Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland

Citizens outside of the built-up zone in the Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland are self-responsible to establish and maintain their water services. In response many independent, collective water schemes emerged in rural areas. We describe these schemes as commons, since citizens organize legal, institu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moritz Hofstetter, Alex Bolding, Rutgerd Boelens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) 2023-11-01
Series:International Journal of the Commons
Subjects:
Online Access:https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/1256
_version_ 1797382788660330496
author Moritz Hofstetter
Alex Bolding
Rutgerd Boelens
author_facet Moritz Hofstetter
Alex Bolding
Rutgerd Boelens
author_sort Moritz Hofstetter
collection DOAJ
description Citizens outside of the built-up zone in the Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland are self-responsible to establish and maintain their water services. In response many independent, collective water schemes emerged in rural areas. We describe these schemes as commons, since citizens organize legal, institutional, and infrastructural aspects of water access in a collective manner. Since the late 19th century such commons serving farming households have been subsidized by the State. In this article, we develop a conviviality lens to analyze how water commons are being supported and regulated by public institutions. We show how the introduction of neoliberal policy reforms summarized under the term New Public Management (NPM) put pressure on this public support. By describing a specific project in detail, we demonstrate how the failure of a market-modernist expertocracy to recognize these commons as alternative forms of social organization negatively affects their viability. We argue that for the proliferation of these commons their complexity, networked autonomy, and rooted notions of belonging need to be recognised.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:10:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-86dafe627b5c40b7b4e6b5c7802f4e51
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1875-0281
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:10:32Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
record_format Article
series International Journal of the Commons
spelling doaj.art-86dafe627b5c40b7b4e6b5c7802f4e512023-12-22T06:34:07ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812023-11-01171375–389375–38910.5334/ijc.12561100Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural SwitzerlandMoritz Hofstetter0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4348-0847Alex Bolding1Rutgerd Boelens2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8412-3109Water Resources Management Group, Wageningen UniversityWater Resources Management Group, Wageningen UniversityWater Resources Management Group, Wageningen University; Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation, University of AmsterdamCitizens outside of the built-up zone in the Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland are self-responsible to establish and maintain their water services. In response many independent, collective water schemes emerged in rural areas. We describe these schemes as commons, since citizens organize legal, institutional, and infrastructural aspects of water access in a collective manner. Since the late 19th century such commons serving farming households have been subsidized by the State. In this article, we develop a conviviality lens to analyze how water commons are being supported and regulated by public institutions. We show how the introduction of neoliberal policy reforms summarized under the term New Public Management (NPM) put pressure on this public support. By describing a specific project in detail, we demonstrate how the failure of a market-modernist expertocracy to recognize these commons as alternative forms of social organization negatively affects their viability. We argue that for the proliferation of these commons their complexity, networked autonomy, and rooted notions of belonging need to be recognised.https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/1256convivialitycommonsswitzerlandwatermodernismexpertocracy
spellingShingle Moritz Hofstetter
Alex Bolding
Rutgerd Boelens
Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland
International Journal of the Commons
conviviality
commons
switzerland
water
modernism
expertocracy
title Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland
title_full Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland
title_fullStr Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland
title_short Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland
title_sort conviviality under pressure of market modernist expertocracy the case of water commons in rural switzerland
topic conviviality
commons
switzerland
water
modernism
expertocracy
url https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/1256
work_keys_str_mv AT moritzhofstetter convivialityunderpressureofmarketmodernistexpertocracythecaseofwatercommonsinruralswitzerland
AT alexbolding convivialityunderpressureofmarketmodernistexpertocracythecaseofwatercommonsinruralswitzerland
AT rutgerdboelens convivialityunderpressureofmarketmodernistexpertocracythecaseofwatercommonsinruralswitzerland