Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania

Abstract Background A three-dimensional window screen (3D-Screen) has been developed to create a window double-screen trap (3D-WDST), effectively capturing and preventing the escape of mosquitoes. A 2015 laboratory study demonstrated the 3D-Screen's efficacy, capturing 92% of mosquitoes in a do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Subam Kathet, Wema Sudi, Victor Mwingira, Patrick Tungu, Mikko Aalto, Tomi Hakala, Markku Honkala, Robert Malima, William Kisinza, Seppo Meri, Ayman Khattab
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06032-4
_version_ 1827724342816931840
author Subam Kathet
Wema Sudi
Victor Mwingira
Patrick Tungu
Mikko Aalto
Tomi Hakala
Markku Honkala
Robert Malima
William Kisinza
Seppo Meri
Ayman Khattab
author_facet Subam Kathet
Wema Sudi
Victor Mwingira
Patrick Tungu
Mikko Aalto
Tomi Hakala
Markku Honkala
Robert Malima
William Kisinza
Seppo Meri
Ayman Khattab
author_sort Subam Kathet
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background A three-dimensional window screen (3D-Screen) has been developed to create a window double-screen trap (3D-WDST), effectively capturing and preventing the escape of mosquitoes. A 2015 laboratory study demonstrated the 3D-Screen's efficacy, capturing 92% of mosquitoes in a double-screen setup during wind tunnel assays. To further evaluate its effectiveness, phase II experimental hut trials were conducted in Muheza, Tanzania. Methods Three experimental hut trials were carried out between 2016 and 2017. Trial I tested two versions of the 3D-WDST in huts with open or closed eaves, with one version using a single 3D-Screen and the other using two 3D-Screens. Trial II examined the 3D-WDST with two 3D-Screens in huts with or without baffles, while Trial III compared handmade and machine-made 3D structures. Mosquito capturing efficacy of the 3D-WDST was measured by comparing the number of mosquitoes collected in the test hut to a control hut with standard exit traps. Results Trial I showed that the 3D-WDST with two 3D-Screens used in huts with open eaves achieved the highest mosquito-capturing efficacy. This treatment captured 33.11% (CI 7.40–58.81) of female anophelines relative to the total collected in this hut (3D-WDST and room collections) and 27.27% (CI 4.23–50.31) of female anophelines relative to the total collected in the control hut (exit traps, room, and verandahs collections). In Trial II, the two 3D-Screens version of the 3D-WDST captured 70.32% (CI 56.87–83.77) and 51.07% (CI 21.72–80.41) of female anophelines in huts with and without baffles, respectively. Compared to the control hut, the capturing efficacy for female anophelines was 138.6% (37.23–239.9) and 42.41% (14.77–70.05) for huts with and without baffles, respectively. Trial III demonstrated similar performance between hand- and machine-made 3D structures. Conclusions The 3D-WDST proved effective in capturing malaria vectors under semi-field experimental hut conditions. Using 3D-Screens on both sides of the window openings was more effective than using a single-sided 3D-Screen. Additionally, both hand- and machine-made 3D structures exhibited equally effective performance, supporting the production of durable cones on an industrial scale for future large-scale studies evaluating the 3D-WDST at the community level. Graphical Abstract
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:13:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-875a867100534b38bcad28dc241db76f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-3305
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:13:27Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Parasites & Vectors
spelling doaj.art-875a867100534b38bcad28dc241db76f2023-11-19T12:31:14ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052023-11-0116112210.1186/s13071-023-06032-4Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern TanzaniaSubam Kathet0Wema Sudi1Victor Mwingira2Patrick Tungu3Mikko Aalto4Tomi Hakala5Markku Honkala6Robert Malima7William Kisinza8Seppo Meri9Ayman Khattab10Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, and Translational Immunology Research Program, University of HelsinkiAmani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical ResearchAmani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical ResearchAmani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical ResearchEast Africa UniversityDepartment of Materials Science, Tampere University of TechnologyDepartment of Materials Science, Tampere University of TechnologyAmani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical ResearchAmani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical ResearchDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, and Translational Immunology Research Program, University of HelsinkiDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, and Translational Immunology Research Program, University of HelsinkiAbstract Background A three-dimensional window screen (3D-Screen) has been developed to create a window double-screen trap (3D-WDST), effectively capturing and preventing the escape of mosquitoes. A 2015 laboratory study demonstrated the 3D-Screen's efficacy, capturing 92% of mosquitoes in a double-screen setup during wind tunnel assays. To further evaluate its effectiveness, phase II experimental hut trials were conducted in Muheza, Tanzania. Methods Three experimental hut trials were carried out between 2016 and 2017. Trial I tested two versions of the 3D-WDST in huts with open or closed eaves, with one version using a single 3D-Screen and the other using two 3D-Screens. Trial II examined the 3D-WDST with two 3D-Screens in huts with or without baffles, while Trial III compared handmade and machine-made 3D structures. Mosquito capturing efficacy of the 3D-WDST was measured by comparing the number of mosquitoes collected in the test hut to a control hut with standard exit traps. Results Trial I showed that the 3D-WDST with two 3D-Screens used in huts with open eaves achieved the highest mosquito-capturing efficacy. This treatment captured 33.11% (CI 7.40–58.81) of female anophelines relative to the total collected in this hut (3D-WDST and room collections) and 27.27% (CI 4.23–50.31) of female anophelines relative to the total collected in the control hut (exit traps, room, and verandahs collections). In Trial II, the two 3D-Screens version of the 3D-WDST captured 70.32% (CI 56.87–83.77) and 51.07% (CI 21.72–80.41) of female anophelines in huts with and without baffles, respectively. Compared to the control hut, the capturing efficacy for female anophelines was 138.6% (37.23–239.9) and 42.41% (14.77–70.05) for huts with and without baffles, respectively. Trial III demonstrated similar performance between hand- and machine-made 3D structures. Conclusions The 3D-WDST proved effective in capturing malaria vectors under semi-field experimental hut conditions. Using 3D-Screens on both sides of the window openings was more effective than using a single-sided 3D-Screen. Additionally, both hand- and machine-made 3D structures exhibited equally effective performance, supporting the production of durable cones on an industrial scale for future large-scale studies evaluating the 3D-WDST at the community level. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06032-4MalariaAnophelesMosquito controlWindow double screens3D-Screens3D-WDST
spellingShingle Subam Kathet
Wema Sudi
Victor Mwingira
Patrick Tungu
Mikko Aalto
Tomi Hakala
Markku Honkala
Robert Malima
William Kisinza
Seppo Meri
Ayman Khattab
Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania
Parasites & Vectors
Malaria
Anopheles
Mosquito control
Window double screens
3D-Screens
3D-WDST
title Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania
title_full Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania
title_fullStr Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania
title_short Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania
title_sort efficacy of 3d screens for sustainable mosquito control a semi field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern tanzania
topic Malaria
Anopheles
Mosquito control
Window double screens
3D-Screens
3D-WDST
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06032-4
work_keys_str_mv AT subamkathet efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT wemasudi efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT victormwingira efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT patricktungu efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT mikkoaalto efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT tomihakala efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT markkuhonkala efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT robertmalima efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT williamkisinza efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT seppomeri efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania
AT aymankhattab efficacyof3dscreensforsustainablemosquitocontrolasemifieldexperimentalhutevaluationinnortheasterntanzania