A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial
Background: Several grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge augmentation. The literature lacks researches to compare CenoBone to other grafting materials. The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveolar bone augmentation...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Dental Research Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2016;volume=13;issue=5;spage=446;epage=453;aulast=Amoian |
| _version_ | 1818537925376212992 |
|---|---|
| author | Babak Amoian Ehsan Moudi Maryam Seyed Majidi S M Ali Tabatabaei |
| author_facet | Babak Amoian Ehsan Moudi Maryam Seyed Majidi S M Ali Tabatabaei |
| author_sort | Babak Amoian |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Several grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge augmentation. The literature lacks researches to compare CenoBone to other grafting materials. The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveolar bone augmentation in terms of radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters.
Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, ten patients who needed lateral ridge augmentation were selected and augmentations were done using either of CenoBone/CenoMembrane or Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complexes. In the re-entry surgery in 6 months following augmentation, core biopsies were taken and clinical, radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations were performed.
Results: No statistically significant difference was seen between groups except for the number of blood vessels and percentage of residual graft materials.
Conclusion: CenoBone seems to present a comparable lateral ridge augmentation to Bio-Oss in. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:57:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-86d6d17f48474176a62b0da3199f37b9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1735-3327 2008-0255 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:57:00Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Dental Research Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-86d6d17f48474176a62b0da3199f37b92022-12-22T00:54:07ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552016-01-0113544645310.4103/1735-3327.192304A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trialBabak AmoianEhsan MoudiMaryam Seyed MajidiS M Ali TabatabaeiBackground: Several grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge augmentation. The literature lacks researches to compare CenoBone to other grafting materials. The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveolar bone augmentation in terms of radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, ten patients who needed lateral ridge augmentation were selected and augmentations were done using either of CenoBone/CenoMembrane or Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complexes. In the re-entry surgery in 6 months following augmentation, core biopsies were taken and clinical, radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations were performed. Results: No statistically significant difference was seen between groups except for the number of blood vessels and percentage of residual graft materials. Conclusion: CenoBone seems to present a comparable lateral ridge augmentation to Bio-Oss in.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2016;volume=13;issue=5;spage=446;epage=453;aulast=Amoianalveolar bone graftingalveolar ridge augmentationsbio-oss |
| spellingShingle | Babak Amoian Ehsan Moudi Maryam Seyed Majidi S M Ali Tabatabaei A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial Dental Research Journal alveolar bone grafting alveolar ridge augmentations bio-oss |
| title | A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial |
| title_full | A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial |
| title_fullStr | A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial |
| title_short | A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial |
| title_sort | histologic histomorphometric and radiographic comparison between two complexes of cenoboen cenomembrane and bio oss bio gide in lateral ridge augmentation a clinical trial |
| topic | alveolar bone grafting alveolar ridge augmentations bio-oss |
| url | http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2016;volume=13;issue=5;spage=446;epage=453;aulast=Amoian |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT babakamoian ahistologichistomorphometricandradiographiccomparisonbetweentwocomplexesofcenoboencenomembraneandbioossbiogideinlateralridgeaugmentationaclinicaltrial AT ehsanmoudi ahistologichistomorphometricandradiographiccomparisonbetweentwocomplexesofcenoboencenomembraneandbioossbiogideinlateralridgeaugmentationaclinicaltrial AT maryamseyedmajidi ahistologichistomorphometricandradiographiccomparisonbetweentwocomplexesofcenoboencenomembraneandbioossbiogideinlateralridgeaugmentationaclinicaltrial AT smalitabatabaei ahistologichistomorphometricandradiographiccomparisonbetweentwocomplexesofcenoboencenomembraneandbioossbiogideinlateralridgeaugmentationaclinicaltrial AT babakamoian histologichistomorphometricandradiographiccomparisonbetweentwocomplexesofcenoboencenomembraneandbioossbiogideinlateralridgeaugmentationaclinicaltrial AT ehsanmoudi histologichistomorphometricandradiographiccomparisonbetweentwocomplexesofcenoboencenomembraneandbioossbiogideinlateralridgeaugmentationaclinicaltrial AT maryamseyedmajidi histologichistomorphometricandradiographiccomparisonbetweentwocomplexesofcenoboencenomembraneandbioossbiogideinlateralridgeaugmentationaclinicaltrial AT smalitabatabaei histologichistomorphometricandradiographiccomparisonbetweentwocomplexesofcenoboencenomembraneandbioossbiogideinlateralridgeaugmentationaclinicaltrial |