Studies of indigenous lithic procurement in Uruguay and their implications for Southern Cone archaeology
Being a territory with several minerals and rocks suitable for knapping and grinding, Uruguay offered a lithic-rich environment for past indigenous cultures in the Southern Cone of South America. In this paper, a history of lithic procurement studies in Uruguay is presented. Three main periods are d...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Edinburgh
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Lithic Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.ed.ac.uk/lithicstudies/article/view/1522 |
| _version_ | 1797736012032507904 |
|---|---|
| author | Arlys Nicolás Batalla |
| author_facet | Arlys Nicolás Batalla |
| author_sort | Arlys Nicolás Batalla |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Being a territory with several minerals and rocks suitable for knapping and grinding, Uruguay offered a lithic-rich environment for past indigenous cultures in the Southern Cone of South America. In this paper, a history of lithic procurement studies in Uruguay is presented. Three main periods are discriminated, paying attention to authors’ theoretical and methodological contributions to the field. Firstly, a period with general mention to raw materials utilised by indigenous groups, including those historically known, is recognised at least since the last decades of the nineteenth century. Secondly, a period involving description of lithic resources available at a national scale as well as the first detailed observations of lithic sources and possible means of procurement can be distinguished between the 1950s and the mid-1980s. Lastly, beginning with salvage archaeology in the eastern region, the current period of research (i.e. the last thirty years) is characterised by contextualising lithic procurement within issues of lithic technological organisation and settlement patterns of indigenous groups. The current period of studies has involved two different approaches: 1) technological analysis of lithic artefacts and comparison of raw material with previously-published geological data; 2) utilisation of field survey data that locate and map lithic resources, and characterisation of visual (macroscopic, microscopic, or both macroscopic and microscopic) and geochemical components of these resources. Within the latter, studies can be further arranged according to the main temporal framework used to contextualise research problems. On the one hand, questions involving lithic procurement of early hunter-gatherers (who arrived ca. 12,000 BP) since the end of the 1990s have included surveys of potential and utilised sources, the first thin-section-based petrographic studies and the distinction of different local, regional and long-distance procurement strategies. On the other hand, cultural changes since the Middle Holocene have framed lithic source survey studies to answer questions of resource accessibility for coastal groups during sea level changes, as well as for other now-diverse groups such as the lowland moundbuilders. Finally, considerations for future research are made by reconsidering recent developments alongside the history of lithic procurement studies in Uruguay. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:07:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-869e53494a1c4c0aaaddd112d7f2f631 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2055-0472 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:07:25Z |
| publishDate | 2016-09-01 |
| publisher | University of Edinburgh |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Lithic Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-869e53494a1c4c0aaaddd112d7f2f6312023-08-28T14:24:02ZengUniversity of EdinburghJournal of Lithic Studies2055-04722016-09-013126529210.2218/jls.v3i1.15221522Studies of indigenous lithic procurement in Uruguay and their implications for Southern Cone archaeologyArlys Nicolás Batalla0Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, São Paulo UniversityBeing a territory with several minerals and rocks suitable for knapping and grinding, Uruguay offered a lithic-rich environment for past indigenous cultures in the Southern Cone of South America. In this paper, a history of lithic procurement studies in Uruguay is presented. Three main periods are discriminated, paying attention to authors’ theoretical and methodological contributions to the field. Firstly, a period with general mention to raw materials utilised by indigenous groups, including those historically known, is recognised at least since the last decades of the nineteenth century. Secondly, a period involving description of lithic resources available at a national scale as well as the first detailed observations of lithic sources and possible means of procurement can be distinguished between the 1950s and the mid-1980s. Lastly, beginning with salvage archaeology in the eastern region, the current period of research (i.e. the last thirty years) is characterised by contextualising lithic procurement within issues of lithic technological organisation and settlement patterns of indigenous groups. The current period of studies has involved two different approaches: 1) technological analysis of lithic artefacts and comparison of raw material with previously-published geological data; 2) utilisation of field survey data that locate and map lithic resources, and characterisation of visual (macroscopic, microscopic, or both macroscopic and microscopic) and geochemical components of these resources. Within the latter, studies can be further arranged according to the main temporal framework used to contextualise research problems. On the one hand, questions involving lithic procurement of early hunter-gatherers (who arrived ca. 12,000 BP) since the end of the 1990s have included surveys of potential and utilised sources, the first thin-section-based petrographic studies and the distinction of different local, regional and long-distance procurement strategies. On the other hand, cultural changes since the Middle Holocene have framed lithic source survey studies to answer questions of resource accessibility for coastal groups during sea level changes, as well as for other now-diverse groups such as the lowland moundbuilders. Finally, considerations for future research are made by reconsidering recent developments alongside the history of lithic procurement studies in Uruguay.http://journals.ed.ac.uk/lithicstudies/article/view/1522lithic procurementuruguayresearch frameworkssouthern cone archaeologyindigenous lithic technology |
| spellingShingle | Arlys Nicolás Batalla Studies of indigenous lithic procurement in Uruguay and their implications for Southern Cone archaeology Journal of Lithic Studies lithic procurement uruguay research frameworks southern cone archaeology indigenous lithic technology |
| title | Studies of indigenous lithic procurement in Uruguay and their implications for Southern Cone archaeology |
| title_full | Studies of indigenous lithic procurement in Uruguay and their implications for Southern Cone archaeology |
| title_fullStr | Studies of indigenous lithic procurement in Uruguay and their implications for Southern Cone archaeology |
| title_full_unstemmed | Studies of indigenous lithic procurement in Uruguay and their implications for Southern Cone archaeology |
| title_short | Studies of indigenous lithic procurement in Uruguay and their implications for Southern Cone archaeology |
| title_sort | studies of indigenous lithic procurement in uruguay and their implications for southern cone archaeology |
| topic | lithic procurement uruguay research frameworks southern cone archaeology indigenous lithic technology |
| url | http://journals.ed.ac.uk/lithicstudies/article/view/1522 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arlysnicolasbatalla studiesofindigenouslithicprocurementinuruguayandtheirimplicationsforsouthernconearchaeology |