Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory
Schmidt et al.’s (2020) PEP model accurately reflects the complexity of task switching based on bottom-up assumptions and episodic memory, re-evaluating the contribution of commonly presumed top-down processes. Extending it to long-term bindings and their item-specific effects could eludicate puzzli...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Cognition |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/110 |
| _version_ | 1818199078165544960 |
|---|---|
| author | Christina Pfeuffer |
| author_facet | Christina Pfeuffer |
| author_sort | Christina Pfeuffer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Schmidt et al.’s (2020) PEP model accurately reflects the complexity of task switching based on bottom-up assumptions and episodic memory, re-evaluating the contribution of commonly presumed top-down processes. Extending it to long-term bindings and their item-specific effects could eludicate puzzling findings regarding the independence of long-term bindings between stimuli, responses, and task-specific categorizations as well as the relation between short-term and long-term bindings. Moreover, ideomotor theories of action control provide a bottom-up basis of incorporating volition and intentional action into the PEP model which is currently restricted to stimulus-based action. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T02:16:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-868f70760eea480aaef4b42e0e6f5f8b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2514-4820 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T02:16:02Z |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | Ubiquity Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Cognition |
| spelling | doaj.art-868f70760eea480aaef4b42e0e6f5f8b2022-12-22T00:41:48ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202020-09-013110.5334/joc.110129Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic MemoryChristina Pfeuffer0University of Freiburg, Department of Psychology, FreiburgSchmidt et al.’s (2020) PEP model accurately reflects the complexity of task switching based on bottom-up assumptions and episodic memory, re-evaluating the contribution of commonly presumed top-down processes. Extending it to long-term bindings and their item-specific effects could eludicate puzzling findings regarding the independence of long-term bindings between stimuli, responses, and task-specific categorizations as well as the relation between short-term and long-term bindings. Moreover, ideomotor theories of action control provide a bottom-up basis of incorporating volition and intentional action into the PEP model which is currently restricted to stimulus-based action.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/110episodic memorybindingcognitive controlitem-specificityintentional action |
| spellingShingle | Christina Pfeuffer Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory Journal of Cognition episodic memory binding cognitive control item-specificity intentional action |
| title | Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory |
| title_full | Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory |
| title_fullStr | Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory |
| title_full_unstemmed | Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory |
| title_short | Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory |
| title_sort | item specificity and intention in episodic memory |
| topic | episodic memory binding cognitive control item-specificity intentional action |
| url | https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/110 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christinapfeuffer itemspecificityandintentioninepisodicmemory |