Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations
Abstract The article compares three influential theories used in sociology and psychology to categorize types of morality—Luc Boltanski & Laurent Thévenot’s justification theory, Shalom H. Schwartz’s basic human values theory, and Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory—to simplify the complex...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2023-05-01
|
Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01684-0 |
_version_ | 1797832168591851520 |
---|---|
author | Tuukka Ylä-Anttila |
author_facet | Tuukka Ylä-Anttila |
author_sort | Tuukka Ylä-Anttila |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract The article compares three influential theories used in sociology and psychology to categorize types of morality—Luc Boltanski & Laurent Thévenot’s justification theory, Shalom H. Schwartz’s basic human values theory, and Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory—to simplify the complexity presented by three different categorizations, while retaining necessary nuance, and to translate the concepts of each into the language of the other two. A comparative table is presented to evaluate which categories of the three theories correspond to each other and where do theories make distinctions that are lacking from the other two. This summary framework of Comparative Moral Principles (CMP) consists of eight principles to compare, explain, and interpret practices of moral motivation and meaning-making: Liberty, Inspiration, Safety, Community, Care, Equality, Deservingness, and Competition. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T14:04:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-86d08434911942b98a75aecd39df61e8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2662-9992 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T14:04:32Z |
publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
publisher | Springer Nature |
record_format | Article |
series | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
spelling | doaj.art-86d08434911942b98a75aecd39df61e82023-05-07T11:08:58ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922023-05-0110111010.1057/s41599-023-01684-0Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundationsTuukka Ylä-Anttila0University of HelsinkiAbstract The article compares three influential theories used in sociology and psychology to categorize types of morality—Luc Boltanski & Laurent Thévenot’s justification theory, Shalom H. Schwartz’s basic human values theory, and Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory—to simplify the complexity presented by three different categorizations, while retaining necessary nuance, and to translate the concepts of each into the language of the other two. A comparative table is presented to evaluate which categories of the three theories correspond to each other and where do theories make distinctions that are lacking from the other two. This summary framework of Comparative Moral Principles (CMP) consists of eight principles to compare, explain, and interpret practices of moral motivation and meaning-making: Liberty, Inspiration, Safety, Community, Care, Equality, Deservingness, and Competition.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01684-0 |
spellingShingle | Tuukka Ylä-Anttila Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
title | Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations |
title_full | Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations |
title_fullStr | Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations |
title_short | Comparative moral principles: justifications, values, and foundations |
title_sort | comparative moral principles justifications values and foundations |
url | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01684-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuukkaylaanttila comparativemoralprinciplesjustificationsvaluesandfoundations |