Comparative Evaluation of RLEP-PCR and Conventional Laboratory Methods for Confirmation of Clinically Diagnosed Early-stage Leprosy in Eastern India

Introduction: Leprosy is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae). Diagnosis of leprosy is confirmed based on cardinal signs and symptoms along with supportive laboratory investigations. Early diagnosis and treatment of new cases are essential to prevent disease burden and sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rojalini Das, Dharitri Mohapatra, Rakesh Kumar Panda, Swapna Jena, Gopal Krishna Purohit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd. 2023-01-01
Series:National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://njlm.net/article_FULLTEXT.aspx?issn=0973-709x&year=2023&month=January&volume=12&issue=1&page=MO01%20-%20MO05&id=2686
_version_ 1797946917687132160
author Rojalini Das
Dharitri Mohapatra
Rakesh Kumar Panda
Swapna Jena
Gopal Krishna Purohit
author_facet Rojalini Das
Dharitri Mohapatra
Rakesh Kumar Panda
Swapna Jena
Gopal Krishna Purohit
author_sort Rojalini Das
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Leprosy is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae). Diagnosis of leprosy is confirmed based on cardinal signs and symptoms along with supportive laboratory investigations. Early diagnosis and treatment of new cases are essential to prevent disease burden and spread in community. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of currently available laboratory tests like M.leprae-specific repetitive element Polymerase Chain Reaction (RLEP-PCR) and conventional methods like, Slit Skin Smears (SSS), Histopathology (HP) and Fite-Faraco (FF) staining for detection of M. leprae in clinically diagnosed cases of early- stage leprosy. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study of 82 newly diagnosed cases of leprosy was carried out in S.C.B Medical College, a tertiary care hospital of Odisha, India from September 2018 to August 2020. For every case, skin tissue was punched out to get biopsy for HP and FF staining and incised for SSS. At least two SSS slides were prepared per case. One SSS slide was stained by modified Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining to demonstrate Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB). The other SSS slide was air dried and the dried material was scraped off to perform PCR. Data were analysed by Statistics software IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 24.0. Association between categorical variables was studied by using Chi-square test. Comparison of mean±SD and median (IQR) were done by using independent sample‘t’ test. Agreement on different types of laboratory methods was done by using Kappa test. Results: Among 82 cases, 68.3% were RLEP-PCR positive, 56% had relevant chronic granulomatous features histopathologically, 39% were FF stain positive, and only 29% were ZN stain positive. Improvement in case detection of 39%, 29.3%, and 12.2% by PCR over SSS, FF Stain and HP respectively proved superiority of PCR over other procedures. Conclusion: PCR was most sensitive to detect leprosy both in pauci and multibacillary groups, thus considered as investigation of choice for diagnosis of early-stage leprosy.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T21:19:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-87aab5afd08e48a98d47f35b24a732be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2277-8551
2455-6882
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T21:19:46Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
spelling doaj.art-87aab5afd08e48a98d47f35b24a732be2023-01-20T07:26:20ZengJCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.National Journal of Laboratory Medicine2277-85512455-68822023-01-01121MO01MO0510.7860/NJLM/2023/59409.2686Comparative Evaluation of RLEP-PCR and Conventional Laboratory Methods for Confirmation of Clinically Diagnosed Early-stage Leprosy in Eastern IndiaRojalini Das0Dharitri Mohapatra1Rakesh Kumar Panda2Swapna Jena3Gopal Krishna Purohit4Postgraduate Resident, Department of Microbiology, FMMCH, Balasore, Odisha, India.Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, SJMCH, Puri, Odisha, India.Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, BBMCH, Balangir, Odisha, India.Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, SCBMCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India.Scientist, Department of Molecular Biology, Heredity Biosciences ltd, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. Introduction: Leprosy is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae). Diagnosis of leprosy is confirmed based on cardinal signs and symptoms along with supportive laboratory investigations. Early diagnosis and treatment of new cases are essential to prevent disease burden and spread in community. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of currently available laboratory tests like M.leprae-specific repetitive element Polymerase Chain Reaction (RLEP-PCR) and conventional methods like, Slit Skin Smears (SSS), Histopathology (HP) and Fite-Faraco (FF) staining for detection of M. leprae in clinically diagnosed cases of early- stage leprosy. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study of 82 newly diagnosed cases of leprosy was carried out in S.C.B Medical College, a tertiary care hospital of Odisha, India from September 2018 to August 2020. For every case, skin tissue was punched out to get biopsy for HP and FF staining and incised for SSS. At least two SSS slides were prepared per case. One SSS slide was stained by modified Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining to demonstrate Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB). The other SSS slide was air dried and the dried material was scraped off to perform PCR. Data were analysed by Statistics software IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 24.0. Association between categorical variables was studied by using Chi-square test. Comparison of mean±SD and median (IQR) were done by using independent sample‘t’ test. Agreement on different types of laboratory methods was done by using Kappa test. Results: Among 82 cases, 68.3% were RLEP-PCR positive, 56% had relevant chronic granulomatous features histopathologically, 39% were FF stain positive, and only 29% were ZN stain positive. Improvement in case detection of 39%, 29.3%, and 12.2% by PCR over SSS, FF Stain and HP respectively proved superiority of PCR over other procedures. Conclusion: PCR was most sensitive to detect leprosy both in pauci and multibacillary groups, thus considered as investigation of choice for diagnosis of early-stage leprosy.https://njlm.net/article_FULLTEXT.aspx?issn=0973-709x&year=2023&month=January&volume=12&issue=1&page=MO01%20-%20MO05&id=2686fite faracco staininghistopathologyleprae-specific repetitive element-polymerase chain reactionslit skin smear
spellingShingle Rojalini Das
Dharitri Mohapatra
Rakesh Kumar Panda
Swapna Jena
Gopal Krishna Purohit
Comparative Evaluation of RLEP-PCR and Conventional Laboratory Methods for Confirmation of Clinically Diagnosed Early-stage Leprosy in Eastern India
National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
fite faracco staining
histopathology
leprae-specific repetitive element-polymerase chain reaction
slit skin smear
title Comparative Evaluation of RLEP-PCR and Conventional Laboratory Methods for Confirmation of Clinically Diagnosed Early-stage Leprosy in Eastern India
title_full Comparative Evaluation of RLEP-PCR and Conventional Laboratory Methods for Confirmation of Clinically Diagnosed Early-stage Leprosy in Eastern India
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of RLEP-PCR and Conventional Laboratory Methods for Confirmation of Clinically Diagnosed Early-stage Leprosy in Eastern India
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of RLEP-PCR and Conventional Laboratory Methods for Confirmation of Clinically Diagnosed Early-stage Leprosy in Eastern India
title_short Comparative Evaluation of RLEP-PCR and Conventional Laboratory Methods for Confirmation of Clinically Diagnosed Early-stage Leprosy in Eastern India
title_sort comparative evaluation of rlep pcr and conventional laboratory methods for confirmation of clinically diagnosed early stage leprosy in eastern india
topic fite faracco staining
histopathology
leprae-specific repetitive element-polymerase chain reaction
slit skin smear
url https://njlm.net/article_FULLTEXT.aspx?issn=0973-709x&year=2023&month=January&volume=12&issue=1&page=MO01%20-%20MO05&id=2686
work_keys_str_mv AT rojalinidas comparativeevaluationofrleppcrandconventionallaboratorymethodsforconfirmationofclinicallydiagnosedearlystageleprosyineasternindia
AT dharitrimohapatra comparativeevaluationofrleppcrandconventionallaboratorymethodsforconfirmationofclinicallydiagnosedearlystageleprosyineasternindia
AT rakeshkumarpanda comparativeevaluationofrleppcrandconventionallaboratorymethodsforconfirmationofclinicallydiagnosedearlystageleprosyineasternindia
AT swapnajena comparativeevaluationofrleppcrandconventionallaboratorymethodsforconfirmationofclinicallydiagnosedearlystageleprosyineasternindia
AT gopalkrishnapurohit comparativeevaluationofrleppcrandconventionallaboratorymethodsforconfirmationofclinicallydiagnosedearlystageleprosyineasternindia