Maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment: a cost-minimization analysis among district hospitals in Nepal

Abstract Background About half of all medical devices in low- and lower-middle-income countries are currently non-operational because equipment maintenance is lacking. Thus, choosing a cost-efficient equipment maintenance approach has the potential to increase both the quantity and quality of import...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Hillebrecht, Constantin Schmidt, Bhim Prasad Saptoka, Josef Riha, Matthias Nachtnebel, Till Bärnighausen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-08-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08392-6
_version_ 1811320771992092672
author Michael Hillebrecht
Constantin Schmidt
Bhim Prasad Saptoka
Josef Riha
Matthias Nachtnebel
Till Bärnighausen
author_facet Michael Hillebrecht
Constantin Schmidt
Bhim Prasad Saptoka
Josef Riha
Matthias Nachtnebel
Till Bärnighausen
author_sort Michael Hillebrecht
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background About half of all medical devices in low- and lower-middle-income countries are currently non-operational because equipment maintenance is lacking. Thus, choosing a cost-efficient equipment maintenance approach has the potential to increase both the quantity and quality of important health services. Between 2010 and 2014 Nepal’s Ministry of Health chose two of its development regions to pilot the contracting-out of maintenance services to the private sector. We develop a cost model and employ different data to calculate the cost of this contracted-out scheme. The latter we compare with two additional common approaches to maintenance: in-house maintenance and no maintenance. Methods We use invoiced pilot program costs, device depreciation estimates from the literature, and hospital case numbers from Nepal’s Health Management Information System. We estimate net-present values for a three-year horizon, incorporating both fixed and operational cost. Operational costs include downtime cost measured as lost revenues due to non-working equipment. Results The contracted-out maintenance scheme shows a strong relative cost performance. Its cost after 3 years amount to 4,501,574 International Dollars Purchasing Power Parity (I$ PPP), only 90% of the cost with no maintenance. The contracted-out scheme incurs 670,288 I$ PPP and 3,765,360 I$ PPP in fixed cost and operational cost, respectively. The cost for replacing broken devices is 1,920,467 I$ PPP lower with maintenance. In addition, after 3 years total cost of contracted-out maintenance is 489,333 I$ PPP (11%) below total cost of decentralized in-house maintenance. After 10 years, contracted-out maintenance saves 2.5 million I$ PPP (18%) compared to no maintenance. Conclusions We find that contracted-out maintenance provides cost-efficient medical equipment maintenance in a lower-middle income context. Our findings contrast with studies from high- and upper-middle-income countries, which reflect contexts with more in-house engineering expertise than in our study area. Since the per hospital fixed cost decrease with scheme size, our results lend support to an expansion of contracted-out maintenance to the remaining three development regions in Nepal.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:05:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86c342d8893f46bf98be8ad562078fb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:05:17Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-86c342d8893f46bf98be8ad562078fb72022-12-22T02:45:47ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-08-012211910.1186/s12913-022-08392-6Maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment: a cost-minimization analysis among district hospitals in NepalMichael Hillebrecht0Constantin Schmidt1Bhim Prasad Saptoka2Josef Riha3Matthias Nachtnebel4Till Bärnighausen5Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg UniversityHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg UniversityHealth Coordination Division, Ministry of Health and PopulationManagement4healthHealth and Social Protection Asia, KfW Development BankHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg UniversityAbstract Background About half of all medical devices in low- and lower-middle-income countries are currently non-operational because equipment maintenance is lacking. Thus, choosing a cost-efficient equipment maintenance approach has the potential to increase both the quantity and quality of important health services. Between 2010 and 2014 Nepal’s Ministry of Health chose two of its development regions to pilot the contracting-out of maintenance services to the private sector. We develop a cost model and employ different data to calculate the cost of this contracted-out scheme. The latter we compare with two additional common approaches to maintenance: in-house maintenance and no maintenance. Methods We use invoiced pilot program costs, device depreciation estimates from the literature, and hospital case numbers from Nepal’s Health Management Information System. We estimate net-present values for a three-year horizon, incorporating both fixed and operational cost. Operational costs include downtime cost measured as lost revenues due to non-working equipment. Results The contracted-out maintenance scheme shows a strong relative cost performance. Its cost after 3 years amount to 4,501,574 International Dollars Purchasing Power Parity (I$ PPP), only 90% of the cost with no maintenance. The contracted-out scheme incurs 670,288 I$ PPP and 3,765,360 I$ PPP in fixed cost and operational cost, respectively. The cost for replacing broken devices is 1,920,467 I$ PPP lower with maintenance. In addition, after 3 years total cost of contracted-out maintenance is 489,333 I$ PPP (11%) below total cost of decentralized in-house maintenance. After 10 years, contracted-out maintenance saves 2.5 million I$ PPP (18%) compared to no maintenance. Conclusions We find that contracted-out maintenance provides cost-efficient medical equipment maintenance in a lower-middle income context. Our findings contrast with studies from high- and upper-middle-income countries, which reflect contexts with more in-house engineering expertise than in our study area. Since the per hospital fixed cost decrease with scheme size, our results lend support to an expansion of contracted-out maintenance to the remaining three development regions in Nepal.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08392-6NepalMaintenanceHealth managementHealth technologyAsset managementCosting study
spellingShingle Michael Hillebrecht
Constantin Schmidt
Bhim Prasad Saptoka
Josef Riha
Matthias Nachtnebel
Till Bärnighausen
Maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment: a cost-minimization analysis among district hospitals in Nepal
BMC Health Services Research
Nepal
Maintenance
Health management
Health technology
Asset management
Costing study
title Maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment: a cost-minimization analysis among district hospitals in Nepal
title_full Maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment: a cost-minimization analysis among district hospitals in Nepal
title_fullStr Maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment: a cost-minimization analysis among district hospitals in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment: a cost-minimization analysis among district hospitals in Nepal
title_short Maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment: a cost-minimization analysis among district hospitals in Nepal
title_sort maintenance versus replacement of medical equipment a cost minimization analysis among district hospitals in nepal
topic Nepal
Maintenance
Health management
Health technology
Asset management
Costing study
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08392-6
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelhillebrecht maintenanceversusreplacementofmedicalequipmentacostminimizationanalysisamongdistricthospitalsinnepal
AT constantinschmidt maintenanceversusreplacementofmedicalequipmentacostminimizationanalysisamongdistricthospitalsinnepal
AT bhimprasadsaptoka maintenanceversusreplacementofmedicalequipmentacostminimizationanalysisamongdistricthospitalsinnepal
AT josefriha maintenanceversusreplacementofmedicalequipmentacostminimizationanalysisamongdistricthospitalsinnepal
AT matthiasnachtnebel maintenanceversusreplacementofmedicalequipmentacostminimizationanalysisamongdistricthospitalsinnepal
AT tillbarnighausen maintenanceversusreplacementofmedicalequipmentacostminimizationanalysisamongdistricthospitalsinnepal