Analysis of Different Interpolation Methods for Soil Moisture Mapping Using Field Measurements and Remotely Sensed Data

In this research, we comparatively analyzed different interpolation methods to create soil moisture maps by using field measurements and remotely sensed data. Impacts of number and distribution of field measurements on interpolation procedure was also investigated. Soil moisture measurements of 36...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehmet Zeki İmamoğlu, Elif Sertel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IJEGEO 2016-12-01
Series:International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/294322
_version_ 1797923485470687232
author Mehmet Zeki İmamoğlu
Elif Sertel
author_facet Mehmet Zeki İmamoğlu
Elif Sertel
author_sort Mehmet Zeki İmamoğlu
collection DOAJ
description In this research, we comparatively analyzed different interpolation methods to create soil moisture maps by using field measurements and remotely sensed data. Impacts of number and distribution of field measurements on interpolation procedure was also investigated. Soil moisture measurements of 36 different locations collected from Büyükçekmece water basin and RADARSAT-1 image of the same region obtained simultaneously on 2nd of September 2010 to create soil moisture maps of the study region. Locations of 36 field measurement points were selected considering land use/cover, soil type, elevation, spatial distribution and accessibility to transportation lines. 25 of sample points were used as Control Points (CPs) and used for soil moisture map creation and 11 of them were reserved and used as Independent Check Points (ICPs) to validate the accuracy of each approach applied. Two different experiments were conducted with 25 and 15 CPs to analyze the impact of number and spatial distribution on interpolation. Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Global Polynominal Interpolation (GPI), Local Polynominal Interpolation (LPI), Radial Basis Functions (RBF), Kriging, Cokriging and regeression methods were applied to different combination of data sets to create soil moisture maps and obtained results were compared.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T14:46:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-87c3a9c4ec2b47468c26ac38ef10f6b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2148-9173
2148-9173
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T14:46:55Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher IJEGEO
record_format Article
series International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics
spelling doaj.art-87c3a9c4ec2b47468c26ac38ef10f6b62023-02-15T16:07:51ZengIJEGEOInternational Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics2148-91732148-91732016-12-0133112510.30897/ijegeo.306477Analysis of Different Interpolation Methods for Soil Moisture Mapping Using Field Measurements and Remotely Sensed DataMehmet Zeki İmamoğlu0Elif Sertel1Istanbul Technical University, Science and Technology Institute, Geomatics Engineering Programme, Maslak, İstanbuIstanbul Technical University, Civil Engineering Faculty, Geomatics Engineering Department, Maslak, İstanbul. In this research, we comparatively analyzed different interpolation methods to create soil moisture maps by using field measurements and remotely sensed data. Impacts of number and distribution of field measurements on interpolation procedure was also investigated. Soil moisture measurements of 36 different locations collected from Büyükçekmece water basin and RADARSAT-1 image of the same region obtained simultaneously on 2nd of September 2010 to create soil moisture maps of the study region. Locations of 36 field measurement points were selected considering land use/cover, soil type, elevation, spatial distribution and accessibility to transportation lines. 25 of sample points were used as Control Points (CPs) and used for soil moisture map creation and 11 of them were reserved and used as Independent Check Points (ICPs) to validate the accuracy of each approach applied. Two different experiments were conducted with 25 and 15 CPs to analyze the impact of number and spatial distribution on interpolation. Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Global Polynominal Interpolation (GPI), Local Polynominal Interpolation (LPI), Radial Basis Functions (RBF), Kriging, Cokriging and regeression methods were applied to different combination of data sets to create soil moisture maps and obtained results were compared.http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/294322GeoistatisticGISInterpolationRadarsat-1Soil Moisture
spellingShingle Mehmet Zeki İmamoğlu
Elif Sertel
Analysis of Different Interpolation Methods for Soil Moisture Mapping Using Field Measurements and Remotely Sensed Data
International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics
Geoistatistic
GIS
Interpolation
Radarsat-1
Soil Moisture
title Analysis of Different Interpolation Methods for Soil Moisture Mapping Using Field Measurements and Remotely Sensed Data
title_full Analysis of Different Interpolation Methods for Soil Moisture Mapping Using Field Measurements and Remotely Sensed Data
title_fullStr Analysis of Different Interpolation Methods for Soil Moisture Mapping Using Field Measurements and Remotely Sensed Data
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Different Interpolation Methods for Soil Moisture Mapping Using Field Measurements and Remotely Sensed Data
title_short Analysis of Different Interpolation Methods for Soil Moisture Mapping Using Field Measurements and Remotely Sensed Data
title_sort analysis of different interpolation methods for soil moisture mapping using field measurements and remotely sensed data
topic Geoistatistic
GIS
Interpolation
Radarsat-1
Soil Moisture
url http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/294322
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmetzekiimamoglu analysisofdifferentinterpolationmethodsforsoilmoisturemappingusingfieldmeasurementsandremotelysenseddata
AT elifsertel analysisofdifferentinterpolationmethodsforsoilmoisturemappingusingfieldmeasurementsandremotelysenseddata