Sensitivity of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Plants Secondary Metabolites, for an Alternative Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cattle

Boophilus (Rhipicephalus) microplus is a one host hard tick widespread in warm climates worldwide, responsible for great economic losses. To avoid resistance in ticks population, induced by the repeated administration of conventional acaricides and/or the presence of residues in the environment in m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simona Nardoni, Valentina V. Ebani, Carlo D’Ascenzi, Luisa Pistelli, Francesca Mancianti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2018.00937/full
_version_ 1818931515342454784
author Simona Nardoni
Simona Nardoni
Valentina V. Ebani
Valentina V. Ebani
Carlo D’Ascenzi
Carlo D’Ascenzi
Luisa Pistelli
Luisa Pistelli
Francesca Mancianti
Francesca Mancianti
author_facet Simona Nardoni
Simona Nardoni
Valentina V. Ebani
Valentina V. Ebani
Carlo D’Ascenzi
Carlo D’Ascenzi
Luisa Pistelli
Luisa Pistelli
Francesca Mancianti
Francesca Mancianti
author_sort Simona Nardoni
collection DOAJ
description Boophilus (Rhipicephalus) microplus is a one host hard tick widespread in warm climates worldwide, responsible for great economic losses. To avoid resistance in ticks population, induced by the repeated administration of conventional acaricides and/or the presence of residues in the environment in meat and in milk, an alternative approach can be achieved using entomopathogenic microorganisms such as fungi and bacteria, or essential oils (EOs). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro sensitivity of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, Scopulariopsis sp, Bacillus thuringiensis and Proteus mirabilis to Eucalyptus globulus, Lavandula hybrida, Pelargonium graveolens EOs and to their main constituents such as lynalool, linalyl-acetate, geraniol, citronellol and 1,8 cineole. EOs has been chemically characterized by GC-MS. Fungal isolates were tested by a microdilution assay to achieve minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of both EOs and main components. The sensitivity of bacteria was evaluated by an agar disk diffusion. The results obtained show the feasibility of an integrate approach for an eco-friendly control of R. microplus by use of both entomopathogenic fungi and P. graveolens EO. L. hybrida could be an interesting alternative when B. bassiana is not employed. Conversely, a combined use of B. thuringiensis and EOs would not be advisable in the integrate control of ticks.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:17:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8790a0a76ebb405ebcadaf6904dbd26c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:17:49Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-8790a0a76ebb405ebcadaf6904dbd26c2022-12-21T19:53:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122018-08-01910.3389/fphar.2018.00937409266Sensitivity of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Plants Secondary Metabolites, for an Alternative Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in CattleSimona Nardoni0Simona Nardoni1Valentina V. Ebani2Valentina V. Ebani3Carlo D’Ascenzi4Carlo D’Ascenzi5Luisa Pistelli6Luisa Pistelli7Francesca Mancianti8Francesca Mancianti9Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyCentro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca “Nutraceutica e Alimentazione per la Salute”, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyCentro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca “Nutraceutica e Alimentazione per la Salute”, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyCentro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca “Nutraceutica e Alimentazione per la Salute”, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyCentro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca “Nutraceutica e Alimentazione per la Salute”, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyDipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyCentro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca “Nutraceutica e Alimentazione per la Salute”, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyBoophilus (Rhipicephalus) microplus is a one host hard tick widespread in warm climates worldwide, responsible for great economic losses. To avoid resistance in ticks population, induced by the repeated administration of conventional acaricides and/or the presence of residues in the environment in meat and in milk, an alternative approach can be achieved using entomopathogenic microorganisms such as fungi and bacteria, or essential oils (EOs). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro sensitivity of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, Scopulariopsis sp, Bacillus thuringiensis and Proteus mirabilis to Eucalyptus globulus, Lavandula hybrida, Pelargonium graveolens EOs and to their main constituents such as lynalool, linalyl-acetate, geraniol, citronellol and 1,8 cineole. EOs has been chemically characterized by GC-MS. Fungal isolates were tested by a microdilution assay to achieve minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of both EOs and main components. The sensitivity of bacteria was evaluated by an agar disk diffusion. The results obtained show the feasibility of an integrate approach for an eco-friendly control of R. microplus by use of both entomopathogenic fungi and P. graveolens EO. L. hybrida could be an interesting alternative when B. bassiana is not employed. Conversely, a combined use of B. thuringiensis and EOs would not be advisable in the integrate control of ticks.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2018.00937/fullticksMetarhizium anisopliaeBeauveria bassianaBacillus thuringiensisProteus mirabilisessential oils
spellingShingle Simona Nardoni
Simona Nardoni
Valentina V. Ebani
Valentina V. Ebani
Carlo D’Ascenzi
Carlo D’Ascenzi
Luisa Pistelli
Luisa Pistelli
Francesca Mancianti
Francesca Mancianti
Sensitivity of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Plants Secondary Metabolites, for an Alternative Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cattle
Frontiers in Pharmacology
ticks
Metarhizium anisopliae
Beauveria bassiana
Bacillus thuringiensis
Proteus mirabilis
essential oils
title Sensitivity of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Plants Secondary Metabolites, for an Alternative Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cattle
title_full Sensitivity of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Plants Secondary Metabolites, for an Alternative Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cattle
title_fullStr Sensitivity of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Plants Secondary Metabolites, for an Alternative Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Plants Secondary Metabolites, for an Alternative Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cattle
title_short Sensitivity of Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Plants Secondary Metabolites, for an Alternative Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cattle
title_sort sensitivity of entomopathogenic fungi and bacteria to plants secondary metabolites for an alternative control of rhipicephalus boophilus microplus in cattle
topic ticks
Metarhizium anisopliae
Beauveria bassiana
Bacillus thuringiensis
Proteus mirabilis
essential oils
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2018.00937/full
work_keys_str_mv AT simonanardoni sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT simonanardoni sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT valentinavebani sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT valentinavebani sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT carlodascenzi sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT carlodascenzi sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT luisapistelli sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT luisapistelli sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT francescamancianti sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle
AT francescamancianti sensitivityofentomopathogenicfungiandbacteriatoplantssecondarymetabolitesforanalternativecontrolofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusincattle