Pseudo-β-diversity - which we define as dissimilarity between re-sequenced replicates of the same sample - decreased markedly with increasing sampling depth. The total richness recovered with Illumina was significantly higher than with 454, but measures of α- and β-diversity between a larger set of fungal samples sequenced on both platforms were highly correlated. Our results suggest that molecular ecology studies will benefit more from investing in robust sequencing technologies than from replicating PCRs. This study also demonstrates the potential for continuous integration of older datasets with newer technology.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3938664?pdf=render
spellingShingle Dylan P Smith
Kabir G Peay
Sequence depth, not PCR replication, improves ecological inference from next generation DNA sequencing.
PLoS ONE
title Sequence depth, not PCR replication, improves ecological inference from next generation DNA sequencing.
title_full Sequence depth, not PCR replication, improves ecological inference from next generation DNA sequencing.
title_fullStr Sequence depth, not PCR replication, improves ecological inference from next generation DNA sequencing.
title_full_unstemmed Sequence depth, not PCR replication, improves ecological inference from next generation DNA sequencing.
title_short Sequence depth, not PCR replication, improves ecological inference from next generation DNA sequencing.
title_sort sequence depth not pcr replication improves ecological inference from next generation dna sequencing
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3938664?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT dylanpsmith sequencedepthnotpcrreplicationimprovesecologicalinferencefromnextgenerationdnasequencing
AT kabirgpeay sequencedepthnotpcrreplicationimprovesecologicalinferencefromnextgenerationdnasequencing