Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle Penetration

Renewable energy sources and EV growth brings new challenges for grid stabilization. Smart grid techniques are required to reconfigure and compensate for load fluctuation and stabilize power losses and voltage fluctuation. Numerical tools are available to equip the smart grid to deal with such chall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farrukh Nagi, Aidil Azwin, Navaamsini Boopalan, Agileswari K. Ramasamy, Marayati Marsadek, Syed Khaleel Ahmed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/19/3221
_version_ 1797479729940398080
author Farrukh Nagi
Aidil Azwin
Navaamsini Boopalan
Agileswari K. Ramasamy
Marayati Marsadek
Syed Khaleel Ahmed
author_facet Farrukh Nagi
Aidil Azwin
Navaamsini Boopalan
Agileswari K. Ramasamy
Marayati Marsadek
Syed Khaleel Ahmed
author_sort Farrukh Nagi
collection DOAJ
description Renewable energy sources and EV growth brings new challenges for grid stabilization. Smart grid techniques are required to reconfigure and compensate for load fluctuation and stabilize power losses and voltage fluctuation. Numerical tools are available to equip the smart grid to deal with such challenges. Distribution Feeder reconfiguration and reactive voltage injection to the disturbed grid are some of the techniques employed for the purpose. However, either reconfiguration or injection alone is used commonly for this purpose. In this study, both techniques are applied to EV penetration as load and compared. A balanced IEEE 33 Radial network is used in this study and selected branches with high power losses are targeted for the reactive voltage injection and Minimum Spanning tree techniques (MST). EV charging loads are usually modelled with time base distribution which requires times base power flow analysis for reactive power injection. A comparison between coordinated, reconfiguration, and reactive voltage injection shows differences in power losses, voltage distortion, and cost saving. The analysis is carried out with an integer linear programming technique for coordinated charging, a minimum spanning tree for network reconfiguration, and genetic optimization for reactive power injection. Besides, all power flow analyses are carried out with the Backward/Forward sweep method. The information would help lowering power losses, grid stabilization, and charging station infrastructure planning.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T21:49:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86bd43062e8c424c8e8eae104e603152
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T21:49:58Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Electronics
spelling doaj.art-86bd43062e8c424c8e8eae104e6031522023-11-23T20:08:23ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922022-10-011119322110.3390/electronics11193221Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle PenetrationFarrukh Nagi0Aidil Azwin1Navaamsini Boopalan2Agileswari K. Ramasamy3Marayati Marsadek4Syed Khaleel Ahmed5Institute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 4300, Selangor, MalaysiaDepartment of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 4300, Selangor, MalaysiaDepartment of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 4300, Selangor, MalaysiaDepartment of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 4300, Selangor, MalaysiaInstitute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 4300, Selangor, MalaysiaC3, Alsa Towers, EVR Periyar Salai, Chetpet, Chennai 600010, IndiaRenewable energy sources and EV growth brings new challenges for grid stabilization. Smart grid techniques are required to reconfigure and compensate for load fluctuation and stabilize power losses and voltage fluctuation. Numerical tools are available to equip the smart grid to deal with such challenges. Distribution Feeder reconfiguration and reactive voltage injection to the disturbed grid are some of the techniques employed for the purpose. However, either reconfiguration or injection alone is used commonly for this purpose. In this study, both techniques are applied to EV penetration as load and compared. A balanced IEEE 33 Radial network is used in this study and selected branches with high power losses are targeted for the reactive voltage injection and Minimum Spanning tree techniques (MST). EV charging loads are usually modelled with time base distribution which requires times base power flow analysis for reactive power injection. A comparison between coordinated, reconfiguration, and reactive voltage injection shows differences in power losses, voltage distortion, and cost saving. The analysis is carried out with an integer linear programming technique for coordinated charging, a minimum spanning tree for network reconfiguration, and genetic optimization for reactive power injection. Besides, all power flow analyses are carried out with the Backward/Forward sweep method. The information would help lowering power losses, grid stabilization, and charging station infrastructure planning.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/19/3221distribution feeder reconfigurationminimum spanning treereactive power injectionforward/backward sweep power analysisIEEE 33 radial bus networkmixed integer linear
spellingShingle Farrukh Nagi
Aidil Azwin
Navaamsini Boopalan
Agileswari K. Ramasamy
Marayati Marsadek
Syed Khaleel Ahmed
Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle Penetration
Electronics
distribution feeder reconfiguration
minimum spanning tree
reactive power injection
forward/backward sweep power analysis
IEEE 33 radial bus network
mixed integer linear
title Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle Penetration
title_full Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle Penetration
title_fullStr Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle Penetration
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle Penetration
title_short Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle Penetration
title_sort comparison of grid reactive voltage regulation with reconfiguration network for electric vehicle penetration
topic distribution feeder reconfiguration
minimum spanning tree
reactive power injection
forward/backward sweep power analysis
IEEE 33 radial bus network
mixed integer linear
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/19/3221
work_keys_str_mv AT farrukhnagi comparisonofgridreactivevoltageregulationwithreconfigurationnetworkforelectricvehiclepenetration
AT aidilazwin comparisonofgridreactivevoltageregulationwithreconfigurationnetworkforelectricvehiclepenetration
AT navaamsiniboopalan comparisonofgridreactivevoltageregulationwithreconfigurationnetworkforelectricvehiclepenetration
AT agileswarikramasamy comparisonofgridreactivevoltageregulationwithreconfigurationnetworkforelectricvehiclepenetration
AT marayatimarsadek comparisonofgridreactivevoltageregulationwithreconfigurationnetworkforelectricvehiclepenetration
AT syedkhaleelahmed comparisonofgridreactivevoltageregulationwithreconfigurationnetworkforelectricvehiclepenetration