Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations

Abstract The article compares three influential theories used in sociology and psychology to categorize types of morality—Luc Boltanski & Laurent Thévenot’s justification theory, Shalom H. Schwartz’s basic human values theory, and Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory—to simplify the complex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tuukka Ylä-Anttila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2023-05-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01684-0
_version_ 1797832168591851520
author Tuukka Ylä-Anttila
author_facet Tuukka Ylä-Anttila
author_sort Tuukka Ylä-Anttila
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The article compares three influential theories used in sociology and psychology to categorize types of morality—Luc Boltanski & Laurent Thévenot’s justification theory, Shalom H. Schwartz’s basic human values theory, and Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory—to simplify the complexity presented by three different categorizations, while retaining necessary nuance, and to translate the concepts of each into the language of the other two. A comparative table is presented to evaluate which categories of the three theories correspond to each other and where do theories make distinctions that are lacking from the other two. This summary framework of Comparative Moral Principles (CMP) consists of eight principles to compare, explain, and interpret practices of moral motivation and meaning-making: Liberty, Inspiration, Safety, Community, Care, Equality, Deservingness, and Competition.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T14:04:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86d08434911942b98a75aecd39df61e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-9992
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T14:04:32Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj.art-86d08434911942b98a75aecd39df61e82023-05-07T11:08:58ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922023-05-0110111010.1057/s41599-023-01684-0Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundationsTuukka Ylä-Anttila0University of HelsinkiAbstract The article compares three influential theories used in sociology and psychology to categorize types of morality—Luc Boltanski & Laurent Thévenot’s justification theory, Shalom H. Schwartz’s basic human values theory, and Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory—to simplify the complexity presented by three different categorizations, while retaining necessary nuance, and to translate the concepts of each into the language of the other two. A comparative table is presented to evaluate which categories of the three theories correspond to each other and where do theories make distinctions that are lacking from the other two. This summary framework of Comparative Moral Principles (CMP) consists of eight principles to compare, explain, and interpret practices of moral motivation and meaning-making: Liberty, Inspiration, Safety, Community, Care, Equality, Deservingness, and Competition.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01684-0
spellingShingle Tuukka Ylä-Anttila
Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations
title_full Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations
title_fullStr Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations
title_full_unstemmed Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations
title_short Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations
title_sort comparative moral principles justifications values and foundations
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01684-0
work_keys_str_mv AT tuukkaylaanttila comparativemoralprinciplesjustificationsvaluesandfoundations