Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USA

Consumers desire low-input turfgrasses that have tolerance to both shade and drought stresses. Several sedges (Carex sp.) and nimblewill (Muhlenbergia schreberi) are native plants prevalent in dry woodland ecosystems in Oklahoma, USA, and may have potential as alternatives to conventional species in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Godwin Shokoya, Charles Fontanier, Dennis L. Martin, Bruce L. Dunn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) 2022-11-01
Series:HortTechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/32/6/article-p567.xml
_version_ 1811293089604567040
author Godwin Shokoya
Charles Fontanier
Dennis L. Martin
Bruce L. Dunn
author_facet Godwin Shokoya
Charles Fontanier
Dennis L. Martin
Bruce L. Dunn
author_sort Godwin Shokoya
collection DOAJ
description Consumers desire low-input turfgrasses that have tolerance to both shade and drought stresses. Several sedges (Carex sp.) and nimblewill (Muhlenbergia schreberi) are native plants prevalent in dry woodland ecosystems in Oklahoma, USA, and may have potential as alternatives to conventional species in dry shaded turfgrass systems. To evaluate selected species for this purpose, a multilocation field trial was conducted in Stillwater and Perkins, OK. Four sedges [gray sedge (Carex amphibola), Leavenworth’s sedge (Carex leavenworthii), ‘Little Midge’ palm sedge (Carex muskingumensis), and Texas sedge (Carex texensis)] and nimblewill were evaluated as alternative turfs for the study. Alternative turfs were compared against two conventional turfgrasses [‘El Toro’ Japanese lawngrass (Zoysia japonica) and ‘Riley’s Super Sport’ bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)]. The conventional turfgrasses outperformed each sedge and nimblewill in coverage and turf quality. Leavenworth’s sedge, gray sedge, and Texas sedge persisted well but did not spread quickly enough to achieve a dense canopy by the end of the 2-year trial. In contrast, nimblewill established quickly but declined in coverage over time. This study demonstrated some sedges and nimblewill can be established and maintained as a low-input turf in dry shade, but development of unique management practices is still required for acceptable performance.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:55:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86baf4fc0ee74f9e9e86eab82407ad9a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1943-7714
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:55:22Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)
record_format Article
series HortTechnology
spelling doaj.art-86baf4fc0ee74f9e9e86eab82407ad9a2022-12-22T03:01:30ZengAmerican Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)HortTechnology1943-77142022-11-01326https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05107-22Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USAGodwin ShokoyaCharles Fontanier Dennis L. MartinBruce L. DunnConsumers desire low-input turfgrasses that have tolerance to both shade and drought stresses. Several sedges (Carex sp.) and nimblewill (Muhlenbergia schreberi) are native plants prevalent in dry woodland ecosystems in Oklahoma, USA, and may have potential as alternatives to conventional species in dry shaded turfgrass systems. To evaluate selected species for this purpose, a multilocation field trial was conducted in Stillwater and Perkins, OK. Four sedges [gray sedge (Carex amphibola), Leavenworth’s sedge (Carex leavenworthii), ‘Little Midge’ palm sedge (Carex muskingumensis), and Texas sedge (Carex texensis)] and nimblewill were evaluated as alternative turfs for the study. Alternative turfs were compared against two conventional turfgrasses [‘El Toro’ Japanese lawngrass (Zoysia japonica) and ‘Riley’s Super Sport’ bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)]. The conventional turfgrasses outperformed each sedge and nimblewill in coverage and turf quality. Leavenworth’s sedge, gray sedge, and Texas sedge persisted well but did not spread quickly enough to achieve a dense canopy by the end of the 2-year trial. In contrast, nimblewill established quickly but declined in coverage over time. This study demonstrated some sedges and nimblewill can be established and maintained as a low-input turf in dry shade, but development of unique management practices is still required for acceptable performance.https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/32/6/article-p567.xmlgray sedgeground coverleavenworth’s sedgemuhlenbergia schreberinative plantpalm sedgetexas sedge
spellingShingle Godwin Shokoya
Charles Fontanier
Dennis L. Martin
Bruce L. Dunn
Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USA
HortTechnology
gray sedge
ground cover
leavenworth’s sedge
muhlenbergia schreberi
native plant
palm sedge
texas sedge
title Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USA
title_full Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USA
title_fullStr Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USA
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USA
title_short Evaluation of Sedges and Nimblewill as Low-input, Shaded Lawns in Oklahoma, USA
title_sort evaluation of sedges and nimblewill as low input shaded lawns in oklahoma usa
topic gray sedge
ground cover
leavenworth’s sedge
muhlenbergia schreberi
native plant
palm sedge
texas sedge
url https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/32/6/article-p567.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT godwinshokoya evaluationofsedgesandnimblewillaslowinputshadedlawnsinoklahomausa
AT charlesfontanier evaluationofsedgesandnimblewillaslowinputshadedlawnsinoklahomausa
AT dennislmartin evaluationofsedgesandnimblewillaslowinputshadedlawnsinoklahomausa
AT bruceldunn evaluationofsedgesandnimblewillaslowinputshadedlawnsinoklahomausa