Falls prevention in rural general practice: what stands the test of time and where to from here?
Abstract Objective: General practitioner recall of the 1992–96 ‘Stay on Your Feet’ (SOYF) program and its influence on practice were surveyed five years post‐intervention to gauge sustainability of the SOYF General Practice (GP) component. Methods: A survey assessed which SOYF components were still...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2003-10-01
|
| Series: | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00818.x |
| _version_ | 1797761926579617792 |
|---|---|
| author | Lisa Barnett Eric vanBeurden Elizabeth Eakin Uta Dietrich John Beard Beth Newman |
| author_facet | Lisa Barnett Eric vanBeurden Elizabeth Eakin Uta Dietrich John Beard Beth Newman |
| author_sort | Lisa Barnett |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Objective: General practitioner recall of the 1992–96 ‘Stay on Your Feet’ (SOYF) program and its influence on practice were surveyed five years post‐intervention to gauge sustainability of the SOYF General Practice (GP) component. Methods: A survey assessed which SOYF components were still in existence, current practice related to falls prevention, and interest in professional development. All general practitioners (GPs) situated within the boundaries of a rural Area Health Service were mailed a survey in late 2001. Results: Response rate was 66.5% (139/209). Of 117 GPs in practice at the time of SOYF, 80.2% reported having heard of SOYF and 74.4% of those felt it had influenced practice. Half (50.9%) still had a copy of the SOYF GP resource and of those, 58.6% used it at least ‘occasionally’. Three‐quarters of GPs surveyed (75.2%) checked medications ‘most/almost all’ of the time with patients over 60 years; 46.7% assessed falls risk factors; 41.3% gave advice; and 22.6% referred to allied health practitioners. GPs indicated a strong interest in falls prevention‐related professional development. There was no significant association between use of the SOYF resource package and any of the current falls prevention practices (all χ2 >0.05). Conclusions and implications: There was high recall of SOYF and a general belief that it influenced practice. There was little indication that use of the resource had any lasting influence on GPs' practices. In future, careful thought needs to go into designing a program that has potential to affect long‐term change in GPs' falls prevention practice. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T19:20:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-87349eef878d401897f3fad0c009db62 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1326-0200 1753-6405 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T19:20:00Z |
| publishDate | 2003-10-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-87349eef878d401897f3fad0c009db622023-08-02T05:14:35ZengElsevierAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052003-10-0127548148510.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00818.xFalls prevention in rural general practice: what stands the test of time and where to from here?Lisa Barnett0Eric vanBeurden1Elizabeth Eakin2Uta Dietrich3John Beard4Beth Newman5Northern Rivers Area Health Service, New South WalesNorthern Rivers Area Health Service, New South WalesQueensland University of TechnologyNorthern Rivers Area Health Service, New South WalesNorthern Rivers University Department of Rural Health, New South WalesQueensland University of TechnologyAbstract Objective: General practitioner recall of the 1992–96 ‘Stay on Your Feet’ (SOYF) program and its influence on practice were surveyed five years post‐intervention to gauge sustainability of the SOYF General Practice (GP) component. Methods: A survey assessed which SOYF components were still in existence, current practice related to falls prevention, and interest in professional development. All general practitioners (GPs) situated within the boundaries of a rural Area Health Service were mailed a survey in late 2001. Results: Response rate was 66.5% (139/209). Of 117 GPs in practice at the time of SOYF, 80.2% reported having heard of SOYF and 74.4% of those felt it had influenced practice. Half (50.9%) still had a copy of the SOYF GP resource and of those, 58.6% used it at least ‘occasionally’. Three‐quarters of GPs surveyed (75.2%) checked medications ‘most/almost all’ of the time with patients over 60 years; 46.7% assessed falls risk factors; 41.3% gave advice; and 22.6% referred to allied health practitioners. GPs indicated a strong interest in falls prevention‐related professional development. There was no significant association between use of the SOYF resource package and any of the current falls prevention practices (all χ2 >0.05). Conclusions and implications: There was high recall of SOYF and a general belief that it influenced practice. There was little indication that use of the resource had any lasting influence on GPs' practices. In future, careful thought needs to go into designing a program that has potential to affect long‐term change in GPs' falls prevention practice.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00818.x |
| spellingShingle | Lisa Barnett Eric vanBeurden Elizabeth Eakin Uta Dietrich John Beard Beth Newman Falls prevention in rural general practice: what stands the test of time and where to from here? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health |
| title | Falls prevention in rural general practice: what stands the test of time and where to from here? |
| title_full | Falls prevention in rural general practice: what stands the test of time and where to from here? |
| title_fullStr | Falls prevention in rural general practice: what stands the test of time and where to from here? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Falls prevention in rural general practice: what stands the test of time and where to from here? |
| title_short | Falls prevention in rural general practice: what stands the test of time and where to from here? |
| title_sort | falls prevention in rural general practice what stands the test of time and where to from here |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00818.x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lisabarnett fallspreventioninruralgeneralpracticewhatstandsthetestoftimeandwheretofromhere AT ericvanbeurden fallspreventioninruralgeneralpracticewhatstandsthetestoftimeandwheretofromhere AT elizabetheakin fallspreventioninruralgeneralpracticewhatstandsthetestoftimeandwheretofromhere AT utadietrich fallspreventioninruralgeneralpracticewhatstandsthetestoftimeandwheretofromhere AT johnbeard fallspreventioninruralgeneralpracticewhatstandsthetestoftimeandwheretofromhere AT bethnewman fallspreventioninruralgeneralpracticewhatstandsthetestoftimeandwheretofromhere |