Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion

BackgroundThe Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System (DOTTS) was developed to improve the quality of acute obstetric care. To achieve optimal effect, the DOTTS should be adopted in the daily care process by triage staff. ObjectiveThe primary aim was to evaluate t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bernice Engeltjes, Ageeth Rosman, Fedde Scheele, Christiaan Vis, Eveline Wouters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2022-06-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2022/6/e33709
_version_ 1797735000414617600
author Bernice Engeltjes
Ageeth Rosman
Fedde Scheele
Christiaan Vis
Eveline Wouters
author_facet Bernice Engeltjes
Ageeth Rosman
Fedde Scheele
Christiaan Vis
Eveline Wouters
author_sort Bernice Engeltjes
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System (DOTTS) was developed to improve the quality of acute obstetric care. To achieve optimal effect, the DOTTS should be adopted in the daily care process by triage staff. ObjectiveThe primary aim was to evaluate the degree of implementation (ie, normalization) of the DOTTS, and the secondary aim was to evaluate which lessons can be learned from its current implementation in Dutch hospitals. MethodsAn evaluation study with a mixed methods design was performed. All triage staff in 9 Dutch hospitals that implemented the DOTTS before September 1, 2019, were invited to complete the Normalization Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire between December 2019 and July 2020. The questionnaire is based on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). This self-reported questionnaire provides insights into the work people do in order to integrate and embed new practice in routine care. The NPT is based on the following 4 constructs: coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. Within the questionnaire, each construct is represented by 4-7 questions. Questions are scored on a 5-point normalization process scale. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of questionnaire scores. Subsequently, the questionnaire findings were discussed during a focus group. Template analysis following the 4 constructs was used for analyzing the results of the focus group. ResultsOverall, 173 of 294 (58.8%) triage staff members completed the NoMAD questionnaire, and 90.2% (156/173) of the participants had used the DOTTS for over 6 months. The digital application was used as much as possible or always by 137 of 173 (79.2%) participants. The overall normalization process score was 3.77 (SD 0.36). The constructs coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring scored 4.01 (SD 0.47), 4.05 (SD 0.45), 3.5 (SD 0.45), and 3.72 (SD 0.47), respectively. Analysis of the focus group discussion showed that the added value of the DOTTS was seen as a quality improvement for the care of pregnant women. Dedication of the complete multidisciplinary implementation team was important for facilitating normalization. Support from the medical staff and proper use by all disciplines involved in the triage were seen as facilitating factors. Participants appreciated training and evaluation, and indicated a need for ongoing training and evaluation in relation to goal achievement. ConclusionsThe DOTTS has been integrated into normal care in daily practice. Evaluation by the NoMAD questionnaire provided a positive overall score. These results are in line with or, in some aspects, better than the results of other evaluation studies. Key factors in the normalization process of the DOTTS in obstetric triage are the shared added value for stakeholders, the dedication of the complete multidisciplinary implementation team, and implementation plans that are tailor made in the practical context of the hospital.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:51:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86a2cd401d5b404ba9191c2364f74683
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-326X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:51:50Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Formative Research
spelling doaj.art-86a2cd401d5b404ba9191c2364f746832023-08-28T22:19:03ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2022-06-0166e3370910.2196/33709Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group DiscussionBernice Engeltjeshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8631-2352Ageeth Rosmanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3751-2950Fedde Scheelehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9593-257XChristiaan Vishttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-8487Eveline Woutershttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8911-9398 BackgroundThe Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System (DOTTS) was developed to improve the quality of acute obstetric care. To achieve optimal effect, the DOTTS should be adopted in the daily care process by triage staff. ObjectiveThe primary aim was to evaluate the degree of implementation (ie, normalization) of the DOTTS, and the secondary aim was to evaluate which lessons can be learned from its current implementation in Dutch hospitals. MethodsAn evaluation study with a mixed methods design was performed. All triage staff in 9 Dutch hospitals that implemented the DOTTS before September 1, 2019, were invited to complete the Normalization Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire between December 2019 and July 2020. The questionnaire is based on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). This self-reported questionnaire provides insights into the work people do in order to integrate and embed new practice in routine care. The NPT is based on the following 4 constructs: coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. Within the questionnaire, each construct is represented by 4-7 questions. Questions are scored on a 5-point normalization process scale. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of questionnaire scores. Subsequently, the questionnaire findings were discussed during a focus group. Template analysis following the 4 constructs was used for analyzing the results of the focus group. ResultsOverall, 173 of 294 (58.8%) triage staff members completed the NoMAD questionnaire, and 90.2% (156/173) of the participants had used the DOTTS for over 6 months. The digital application was used as much as possible or always by 137 of 173 (79.2%) participants. The overall normalization process score was 3.77 (SD 0.36). The constructs coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring scored 4.01 (SD 0.47), 4.05 (SD 0.45), 3.5 (SD 0.45), and 3.72 (SD 0.47), respectively. Analysis of the focus group discussion showed that the added value of the DOTTS was seen as a quality improvement for the care of pregnant women. Dedication of the complete multidisciplinary implementation team was important for facilitating normalization. Support from the medical staff and proper use by all disciplines involved in the triage were seen as facilitating factors. Participants appreciated training and evaluation, and indicated a need for ongoing training and evaluation in relation to goal achievement. ConclusionsThe DOTTS has been integrated into normal care in daily practice. Evaluation by the NoMAD questionnaire provided a positive overall score. These results are in line with or, in some aspects, better than the results of other evaluation studies. Key factors in the normalization process of the DOTTS in obstetric triage are the shared added value for stakeholders, the dedication of the complete multidisciplinary implementation team, and implementation plans that are tailor made in the practical context of the hospital.https://formative.jmir.org/2022/6/e33709
spellingShingle Bernice Engeltjes
Ageeth Rosman
Fedde Scheele
Christiaan Vis
Eveline Wouters
Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion
JMIR Formative Research
title Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion
title_full Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion
title_fullStr Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion
title_short Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion
title_sort evaluation of normalization after implementation of the digital dutch obstetric telephone triage system mixed methods study with a questionnaire survey and focus group discussion
url https://formative.jmir.org/2022/6/e33709
work_keys_str_mv AT berniceengeltjes evaluationofnormalizationafterimplementationofthedigitaldutchobstetrictelephonetriagesystemmixedmethodsstudywithaquestionnairesurveyandfocusgroupdiscussion
AT ageethrosman evaluationofnormalizationafterimplementationofthedigitaldutchobstetrictelephonetriagesystemmixedmethodsstudywithaquestionnairesurveyandfocusgroupdiscussion
AT feddescheele evaluationofnormalizationafterimplementationofthedigitaldutchobstetrictelephonetriagesystemmixedmethodsstudywithaquestionnairesurveyandfocusgroupdiscussion
AT christiaanvis evaluationofnormalizationafterimplementationofthedigitaldutchobstetrictelephonetriagesystemmixedmethodsstudywithaquestionnairesurveyandfocusgroupdiscussion
AT evelinewouters evaluationofnormalizationafterimplementationofthedigitaldutchobstetrictelephonetriagesystemmixedmethodsstudywithaquestionnairesurveyandfocusgroupdiscussion