The Argumentative Quality of the Qualitative Research Report
The author argues that, to be convincing, the claims of a qualitative research report must be logically and clearly supported. Eight rules for good argumentative dialogue are presented. The author then presents the process of analogical reasoning to support cross-case generalization.
Main Author: | Adri Smaling |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2002-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100304 |
Similar Items
-
Origin of the scientific arguments underlying qualitative research
by: Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Evaluation of arguments in research reports
by: Annatjie Botes
Published: (2000-10-01) -
Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory
by: Fabio Paglieri
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory
by: Fabio Paglieri
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Intellectual abilities of adolescents and qualitative characteristics of their social argumentation
by: Smirnova O.M., et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)