Comparisons of simulated radiation, surface wind stress and SST fields over tropical pacific by the GISS CMIP6 versions of global climate models with observations

This study compares the overall performance between versions 2.1 and 3 of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) global climate models (referred to as GISS-E2.1 and GISS-E3, respectively), in simulating the present-day Pacific climate using th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J-L F Li, Gregory V Cesana, Kuan-Man Xu, Mark Richardson, Hanii Takahashi, J Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Communications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/aca9ab
_version_ 1797844611704553472
author J-L F Li
Gregory V Cesana
Kuan-Man Xu
Mark Richardson
Hanii Takahashi
J Jiang
author_facet J-L F Li
Gregory V Cesana
Kuan-Man Xu
Mark Richardson
Hanii Takahashi
J Jiang
author_sort J-L F Li
collection DOAJ
description This study compares the overall performance between versions 2.1 and 3 of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) global climate models (referred to as GISS-E2.1 and GISS-E3, respectively), in simulating the present-day Pacific climate using the CMIP6 protocol. Model physical representations and configurations are extensively changed from GISS-E2.1 to GISS-E3, which result in greatly reduced discrepancies, including ice water path (IWP), ice water content (IWC), radiative fluxes, surface wind stress (TAU), sea surface temperature (SST), precipitation (PR) and column water vapor (PRW), relative to satellite-based observational products over south Pacific oceans. Cloud only IWP (CIWP) shows the largest change, decreasing biases from ∼400 g kg ^−1 in GISS-E2.1 to 10–20 g kg ^−1 in GISS-E3. The combination of improved CIWP and the inclusion of snow in GISS-E3 may play roles on reducing overestimated outgoing longwave radiation, overestimated reflected shortwave at the top of atmosphere, and underestimated surface downward shortwave in GISS-E2.1. Both models’ intertropical convergence zones (ITCZs) are, however, located far too north of the equator, as found in radiative fluxes, PR and PRW but not in SST relative to observations. This introduces biases in TAU, PR and PRW over north flank of the equator and north Pacific. Over south Pacific, especially the trade wind regions, the improvements of radiation fluxes, SST, PR and PRW appear to be due to improved TAU associated with inclusion of snow-radiative effects. In particular, GISS-E3 reduces a longstanding too warm SST bias over trade-wind regions, from 4 K in GISS-E2.1 to within 0.5 K, and too cold SST bias over north Pacific Ocean. Although GISS-E3 shows improved geographic patterns of the simulated fields in particular over south Pacific oceans compared to GISS-E2.1, our results suggest that the location of ITCZ needs to be further improved.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:25:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-878835ddc1c540ec8a316ea959c65ab4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2515-7620
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:25:05Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Communications
spelling doaj.art-878835ddc1c540ec8a316ea959c65ab42023-04-18T14:10:14ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Communications2515-76202023-01-015101500510.1088/2515-7620/aca9abComparisons of simulated radiation, surface wind stress and SST fields over tropical pacific by the GISS CMIP6 versions of global climate models with observationsJ-L F Li0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1294-9526Gregory V Cesana1Kuan-Man Xu2Mark Richardson3Hanii Takahashi4J Jiang5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-8951Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California, United States of AmericaCenter for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University , New York, New York, United States of America; NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York City, New York, United States of AmericaScience Directorate, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, United States of AmericaJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California, United States of AmericaJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California, United States of AmericaJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California, United States of AmericaThis study compares the overall performance between versions 2.1 and 3 of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) global climate models (referred to as GISS-E2.1 and GISS-E3, respectively), in simulating the present-day Pacific climate using the CMIP6 protocol. Model physical representations and configurations are extensively changed from GISS-E2.1 to GISS-E3, which result in greatly reduced discrepancies, including ice water path (IWP), ice water content (IWC), radiative fluxes, surface wind stress (TAU), sea surface temperature (SST), precipitation (PR) and column water vapor (PRW), relative to satellite-based observational products over south Pacific oceans. Cloud only IWP (CIWP) shows the largest change, decreasing biases from ∼400 g kg ^−1 in GISS-E2.1 to 10–20 g kg ^−1 in GISS-E3. The combination of improved CIWP and the inclusion of snow in GISS-E3 may play roles on reducing overestimated outgoing longwave radiation, overestimated reflected shortwave at the top of atmosphere, and underestimated surface downward shortwave in GISS-E2.1. Both models’ intertropical convergence zones (ITCZs) are, however, located far too north of the equator, as found in radiative fluxes, PR and PRW but not in SST relative to observations. This introduces biases in TAU, PR and PRW over north flank of the equator and north Pacific. Over south Pacific, especially the trade wind regions, the improvements of radiation fluxes, SST, PR and PRW appear to be due to improved TAU associated with inclusion of snow-radiative effects. In particular, GISS-E3 reduces a longstanding too warm SST bias over trade-wind regions, from 4 K in GISS-E2.1 to within 0.5 K, and too cold SST bias over north Pacific Ocean. Although GISS-E3 shows improved geographic patterns of the simulated fields in particular over south Pacific oceans compared to GISS-E2.1, our results suggest that the location of ITCZ needs to be further improved.https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/aca9abGISS-E2.1GISS-E3tropical pacific climateice water contentradiationsurface wind stress and sea surface temperatures
spellingShingle J-L F Li
Gregory V Cesana
Kuan-Man Xu
Mark Richardson
Hanii Takahashi
J Jiang
Comparisons of simulated radiation, surface wind stress and SST fields over tropical pacific by the GISS CMIP6 versions of global climate models with observations
Environmental Research Communications
GISS-E2.1
GISS-E3
tropical pacific climate
ice water content
radiation
surface wind stress and sea surface temperatures
title Comparisons of simulated radiation, surface wind stress and SST fields over tropical pacific by the GISS CMIP6 versions of global climate models with observations
title_full Comparisons of simulated radiation, surface wind stress and SST fields over tropical pacific by the GISS CMIP6 versions of global climate models with observations
title_fullStr Comparisons of simulated radiation, surface wind stress and SST fields over tropical pacific by the GISS CMIP6 versions of global climate models with observations
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of simulated radiation, surface wind stress and SST fields over tropical pacific by the GISS CMIP6 versions of global climate models with observations
title_short Comparisons of simulated radiation, surface wind stress and SST fields over tropical pacific by the GISS CMIP6 versions of global climate models with observations
title_sort comparisons of simulated radiation surface wind stress and sst fields over tropical pacific by the giss cmip6 versions of global climate models with observations
topic GISS-E2.1
GISS-E3
tropical pacific climate
ice water content
radiation
surface wind stress and sea surface temperatures
url https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/aca9ab
work_keys_str_mv AT jlfli comparisonsofsimulatedradiationsurfacewindstressandsstfieldsovertropicalpacificbythegisscmip6versionsofglobalclimatemodelswithobservations
AT gregoryvcesana comparisonsofsimulatedradiationsurfacewindstressandsstfieldsovertropicalpacificbythegisscmip6versionsofglobalclimatemodelswithobservations
AT kuanmanxu comparisonsofsimulatedradiationsurfacewindstressandsstfieldsovertropicalpacificbythegisscmip6versionsofglobalclimatemodelswithobservations
AT markrichardson comparisonsofsimulatedradiationsurfacewindstressandsstfieldsovertropicalpacificbythegisscmip6versionsofglobalclimatemodelswithobservations
AT haniitakahashi comparisonsofsimulatedradiationsurfacewindstressandsstfieldsovertropicalpacificbythegisscmip6versionsofglobalclimatemodelswithobservations
AT jjiang comparisonsofsimulatedradiationsurfacewindstressandsstfieldsovertropicalpacificbythegisscmip6versionsofglobalclimatemodelswithobservations