Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry

Abstract Background Loss to follow-up may bias outcome assessments in medical registries. This cohort study aimed to analyze and compare patients who failed to respond with those that responded to the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). Methods We analyzed a cohort of 474 consecutive pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simran Kaur, Ole Kristian Alhaug, Filip C. Dolatowski, Tore K. Solberg, Greger Lønne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3
_version_ 1797865892057448448
author Simran Kaur
Ole Kristian Alhaug
Filip C. Dolatowski
Tore K. Solberg
Greger Lønne
author_facet Simran Kaur
Ole Kristian Alhaug
Filip C. Dolatowski
Tore K. Solberg
Greger Lønne
author_sort Simran Kaur
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Loss to follow-up may bias outcome assessments in medical registries. This cohort study aimed to analyze and compare patients who failed to respond with those that responded to the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). Methods We analyzed a cohort of 474 consecutive patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis at four public hospitals in Norway during a two-year period. These patients reported sociodemographic data, preoperative symptoms, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numerical rating scales (NRS) for back and leg pain to NORspine at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. We contacted all patients who did not respond to NORspine after 12 months. Those who responded were termed responsive non-respondents and compared to 12 months respondents. Results One hundred forty (30%) did not respond to NORspine 12 months after surgery and 123 were available for additional follow-up. Sixty-four of the 123 non-respondents (52%) responded to a cross-sectional survey done at a median of 50 (36–64) months after surgery. At baseline, non-respondents were younger 63 (SD 11.7) vs. 68 (SD 9.9) years (mean difference (95% CI) 4.7 years (2.6 to 6.7); p =  < 0.001) and more frequently smokers 41 (30%) vs. 70 (21%) RR (95%CI) = 1.40 (1.01 to 1.95); p = 0.044. There were no other relevant differences in other sociodemographic variables or preoperative symptoms. We found no differences in the effect of surgery on non-respondents vs. respondents (ODI (SD) = 28.2 (19.9) vs. 25.2 (18.9), MD (95%CI) = 3.0 ( -2.1 to 8.1); p = 0.250). Conclusion We found that 30% of patients did not respond to NORspine at 12 months after spine surgery. Non-respondents were somewhat younger and smoked more frequently than respondents; however, there were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures. Our findings suggest that attrition bias in NORspine was random and due to non-modifiable factors.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:15:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8668a6a6798a4f88b3cb68f09b6ea49f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:15:28Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-8668a6a6798a4f88b3cb68f09b6ea49f2023-03-22T10:02:27ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742023-03-012411710.1186/s12891-023-06267-3Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registrySimran Kaur0Ole Kristian Alhaug1Filip C. Dolatowski2Tore K. Solberg3Greger Lønne4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martina Hansens HospitalInnlandet Hospital TrustDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Neurosurgery & Norwegian Registry for Spine surgery, University Hospital of North NorwayInnlandet Hospital TrustAbstract Background Loss to follow-up may bias outcome assessments in medical registries. This cohort study aimed to analyze and compare patients who failed to respond with those that responded to the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). Methods We analyzed a cohort of 474 consecutive patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis at four public hospitals in Norway during a two-year period. These patients reported sociodemographic data, preoperative symptoms, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numerical rating scales (NRS) for back and leg pain to NORspine at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. We contacted all patients who did not respond to NORspine after 12 months. Those who responded were termed responsive non-respondents and compared to 12 months respondents. Results One hundred forty (30%) did not respond to NORspine 12 months after surgery and 123 were available for additional follow-up. Sixty-four of the 123 non-respondents (52%) responded to a cross-sectional survey done at a median of 50 (36–64) months after surgery. At baseline, non-respondents were younger 63 (SD 11.7) vs. 68 (SD 9.9) years (mean difference (95% CI) 4.7 years (2.6 to 6.7); p =  < 0.001) and more frequently smokers 41 (30%) vs. 70 (21%) RR (95%CI) = 1.40 (1.01 to 1.95); p = 0.044. There were no other relevant differences in other sociodemographic variables or preoperative symptoms. We found no differences in the effect of surgery on non-respondents vs. respondents (ODI (SD) = 28.2 (19.9) vs. 25.2 (18.9), MD (95%CI) = 3.0 ( -2.1 to 8.1); p = 0.250). Conclusion We found that 30% of patients did not respond to NORspine at 12 months after spine surgery. Non-respondents were somewhat younger and smoked more frequently than respondents; however, there were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures. Our findings suggest that attrition bias in NORspine was random and due to non-modifiable factors.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3Loss to follow-upSpine surgeryAttrition biasRegistryNon-responseLumbar spinal stenosis
spellingShingle Simran Kaur
Ole Kristian Alhaug
Filip C. Dolatowski
Tore K. Solberg
Greger Lønne
Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Loss to follow-up
Spine surgery
Attrition bias
Registry
Non-response
Lumbar spinal stenosis
title Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_full Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_fullStr Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_short Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_sort characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
topic Loss to follow-up
Spine surgery
Attrition bias
Registry
Non-response
Lumbar spinal stenosis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3
work_keys_str_mv AT simrankaur characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry
AT olekristianalhaug characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry
AT filipcdolatowski characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry
AT toreksolberg characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry
AT gregerlønne characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry