Aesthetics of Tourism according to Kant`s Attitude to the Nature in Critique of Judgment
interaction between sciences and philosophy In this research, we intend to examine Immanuel Kant's definition of nature in his critique of judgment in both parts, i.e., aesthetics and teleology. Then, we will evaluate these definitions of nature with the criteria of different trends of tour...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_13484_b02d5b06d784a336fcf32dc3cd5984f2.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797704935555465216 |
|---|---|
| author | Farideh Afarin Bita Abde Nikfarjam |
| author_facet | Farideh Afarin Bita Abde Nikfarjam |
| author_sort | Farideh Afarin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | interaction between sciences and philosophy
In this research, we intend to examine Immanuel Kant's definition of nature in his critique of judgment in both parts, i.e., aesthetics and teleology. Then, we will evaluate these definitions of nature with the criteria of different trends of tourism such as nature tourism. Then we answer the question: Do Kant's definitions of nature in teleology and the relationship of nature with beauty and sublimity and the examples mentioned in this book, provide a proper Criteria for the goals, aspirations, and scopes of nature tourism? Do tourists of nature take us for a walk in the nature that Kant defines or sometimes describes? Supposedly, both have a lot in common with emphasis on human ends and the importance of morality in praising beauty of nature. We search with a descriptive-analytical method to answer this question: How can a framework for aesthetics of tourism be provided from Kant's third critique? Research studies show that in order to organize the framework of aesthetics of tourism based on Kant's third critique, it is better to first outline the basic rubrics of the critique of the teleological judgment. In the second part of the third critique, considering the organic position of nature and its purpose and also the mechanistic expansion of nature under the supersensible principle, while eliminating the contradiction of this duality, the role of the purpose of nature and human as the ultimate purpose are discussed. In this part, an expansive view is seen for the relationship between man and nature with regard to the ultimate purpose and final purpose. According to the general point of view, human being, from the purposes and recognizing his/her position as the ultimate purpose and paying attention to the final purpose, will reach to a more detailed point of view. Human being, reflects on natural effects and charms and free and dependent beauties based on nature, artifacts and artworks. As a result, the role of beauty and sublimity of nature in cultivating the moral dimension and the promotion of human culture is considered as one of the basic foundations of aesthetics of tourism, especially nature tourism. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:27:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-876cc797a1b143a1ba7c76ffa6763e99 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2251-7960 2423-4419 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:27:48Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
| spelling | doaj.art-876cc797a1b143a1ba7c76ffa6763e992023-09-03T07:12:37ZengUniversity of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen LanguagesJournal of Philosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192021-12-01153754657910.22034/jpiut.2021.46631.287513484Aesthetics of Tourism according to Kant`s Attitude to the Nature in Critique of JudgmentFarideh Afarin0Bita Abde Nikfarjam1Assistant Prof. Art Studies Department, Semnan University, Semnan, IranM. A. of Art Studies, Semnan University, Semnan, Iraninteraction between sciences and philosophy In this research, we intend to examine Immanuel Kant's definition of nature in his critique of judgment in both parts, i.e., aesthetics and teleology. Then, we will evaluate these definitions of nature with the criteria of different trends of tourism such as nature tourism. Then we answer the question: Do Kant's definitions of nature in teleology and the relationship of nature with beauty and sublimity and the examples mentioned in this book, provide a proper Criteria for the goals, aspirations, and scopes of nature tourism? Do tourists of nature take us for a walk in the nature that Kant defines or sometimes describes? Supposedly, both have a lot in common with emphasis on human ends and the importance of morality in praising beauty of nature. We search with a descriptive-analytical method to answer this question: How can a framework for aesthetics of tourism be provided from Kant's third critique? Research studies show that in order to organize the framework of aesthetics of tourism based on Kant's third critique, it is better to first outline the basic rubrics of the critique of the teleological judgment. In the second part of the third critique, considering the organic position of nature and its purpose and also the mechanistic expansion of nature under the supersensible principle, while eliminating the contradiction of this duality, the role of the purpose of nature and human as the ultimate purpose are discussed. In this part, an expansive view is seen for the relationship between man and nature with regard to the ultimate purpose and final purpose. According to the general point of view, human being, from the purposes and recognizing his/her position as the ultimate purpose and paying attention to the final purpose, will reach to a more detailed point of view. Human being, reflects on natural effects and charms and free and dependent beauties based on nature, artifacts and artworks. As a result, the role of beauty and sublimity of nature in cultivating the moral dimension and the promotion of human culture is considered as one of the basic foundations of aesthetics of tourism, especially nature tourism.https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_13484_b02d5b06d784a336fcf32dc3cd5984f2.pdfnatureaesthetics of tourismkantteleologynature tourism |
| spellingShingle | Farideh Afarin Bita Abde Nikfarjam Aesthetics of Tourism according to Kant`s Attitude to the Nature in Critique of Judgment Journal of Philosophical Investigations nature aesthetics of tourism kant teleology nature tourism |
| title | Aesthetics of Tourism according to Kant`s Attitude to the Nature in Critique of Judgment |
| title_full | Aesthetics of Tourism according to Kant`s Attitude to the Nature in Critique of Judgment |
| title_fullStr | Aesthetics of Tourism according to Kant`s Attitude to the Nature in Critique of Judgment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aesthetics of Tourism according to Kant`s Attitude to the Nature in Critique of Judgment |
| title_short | Aesthetics of Tourism according to Kant`s Attitude to the Nature in Critique of Judgment |
| title_sort | aesthetics of tourism according to kant s attitude to the nature in critique of judgment |
| topic | nature aesthetics of tourism kant teleology nature tourism |
| url | https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_13484_b02d5b06d784a336fcf32dc3cd5984f2.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT faridehafarin aestheticsoftourismaccordingtokantsattitudetothenatureincritiqueofjudgment AT bitaabdenikfarjam aestheticsoftourismaccordingtokantsattitudetothenatureincritiqueofjudgment |