17p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, represents the therapeutic gold standard for more than 2 decades in this pathology, when used in combination with chemotherapy. However, some patients experience treatmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristina Bagacean, Adrian Tempescul, David Ternant, Anne Banet, Nathalie Douet-Guilbert, Anne Bordron, Boutahar Bendaoud, Hussam Saad, Mihnea Zdrenghea, Christian Berthou, Gilles Paintaud, Yves Renaudineau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-01
Series:Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40425-019-0509-0
_version_ 1818538769516593152
author Cristina Bagacean
Adrian Tempescul
David Ternant
Anne Banet
Nathalie Douet-Guilbert
Anne Bordron
Boutahar Bendaoud
Hussam Saad
Mihnea Zdrenghea
Christian Berthou
Gilles Paintaud
Yves Renaudineau
author_facet Cristina Bagacean
Adrian Tempescul
David Ternant
Anne Banet
Nathalie Douet-Guilbert
Anne Bordron
Boutahar Bendaoud
Hussam Saad
Mihnea Zdrenghea
Christian Berthou
Gilles Paintaud
Yves Renaudineau
author_sort Cristina Bagacean
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, represents the therapeutic gold standard for more than 2 decades in this pathology, when used in combination with chemotherapy. However, some patients experience treatment resistance or rapid relapses, and in particular, those harboring a 17p/TP53 deletion (del(17p)). This resistance could be explained by a chemo-resistance, but it could also result from the direct impact of del(17p) on the pharmacokinetics of rituximab, which represents the aim of the present study. Accordingly, 44 CLL patients were included in the study, and among them 9 presented a del(17p). Next, a total of 233 rituximab sera were selected for a pharmacokinetic study and analyzed in a two-compartment model showing important differences when del(17p) CLL patients were compared with non-del(17p) patients treated with rituximab and chemotherapy: (1) clearance of rituximab was faster; (2) central volume of rituximab distribution V1 (peripheral blood) was reduced while peripheral volume V2 (lymphoid organs and tissues) was increased; and (3) the rate of rituximab elimination (Kout) was faster. In contrast, the group with a better prognosis harboring isolated del(13q) presented a slower rate of elimination (Kout). Pharmacokinetic parameters were independent from the other factors tested such as age, sex, chemotherapy regimen (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide versus bendamustine), IGHV mutational status, and FCGR3A 158VF status. In conclusion, this study provides an additional argument to consider that del(17p) is effective not only to control chemoresistance but also monoclonal antibody activity, based on higher rituximab turnover.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:33:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-874ce61e568a46c38d593ea120b275c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2051-1426
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:33:15Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
spelling doaj.art-874ce61e568a46c38d593ea120b275c22022-12-22T00:50:05ZengBMJ Publishing GroupJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer2051-14262019-01-01711510.1186/s40425-019-0509-017p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemiaCristina Bagacean0Adrian Tempescul1David Ternant2Anne Banet3Nathalie Douet-Guilbert4Anne Bordron5Boutahar Bendaoud6Hussam Saad7Mihnea Zdrenghea8Christian Berthou9Gilles Paintaud10Yves Renaudineau11U1227 B Lymphocytes and Autoimmunity, University of Brest; INSERM; networks IC-CGO and REpiCGO from “Canceropole Grand Ouest”U1227 B Lymphocytes and Autoimmunity, University of Brest; INSERM; networks IC-CGO and REpiCGO from “Canceropole Grand Ouest”University of Tours, EA 7501 Innovation and Cell Targeting Group, CHRU de Tours, Laboratory of Pharmacology-ToxicologyDepartment of Hematology, Brest University Medical School HospitalLaboratory of Cytogenetics, Brest University Medical School HospitalU1227 B Lymphocytes and Autoimmunity, University of Brest; INSERM; networks IC-CGO and REpiCGO from “Canceropole Grand Ouest”Laboratory of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Brest University Medical School HospitalDepartment of Hematology, Brest University Medical School Hospital“Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and PharmacyU1227 B Lymphocytes and Autoimmunity, University of Brest; INSERM; networks IC-CGO and REpiCGO from “Canceropole Grand Ouest”University of Tours, EA 7501 Innovation and Cell Targeting Group, CHRU de Tours, Laboratory of Pharmacology-ToxicologyLaboratory of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Brest University Medical School HospitalAbstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, represents the therapeutic gold standard for more than 2 decades in this pathology, when used in combination with chemotherapy. However, some patients experience treatment resistance or rapid relapses, and in particular, those harboring a 17p/TP53 deletion (del(17p)). This resistance could be explained by a chemo-resistance, but it could also result from the direct impact of del(17p) on the pharmacokinetics of rituximab, which represents the aim of the present study. Accordingly, 44 CLL patients were included in the study, and among them 9 presented a del(17p). Next, a total of 233 rituximab sera were selected for a pharmacokinetic study and analyzed in a two-compartment model showing important differences when del(17p) CLL patients were compared with non-del(17p) patients treated with rituximab and chemotherapy: (1) clearance of rituximab was faster; (2) central volume of rituximab distribution V1 (peripheral blood) was reduced while peripheral volume V2 (lymphoid organs and tissues) was increased; and (3) the rate of rituximab elimination (Kout) was faster. In contrast, the group with a better prognosis harboring isolated del(13q) presented a slower rate of elimination (Kout). Pharmacokinetic parameters were independent from the other factors tested such as age, sex, chemotherapy regimen (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide versus bendamustine), IGHV mutational status, and FCGR3A 158VF status. In conclusion, this study provides an additional argument to consider that del(17p) is effective not only to control chemoresistance but also monoclonal antibody activity, based on higher rituximab turnover.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40425-019-0509-0Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaAnti-CD20 monoclonal antibodyRituximabPharmacokineticsClearance17p deletion
spellingShingle Cristina Bagacean
Adrian Tempescul
David Ternant
Anne Banet
Nathalie Douet-Guilbert
Anne Bordron
Boutahar Bendaoud
Hussam Saad
Mihnea Zdrenghea
Christian Berthou
Gilles Paintaud
Yves Renaudineau
17p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody
Rituximab
Pharmacokinetics
Clearance
17p deletion
title 17p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
title_full 17p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
title_fullStr 17p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
title_full_unstemmed 17p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
title_short 17p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
title_sort 17p deletion strongly influences rituximab elimination in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
topic Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody
Rituximab
Pharmacokinetics
Clearance
17p deletion
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40425-019-0509-0
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinabagacean 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT adriantempescul 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT davidternant 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT annebanet 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT nathaliedouetguilbert 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT annebordron 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT boutaharbendaoud 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT hussamsaad 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT mihneazdrenghea 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT christianberthou 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT gillespaintaud 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT yvesrenaudineau 17pdeletionstronglyinfluencesrituximabeliminationinchroniclymphocyticleukemia