<i>In silico</i> allergen identification: Proposal for a revision of FAO/WHO guidelines

Allergy is a widespread, often severe health problem. <i>In vivo</i> or <i>in vitro</i> identification of new allergenic proteins (natural or bioengineered) is time- and resource-consuming, and <i>in vivo</i> testing can be dangerous. Thus, allergenicity predictio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fabrizio Guarneri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti 2010-10-01
Series:Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti : Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1478/C1A1002006
_version_ 1811205832548810752
author Fabrizio Guarneri
author_facet Fabrizio Guarneri
author_sort Fabrizio Guarneri
collection DOAJ
description Allergy is a widespread, often severe health problem. <i>In vivo</i> or <i>in vitro</i> identification of new allergenic proteins (natural or bioengineered) is time- and resource-consuming, and <i>in vivo</i> testing can be dangerous. Thus, allergenicity prediction through computation (<i>in silico</i>) was proposed to narrow down the number of potential allergens to be tested with traditional methods. In 2001, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) officially defined guidelines for <i>in silico</i> allergenicity prediction, based on amino acid sequence similarity to known allergens; these guidelines, however, have been criticized because of frequent false positives. In the present work, the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) software was used to compare known and potential allergens, and select only statistically significant homologies (i.e. homologies whose <i>E</i> value, calculated by BLAST, was < 1); FAO/WHO rules were then applied to these homologies. With this method, correct recognition of all known allergens, with only 10 false positives (1.26% of all predicted allergens) was achieved when using an upper limit of 0.1 for <i>E</i> values; complete suppression of wrong predictions, while maintaining 100% sensitivity, was obtained with little modifications of the minimum requirements contained in the FAO/WHO guidelines.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:37:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-871577136a0d4836bec23860e1943cb2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0365-0359
1825-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:37:44Z
publishDate 2010-10-01
publisher Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti
record_format Article
series Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti : Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali
spelling doaj.art-871577136a0d4836bec23860e1943cb22022-12-22T03:49:22ZengAccademia Peloritana dei PericolantiAtti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti : Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali0365-03591825-12422010-10-01LXXXVIII2C1A1002006<i>In silico</i> allergen identification: Proposal for a revision of FAO/WHO guidelinesFabrizio GuarneriAllergy is a widespread, often severe health problem. <i>In vivo</i> or <i>in vitro</i> identification of new allergenic proteins (natural or bioengineered) is time- and resource-consuming, and <i>in vivo</i> testing can be dangerous. Thus, allergenicity prediction through computation (<i>in silico</i>) was proposed to narrow down the number of potential allergens to be tested with traditional methods. In 2001, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) officially defined guidelines for <i>in silico</i> allergenicity prediction, based on amino acid sequence similarity to known allergens; these guidelines, however, have been criticized because of frequent false positives. In the present work, the BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) software was used to compare known and potential allergens, and select only statistically significant homologies (i.e. homologies whose <i>E</i> value, calculated by BLAST, was < 1); FAO/WHO rules were then applied to these homologies. With this method, correct recognition of all known allergens, with only 10 false positives (1.26% of all predicted allergens) was achieved when using an upper limit of 0.1 for <i>E</i> values; complete suppression of wrong predictions, while maintaining 100% sensitivity, was obtained with little modifications of the minimum requirements contained in the FAO/WHO guidelines.http://dx.doi.org/10.1478/C1A1002006Life Sciences
spellingShingle Fabrizio Guarneri
<i>In silico</i> allergen identification: Proposal for a revision of FAO/WHO guidelines
Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti : Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali
Life Sciences
title <i>In silico</i> allergen identification: Proposal for a revision of FAO/WHO guidelines
title_full <i>In silico</i> allergen identification: Proposal for a revision of FAO/WHO guidelines
title_fullStr <i>In silico</i> allergen identification: Proposal for a revision of FAO/WHO guidelines
title_full_unstemmed <i>In silico</i> allergen identification: Proposal for a revision of FAO/WHO guidelines
title_short <i>In silico</i> allergen identification: Proposal for a revision of FAO/WHO guidelines
title_sort i in silico i allergen identification proposal for a revision of fao who guidelines
topic Life Sciences
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1478/C1A1002006
work_keys_str_mv AT fabrizioguarneri iinsilicoiallergenidentificationproposalforarevisionoffaowhoguidelines