Eesti keele otseste eriküsilausete sõnajärje aspekte

Estonian is a verb-second (V2) language: in certain types of sentences, the finite verb tends to be the second constituent. The V2 feature of Estonian is most likely to have developed under Germanic influence. However, there are differences between Germanic and Estonian V2 order. The word order of E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heete Sahkai, Anne Tamm, Anders Holmberg
Format: Article
Language:Estonian
Published: SA Kultuurileht 2023-10-01
Series:Keel ja Kirjandus
Subjects:
Online Access:https://keeljakirjandus.ee/ee/archives/35887
_version_ 1797326800537255936
author Heete Sahkai
Anne Tamm
Anders Holmberg
author_facet Heete Sahkai
Anne Tamm
Anders Holmberg
author_sort Heete Sahkai
collection DOAJ
description Estonian is a verb-second (V2) language: in certain types of sentences, the finite verb tends to be the second constituent. The V2 feature of Estonian is most likely to have developed under Germanic influence. However, there are differences between Germanic and Estonian V2 order. The word order of Estonian main-clause wh-interrogatives is one of the major exceptions to the V2 order. Main-clause wh-interrogatives are always V2 in Germanic but predominantly verb-final in Estonian. The paper describes two corpus studies – a synchronic and a diachronic one – that aimed to clarify the proportion, nature and development of the V2 order in Estonian main-clause wh-interrogatives. The synchronic study showed that the proportion of the V2 order in present-day Estonian main-clause wh-interrogatives is approximately 22%. The V2 order is thus considerably less frequent in wh-interrogatives than in declaratives, but it is subject to similar prosodic exceptions in both. The V2 order is nevertheless more frequent in main-clause wh-interrogatives than in embedded wh-interrogatives and relative clauses, giving evidence of a Germanic-like asymmetry between main and embedded clauses. The results of the diachronic study suggest that the V2 order has never been borrowed as the predominant order of Estonian main-clause wh-interrogatives. To explain why the V2 feature was borrowed to a different extent into declaratives and wh-interrogatives, we hypothesise that their word order had already diverged before the V2 order was borrowed. According to the hypothesis, wh-interrogatives had retained the historical verb-final order, which remained unaffected by the V2 order, while declaratives had already lost the verb-final order.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:29:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-876ed8ed5a83486683333d5ecf681f06
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0131-1441
2346-6014
language Estonian
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:29:23Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher SA Kultuurileht
record_format Article
series Keel ja Kirjandus
spelling doaj.art-876ed8ed5a83486683333d5ecf681f062024-02-03T12:17:26ZestSA KultuurilehtKeel ja Kirjandus0131-14412346-60142023-10-016610987100610.54013/kk790a3Eesti keele otseste eriküsilausete sõnajärje aspekteHeete Sahkai 0Anne Tamm 1Anders Holmberg2Institute of the Estonian LanguageKároli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in HungaryNewcastle UniversityEstonian is a verb-second (V2) language: in certain types of sentences, the finite verb tends to be the second constituent. The V2 feature of Estonian is most likely to have developed under Germanic influence. However, there are differences between Germanic and Estonian V2 order. The word order of Estonian main-clause wh-interrogatives is one of the major exceptions to the V2 order. Main-clause wh-interrogatives are always V2 in Germanic but predominantly verb-final in Estonian. The paper describes two corpus studies – a synchronic and a diachronic one – that aimed to clarify the proportion, nature and development of the V2 order in Estonian main-clause wh-interrogatives. The synchronic study showed that the proportion of the V2 order in present-day Estonian main-clause wh-interrogatives is approximately 22%. The V2 order is thus considerably less frequent in wh-interrogatives than in declaratives, but it is subject to similar prosodic exceptions in both. The V2 order is nevertheless more frequent in main-clause wh-interrogatives than in embedded wh-interrogatives and relative clauses, giving evidence of a Germanic-like asymmetry between main and embedded clauses. The results of the diachronic study suggest that the V2 order has never been borrowed as the predominant order of Estonian main-clause wh-interrogatives. To explain why the V2 feature was borrowed to a different extent into declaratives and wh-interrogatives, we hypothesise that their word order had already diverged before the V2 order was borrowed. According to the hypothesis, wh-interrogatives had retained the historical verb-final order, which remained unaffected by the V2 order, while declaratives had already lost the verb-final order.https://keeljakirjandus.ee/ee/archives/35887verb second (v2)language contactlanguage historygermanic ­languagesprosodycorpus studylinguistics
spellingShingle Heete Sahkai
Anne Tamm
Anders Holmberg
Eesti keele otseste eriküsilausete sõnajärje aspekte
Keel ja Kirjandus
verb second (v2)
language contact
language history
germanic ­languages
prosody
corpus study
linguistics
title Eesti keele otseste eriküsilausete sõnajärje aspekte
title_full Eesti keele otseste eriküsilausete sõnajärje aspekte
title_fullStr Eesti keele otseste eriküsilausete sõnajärje aspekte
title_full_unstemmed Eesti keele otseste eriküsilausete sõnajärje aspekte
title_short Eesti keele otseste eriküsilausete sõnajärje aspekte
title_sort eesti keele otseste erikusilausete sonajarje aspekte
topic verb second (v2)
language contact
language history
germanic ­languages
prosody
corpus study
linguistics
url https://keeljakirjandus.ee/ee/archives/35887
work_keys_str_mv AT heetesahkai eestikeeleotsesteerikusilausetesonajarjeaspekte
AT annetamm eestikeeleotsesteerikusilausetesonajarjeaspekte
AT andersholmberg eestikeeleotsesteerikusilausetesonajarjeaspekte