Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection
<p>Images captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and processed by structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry are increasingly used in geomorphology to obtain high-resolution topography data. Conventional georeferencing using ground control points (GCPs) provides reliable positioning, but...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | Earth Surface Dynamics |
| Online Access: | https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/807/2019/esurf-7-807-2019.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818351836606758912 |
|---|---|
| author | H. Zhang E. Aldana-Jague F. Clapuyt F. Wilken F. Wilken V. Vanacker K. Van Oost K. Van Oost |
| author_facet | H. Zhang E. Aldana-Jague F. Clapuyt F. Wilken F. Wilken V. Vanacker K. Van Oost K. Van Oost |
| author_sort | H. Zhang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Images captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and
processed by structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry are increasingly
used in geomorphology to obtain high-resolution topography data.
Conventional georeferencing using ground control points (GCPs) provides
reliable positioning, but the geometrical accuracy critically depends on the
number and spatial layout of the GCPs. This limits the time and
cost effectiveness. Direct georeferencing of the UAV images with
differential GNSS, such as PPK (post-processing kinematic), may overcome
these limitations by providing accurate and directly georeferenced surveys.
To investigate the positional accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of
digital surface models (DSMs) generated by a UAV–PPK–SfM workflow, we
carried out multiple flight missions with two different camera–UAV systems:
a small-form low-cost micro-UAV equipped with a high field of view (FOV) action camera and a
professional UAV equipped with a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera. Our analysis showed that the
PPK solution provides the same accuracy (MAE: ca. 0.02 m, RMSE: ca. 0.03 m)
as the GCP method for both UAV systems. Our study demonstrated that a
UAV–PPK–SfM workflow can provide consistent, repeatable 4-D data with an
accuracy of a few centimeters. However, a few flights showed vertical bias
and this could be corrected using one single GCP. We further evaluated
different methods to estimate DSM uncertainty and show that this has a large
impact on centimeter-level topographical change detection. The DSM reconstruction
and surface change detection based on a DSLR and action camera were
reproducible: the main difference lies in the level of detail of the surface
representations. The PPK–SfM workflow in the context of 4-D Earth surface
monitoring should be considered an efficient tool to monitor geomorphic
processes accurately and quickly at a very high spatial and temporal
resolution.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T18:44:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-86ab6847f9c74982b8cf78617ac9e316 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2196-6311 2196-632X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T18:44:04Z |
| publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Earth Surface Dynamics |
| spelling | doaj.art-86ab6847f9c74982b8cf78617ac9e3162022-12-21T23:35:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2019-09-01780782710.5194/esurf-7-807-2019Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detectionH. Zhang0E. Aldana-Jague1F. Clapuyt2F. Wilken3F. Wilken4V. Vanacker5K. Van Oost6K. Van Oost7Earth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, BelgiumEarth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, BelgiumEarth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, BelgiumInstitute for Geography, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, 86159, GermanyDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandEarth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, BelgiumEarth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, BelgiumFonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS), Brussels, 1000, Belgium<p>Images captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and processed by structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry are increasingly used in geomorphology to obtain high-resolution topography data. Conventional georeferencing using ground control points (GCPs) provides reliable positioning, but the geometrical accuracy critically depends on the number and spatial layout of the GCPs. This limits the time and cost effectiveness. Direct georeferencing of the UAV images with differential GNSS, such as PPK (post-processing kinematic), may overcome these limitations by providing accurate and directly georeferenced surveys. To investigate the positional accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of digital surface models (DSMs) generated by a UAV–PPK–SfM workflow, we carried out multiple flight missions with two different camera–UAV systems: a small-form low-cost micro-UAV equipped with a high field of view (FOV) action camera and a professional UAV equipped with a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera. Our analysis showed that the PPK solution provides the same accuracy (MAE: ca. 0.02 m, RMSE: ca. 0.03 m) as the GCP method for both UAV systems. Our study demonstrated that a UAV–PPK–SfM workflow can provide consistent, repeatable 4-D data with an accuracy of a few centimeters. However, a few flights showed vertical bias and this could be corrected using one single GCP. We further evaluated different methods to estimate DSM uncertainty and show that this has a large impact on centimeter-level topographical change detection. The DSM reconstruction and surface change detection based on a DSLR and action camera were reproducible: the main difference lies in the level of detail of the surface representations. The PPK–SfM workflow in the context of 4-D Earth surface monitoring should be considered an efficient tool to monitor geomorphic processes accurately and quickly at a very high spatial and temporal resolution.</p>https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/807/2019/esurf-7-807-2019.pdf |
| spellingShingle | H. Zhang E. Aldana-Jague F. Clapuyt F. Wilken F. Wilken V. Vanacker K. Van Oost K. Van Oost Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection Earth Surface Dynamics |
| title | Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection |
| title_full | Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection |
| title_short | Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection |
| title_sort | evaluating the potential of post processing kinematic ppk georeferencing for uav based structure from motion sfm photogrammetry and surface change detection |
| url | https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/7/807/2019/esurf-7-807-2019.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hzhang evaluatingthepotentialofpostprocessingkinematicppkgeoreferencingforuavbasedstructurefrommotionsfmphotogrammetryandsurfacechangedetection AT ealdanajague evaluatingthepotentialofpostprocessingkinematicppkgeoreferencingforuavbasedstructurefrommotionsfmphotogrammetryandsurfacechangedetection AT fclapuyt evaluatingthepotentialofpostprocessingkinematicppkgeoreferencingforuavbasedstructurefrommotionsfmphotogrammetryandsurfacechangedetection AT fwilken evaluatingthepotentialofpostprocessingkinematicppkgeoreferencingforuavbasedstructurefrommotionsfmphotogrammetryandsurfacechangedetection AT fwilken evaluatingthepotentialofpostprocessingkinematicppkgeoreferencingforuavbasedstructurefrommotionsfmphotogrammetryandsurfacechangedetection AT vvanacker evaluatingthepotentialofpostprocessingkinematicppkgeoreferencingforuavbasedstructurefrommotionsfmphotogrammetryandsurfacechangedetection AT kvanoost evaluatingthepotentialofpostprocessingkinematicppkgeoreferencingforuavbasedstructurefrommotionsfmphotogrammetryandsurfacechangedetection AT kvanoost evaluatingthepotentialofpostprocessingkinematicppkgeoreferencingforuavbasedstructurefrommotionsfmphotogrammetryandsurfacechangedetection |