Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland
Citizens outside of the built-up zone in the Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland are self-responsible to establish and maintain their water services. In response many independent, collective water schemes emerged in rural areas. We describe these schemes as commons, since citizens organize legal, institu...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
2023-11-01
|
Series: | International Journal of the Commons |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/1256 |
_version_ | 1797382788660330496 |
---|---|
author | Moritz Hofstetter Alex Bolding Rutgerd Boelens |
author_facet | Moritz Hofstetter Alex Bolding Rutgerd Boelens |
author_sort | Moritz Hofstetter |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Citizens outside of the built-up zone in the Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland are self-responsible to establish and maintain their water services. In response many independent, collective water schemes emerged in rural areas. We describe these schemes as commons, since citizens organize legal, institutional, and infrastructural aspects of water access in a collective manner. Since the late 19th century such commons serving farming households have been subsidized by the State. In this article, we develop a conviviality lens to analyze how water commons are being supported and regulated by public institutions. We show how the introduction of neoliberal policy reforms summarized under the term New Public Management (NPM) put pressure on this public support. By describing a specific project in detail, we demonstrate how the failure of a market-modernist expertocracy to recognize these commons as alternative forms of social organization negatively affects their viability. We argue that for the proliferation of these commons their complexity, networked autonomy, and rooted notions of belonging need to be recognised. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:10:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-86dafe627b5c40b7b4e6b5c7802f4e51 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1875-0281 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:10:32Z |
publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
publisher | Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of the Commons |
spelling | doaj.art-86dafe627b5c40b7b4e6b5c7802f4e512023-12-22T06:34:07ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812023-11-01171375–389375–38910.5334/ijc.12561100Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural SwitzerlandMoritz Hofstetter0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4348-0847Alex Bolding1Rutgerd Boelens2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8412-3109Water Resources Management Group, Wageningen UniversityWater Resources Management Group, Wageningen UniversityWater Resources Management Group, Wageningen University; Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation, University of AmsterdamCitizens outside of the built-up zone in the Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland are self-responsible to establish and maintain their water services. In response many independent, collective water schemes emerged in rural areas. We describe these schemes as commons, since citizens organize legal, institutional, and infrastructural aspects of water access in a collective manner. Since the late 19th century such commons serving farming households have been subsidized by the State. In this article, we develop a conviviality lens to analyze how water commons are being supported and regulated by public institutions. We show how the introduction of neoliberal policy reforms summarized under the term New Public Management (NPM) put pressure on this public support. By describing a specific project in detail, we demonstrate how the failure of a market-modernist expertocracy to recognize these commons as alternative forms of social organization negatively affects their viability. We argue that for the proliferation of these commons their complexity, networked autonomy, and rooted notions of belonging need to be recognised.https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/1256convivialitycommonsswitzerlandwatermodernismexpertocracy |
spellingShingle | Moritz Hofstetter Alex Bolding Rutgerd Boelens Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland International Journal of the Commons conviviality commons switzerland water modernism expertocracy |
title | Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland |
title_full | Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland |
title_fullStr | Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland |
title_full_unstemmed | Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland |
title_short | Conviviality Under Pressure of Market-Modernist Expertocracy: The Case of Water Commons in Rural Switzerland |
title_sort | conviviality under pressure of market modernist expertocracy the case of water commons in rural switzerland |
topic | conviviality commons switzerland water modernism expertocracy |
url | https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/1256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moritzhofstetter convivialityunderpressureofmarketmodernistexpertocracythecaseofwatercommonsinruralswitzerland AT alexbolding convivialityunderpressureofmarketmodernistexpertocracythecaseofwatercommonsinruralswitzerland AT rutgerdboelens convivialityunderpressureofmarketmodernistexpertocracythecaseofwatercommonsinruralswitzerland |