Provider-led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in Malawi: Retrospective cohort study of retention, viral load suppression and costs.
<h4>Background</h4>Outcomes of community antiretroviral therapy (ART) distribution (CAD), in which provider-led ART teams deliver integrated HIV services at health posts in communities, have been mixed in sub-Saharan African countries. CAD outcomes and costs relative to facility-based ca...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
Series: | PLOS Global Public Health |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002081 |
_version_ | 1797648305267671040 |
---|---|
author | John Songo Hannah S Whitehead Brooke E Nichols Amos Makwaya Joseph Njala Sam Phiri Risa M Hoffman Kathryn Dovel Khumbo Phiri Joep J van Oosterhout |
author_facet | John Songo Hannah S Whitehead Brooke E Nichols Amos Makwaya Joseph Njala Sam Phiri Risa M Hoffman Kathryn Dovel Khumbo Phiri Joep J van Oosterhout |
author_sort | John Songo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Background</h4>Outcomes of community antiretroviral therapy (ART) distribution (CAD), in which provider-led ART teams deliver integrated HIV services at health posts in communities, have been mixed in sub-Saharan African countries. CAD outcomes and costs relative to facility-based care have not been reported from Malawi.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a retrospective cohort study in two Malawian districts (Lilongwe and Chikwawa districts), comparing CAD with facility-based ART care. We selected an equal number of clients in CAD and facility-based care who were aged >13 years, had an undetectable viral load (VL) result in the last year and were stable on first-line ART for ≥1 year. We compared retention in care (alive and no period of ≥60 days without ART) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression and maintenance of VL suppression (<1,000 copies/mL) during follow-up using logistic regression. We also compared costs (in US$) from the health system and client perspectives for the two models of care. Data were collected in October and November 2020.<h4>Results</h4>700 ART clients (350 CAD, 350 facility-based) were included. The median age was 43 years (IQR 36-51), median duration on ART was 7 years (IQR 4-9), and 75% were female. Retention in care did not differ significantly between clients in CAD (89.4% retained) and facility-based care (89.3%), p = 0.95. No significant difference in maintenance of VL suppression were observed between CAD and facility-based care (aOR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.47-3.20, p = 0.70). CAD resulted in slightly higher health system costs than facility-based care: $118/year vs. $108/year per person accessing care; and $133/year vs. $122/year per person retained in care. CAD decreased individual client costs compared to facility-based care: $3.20/year vs. $11.40/year per person accessing care; and $3.60/year vs. $12.90/year per person retained in care.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Clients in provider-led CAD care in Malawi had very good retention in care and VL suppression outcomes, similar to clients receiving facility-based care. While health system costs were somewhat higher with CAD, costs for clients were reduced substantially. More research is needed to understand the impact of other differentiated service delivery models on costs for the health system and clients. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T15:30:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8782581fd23746c48a2a84087940168a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2767-3375 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T15:30:12Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLOS Global Public Health |
spelling | doaj.art-8782581fd23746c48a2a84087940168a2023-10-27T05:55:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLOS Global Public Health2767-33752023-01-0139e000208110.1371/journal.pgph.0002081Provider-led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in Malawi: Retrospective cohort study of retention, viral load suppression and costs.John SongoHannah S WhiteheadBrooke E NicholsAmos MakwayaJoseph NjalaSam PhiriRisa M HoffmanKathryn DovelKhumbo PhiriJoep J van Oosterhout<h4>Background</h4>Outcomes of community antiretroviral therapy (ART) distribution (CAD), in which provider-led ART teams deliver integrated HIV services at health posts in communities, have been mixed in sub-Saharan African countries. CAD outcomes and costs relative to facility-based care have not been reported from Malawi.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a retrospective cohort study in two Malawian districts (Lilongwe and Chikwawa districts), comparing CAD with facility-based ART care. We selected an equal number of clients in CAD and facility-based care who were aged >13 years, had an undetectable viral load (VL) result in the last year and were stable on first-line ART for ≥1 year. We compared retention in care (alive and no period of ≥60 days without ART) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression and maintenance of VL suppression (<1,000 copies/mL) during follow-up using logistic regression. We also compared costs (in US$) from the health system and client perspectives for the two models of care. Data were collected in October and November 2020.<h4>Results</h4>700 ART clients (350 CAD, 350 facility-based) were included. The median age was 43 years (IQR 36-51), median duration on ART was 7 years (IQR 4-9), and 75% were female. Retention in care did not differ significantly between clients in CAD (89.4% retained) and facility-based care (89.3%), p = 0.95. No significant difference in maintenance of VL suppression were observed between CAD and facility-based care (aOR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.47-3.20, p = 0.70). CAD resulted in slightly higher health system costs than facility-based care: $118/year vs. $108/year per person accessing care; and $133/year vs. $122/year per person retained in care. CAD decreased individual client costs compared to facility-based care: $3.20/year vs. $11.40/year per person accessing care; and $3.60/year vs. $12.90/year per person retained in care.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Clients in provider-led CAD care in Malawi had very good retention in care and VL suppression outcomes, similar to clients receiving facility-based care. While health system costs were somewhat higher with CAD, costs for clients were reduced substantially. More research is needed to understand the impact of other differentiated service delivery models on costs for the health system and clients.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002081 |
spellingShingle | John Songo Hannah S Whitehead Brooke E Nichols Amos Makwaya Joseph Njala Sam Phiri Risa M Hoffman Kathryn Dovel Khumbo Phiri Joep J van Oosterhout Provider-led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in Malawi: Retrospective cohort study of retention, viral load suppression and costs. PLOS Global Public Health |
title | Provider-led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in Malawi: Retrospective cohort study of retention, viral load suppression and costs. |
title_full | Provider-led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in Malawi: Retrospective cohort study of retention, viral load suppression and costs. |
title_fullStr | Provider-led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in Malawi: Retrospective cohort study of retention, viral load suppression and costs. |
title_full_unstemmed | Provider-led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in Malawi: Retrospective cohort study of retention, viral load suppression and costs. |
title_short | Provider-led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in Malawi: Retrospective cohort study of retention, viral load suppression and costs. |
title_sort | provider led community antiretroviral therapy distribution in malawi retrospective cohort study of retention viral load suppression and costs |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsongo providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT hannahswhitehead providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT brookeenichols providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT amosmakwaya providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT josephnjala providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT samphiri providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT risamhoffman providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT kathryndovel providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT khumbophiri providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts AT joepjvanoosterhout providerledcommunityantiretroviraltherapydistributioninmalawiretrospectivecohortstudyofretentionviralloadsuppressionandcosts |