Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi Publik
Dispute public information (SIP) is a dispute between public agencies and users of public information relating to the right to obtain and use information based on legislation (Article 1 paragraph (5) Act No.14 of 2008 on KIP). With the enactment of Act No.14 of 2008 on KIP then the rising powers in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Negeri Semarang
2013-04-01
|
| Series: | Unnes Law Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ulj/article/view/2905 |
| _version_ | 1797754335743967232 |
|---|---|
| author | Riscan Naelufar |
| author_facet | Riscan Naelufar |
| author_sort | Riscan Naelufar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Dispute public information (SIP) is a dispute between public agencies and users of public information relating to the right to obtain and use information based on legislation (Article 1 paragraph (5) Act No.14 of 2008 on KIP). With the enactment of Act No.14 of 2008 on KIP then the rising powers in the administrative court judge SIP. Problems were taken in this study is (1). How does the settlement process SIP Information Commission (2). How SIP Settlement Process in the Administrative Court (3). Ideal model to resolve SIP. This research Qualitative Deskripsif normative juridical approach to the type and validity of the data using triangulation techniques. The results showed that the process of finalizing the SIP through the Commission resolved a lot of information with non-litigation mediation than in adjudication, but related to non-litigation adjudication in the proposed appeal to the administrative court in the administrative court can be solved by using the Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2011 as procedural law. In connection with the completion of the SIP through both institutions komparasikan then the next will be to find a model or an ideal policy to resolve SIP and looking for a rule of law relating to legal ambiguity contained in Act No.14 of 2008 vis-Ã -vis the Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2011. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:31:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-877766194757415b92e6596150379e8c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2252-6536 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:31:41Z |
| publishDate | 2013-04-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Negeri Semarang |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Unnes Law Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-877766194757415b92e6596150379e8c2023-08-04T18:02:54ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangUnnes Law Journal2252-65362013-04-0121647210.15294/ulj.v2i1.29052905Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi PublikRiscan NaelufarDispute public information (SIP) is a dispute between public agencies and users of public information relating to the right to obtain and use information based on legislation (Article 1 paragraph (5) Act No.14 of 2008 on KIP). With the enactment of Act No.14 of 2008 on KIP then the rising powers in the administrative court judge SIP. Problems were taken in this study is (1). How does the settlement process SIP Information Commission (2). How SIP Settlement Process in the Administrative Court (3). Ideal model to resolve SIP. This research Qualitative Deskripsif normative juridical approach to the type and validity of the data using triangulation techniques. The results showed that the process of finalizing the SIP through the Commission resolved a lot of information with non-litigation mediation than in adjudication, but related to non-litigation adjudication in the proposed appeal to the administrative court in the administrative court can be solved by using the Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2011 as procedural law. In connection with the completion of the SIP through both institutions komparasikan then the next will be to find a model or an ideal policy to resolve SIP and looking for a rule of law relating to legal ambiguity contained in Act No.14 of 2008 vis-Ã -vis the Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2011.https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ulj/article/view/2905dispute public informationthe state administrative court |
| spellingShingle | Riscan Naelufar Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi Publik Unnes Law Journal dispute public information the state administrative court |
| title | Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi Publik |
| title_full | Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi Publik |
| title_fullStr | Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi Publik |
| title_full_unstemmed | Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi Publik |
| title_short | Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi Publik |
| title_sort | perluasan kompetensi ptun dalam mengadili sengketa informasi publik |
| topic | dispute public information the state administrative court |
| url | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ulj/article/view/2905 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT riscannaelufar perluasankompetensiptundalammengadilisengketainformasipublik |