The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem Solving

Findings of studies on the unique effects of reasoning and working memory regarding complex problem solving are inconsistent. To find out if these inconsistencies are due to a lack of symmetry between the studies, we reconsidered the findings of three published studies on this issue, which resulted...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra Zech, Markus Bühner, Stephan Kröner, Moritz Heene, Sven Hilbert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-05-01
Series:Journal of Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/2/22
_version_ 1818320062971379712
author Alexandra Zech
Markus Bühner
Stephan Kröner
Moritz Heene
Sven Hilbert
author_facet Alexandra Zech
Markus Bühner
Stephan Kröner
Moritz Heene
Sven Hilbert
author_sort Alexandra Zech
collection DOAJ
description Findings of studies on the unique effects of reasoning and working memory regarding complex problem solving are inconsistent. To find out if these inconsistencies are due to a lack of symmetry between the studies, we reconsidered the findings of three published studies on this issue, which resulted in conflicting conclusions regarding the inter-relations between reasoning, working memory, and complex problem solving. This was achieved by analysing so far unpublished problem solving data from the study of Bühner, Krumm, Ziegler, and Plücken (2006) (N= 124). One of the three published studies indicated unique effects of working memory and reasoning on complex problem solving using aggregated scores, a second study found no unique contribution of working memory using only figural scores, and a third study reported a unique influence only for reasoning using only numerical scores. Our data featured an evaluation of differences across content facets and levels of aggregation of the working memory scores. Path models showed that the results of the first study could not be replicated using content aggregated scores; the results of the second study could be replicated if only figural scores were used, and the results of the third study could be obtained by using only numerical scores. For verbal content, none of the published results could be replicated. This leads to the assumption that not only symmetry is an issue when correlating non-symmetrical data, but that content also has to be taken into account when comparing different studies on the same topic.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:19:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-87a87c942c314083892ef953dcc42059
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-3200
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:19:03Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Intelligence
spelling doaj.art-87a87c942c314083892ef953dcc420592022-12-21T23:51:14ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002017-05-01522210.3390/jintelligence5020022jintelligence5020022The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem SolvingAlexandra Zech0Markus Bühner1Stephan Kröner2Moritz Heene3Sven Hilbert4Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, 80336 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80802 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Education, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 90478 Nuremberg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80802 Munich, GermanyFaculty of Psychology, Educational Science, and Sport Science, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyFindings of studies on the unique effects of reasoning and working memory regarding complex problem solving are inconsistent. To find out if these inconsistencies are due to a lack of symmetry between the studies, we reconsidered the findings of three published studies on this issue, which resulted in conflicting conclusions regarding the inter-relations between reasoning, working memory, and complex problem solving. This was achieved by analysing so far unpublished problem solving data from the study of Bühner, Krumm, Ziegler, and Plücken (2006) (N= 124). One of the three published studies indicated unique effects of working memory and reasoning on complex problem solving using aggregated scores, a second study found no unique contribution of working memory using only figural scores, and a third study reported a unique influence only for reasoning using only numerical scores. Our data featured an evaluation of differences across content facets and levels of aggregation of the working memory scores. Path models showed that the results of the first study could not be replicated using content aggregated scores; the results of the second study could be replicated if only figural scores were used, and the results of the third study could be obtained by using only numerical scores. For verbal content, none of the published results could be replicated. This leads to the assumption that not only symmetry is an issue when correlating non-symmetrical data, but that content also has to be taken into account when comparing different studies on the same topic.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/2/22symmetrycontentworking memoryreasoningcomplex problem solvingMultiFlux
spellingShingle Alexandra Zech
Markus Bühner
Stephan Kröner
Moritz Heene
Sven Hilbert
The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem Solving
Journal of Intelligence
symmetry
content
working memory
reasoning
complex problem solving
MultiFlux
title The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem Solving
title_full The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem Solving
title_fullStr The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem Solving
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem Solving
title_short The Impact of Symmetry: Explaining Contradictory Results Concerning Working Memory, Reasoning, and Complex Problem Solving
title_sort impact of symmetry explaining contradictory results concerning working memory reasoning and complex problem solving
topic symmetry
content
working memory
reasoning
complex problem solving
MultiFlux
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/2/22
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrazech theimpactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT markusbuhner theimpactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT stephankroner theimpactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT moritzheene theimpactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT svenhilbert theimpactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT alexandrazech impactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT markusbuhner impactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT stephankroner impactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT moritzheene impactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving
AT svenhilbert impactofsymmetryexplainingcontradictoryresultsconcerningworkingmemoryreasoningandcomplexproblemsolving