Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used in advanced breast cancer patients. However, there is little known about conversion frequency of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) status for hormone receptor positive-breast cancer patients after NAC and their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Libo Yang, Xiaorong Zhong, Tianjie Pu, Yan Qiu, Feng Ye, Hong Bu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-03-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1332-7
_version_ 1818136993725415424
author Libo Yang
Xiaorong Zhong
Tianjie Pu
Yan Qiu
Feng Ye
Hong Bu
author_facet Libo Yang
Xiaorong Zhong
Tianjie Pu
Yan Qiu
Feng Ye
Hong Bu
author_sort Libo Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used in advanced breast cancer patients. However, there is little known about conversion frequency of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) status for hormone receptor positive-breast cancer patients after NAC and their correlation with prognosis. Methods In this study, 231 breast cancer patients with residual disease after NAC were enrolled and divided into receptor stable group (having no conversion in both ER and PR status pre- and post-NAC) and any receptor conversion group (having any conversion in either ER or PR status). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were used to compare survival differences between the two groups. Results Fifty-five patients (23.8%) had ER and/or PR conversion after NAC. Younger patients (≤ 50 years) were more likely to have receptor conversion (P = 0.014). For 213 patients (92.2%) who received adjuvant endocrinotherapy after surgery, the 5-year disease free survival (DFS) estimates for patients in the any receptor conversion group (55.2%) was worse than patients in the receptor stable group (73.7%, Log-rank test, P = 0.015). While the 5-year overall survival estimates for patients with or without receptor conversion were not statistically different (86.0 vs. 82.4%, Log-rank test, P = 0.587). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses, patients with any receptor conversion had worse DFS (hazard ratio, 1.995; 95% confidence interval, 1.130–3.521, P = 0.031). Conclusions It is necessary to recommend patients to test biomarkers in residual disease and pay more attention to patients who have any receptor conversion. These patients may need more individual therapy after surgery.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T09:49:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-863c911d49204832af419509ca495cca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T09:49:14Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-863c911d49204832af419509ca495cca2022-12-22T01:12:28ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192018-03-011611910.1186/s12957-018-1332-7Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapyLibo Yang0Xiaorong Zhong1Tianjie Pu2Yan Qiu3Feng Ye4Hong Bu5Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartments of Head and Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityLaboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityAbstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used in advanced breast cancer patients. However, there is little known about conversion frequency of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) status for hormone receptor positive-breast cancer patients after NAC and their correlation with prognosis. Methods In this study, 231 breast cancer patients with residual disease after NAC were enrolled and divided into receptor stable group (having no conversion in both ER and PR status pre- and post-NAC) and any receptor conversion group (having any conversion in either ER or PR status). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were used to compare survival differences between the two groups. Results Fifty-five patients (23.8%) had ER and/or PR conversion after NAC. Younger patients (≤ 50 years) were more likely to have receptor conversion (P = 0.014). For 213 patients (92.2%) who received adjuvant endocrinotherapy after surgery, the 5-year disease free survival (DFS) estimates for patients in the any receptor conversion group (55.2%) was worse than patients in the receptor stable group (73.7%, Log-rank test, P = 0.015). While the 5-year overall survival estimates for patients with or without receptor conversion were not statistically different (86.0 vs. 82.4%, Log-rank test, P = 0.587). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses, patients with any receptor conversion had worse DFS (hazard ratio, 1.995; 95% confidence interval, 1.130–3.521, P = 0.031). Conclusions It is necessary to recommend patients to test biomarkers in residual disease and pay more attention to patients who have any receptor conversion. These patients may need more individual therapy after surgery.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1332-7Breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyHormone receptorReceptor conversion
spellingShingle Libo Yang
Xiaorong Zhong
Tianjie Pu
Yan Qiu
Feng Ye
Hong Bu
Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Breast cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Hormone receptor
Receptor conversion
title Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_full Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_fullStr Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_short Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_sort clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
topic Breast cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Hormone receptor
Receptor conversion
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1332-7
work_keys_str_mv AT liboyang clinicalsignificanceandprognosticvalueofreceptorconversioninhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT xiaorongzhong clinicalsignificanceandprognosticvalueofreceptorconversioninhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT tianjiepu clinicalsignificanceandprognosticvalueofreceptorconversioninhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT yanqiu clinicalsignificanceandprognosticvalueofreceptorconversioninhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT fengye clinicalsignificanceandprognosticvalueofreceptorconversioninhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT hongbu clinicalsignificanceandprognosticvalueofreceptorconversioninhormonereceptorpositivebreastcancersafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy