Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons
John Woods and Brent Hudak’s theory on arguments by analogy (1989), although correct in its meta-argumentative approach, gives rise to problems when we consider the possibility of weighing reasons. I contend that this is an outcome of construing the relationship between the premises and the conclus...
Main Author: | José Alhambra |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/7143 |
Similar Items
-
On Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments for Persuasive Reasoning
by: Teeradaj Racharak, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Feldman`s Reason and Argument
by: Francis W. Dauer
Published: (1994-01-01) -
Argumentation, Arguing, and Arguments: Comments on Giving Reasons
by: John Biro, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01) -
Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies
by: Cristián Santibáñez Yáñez
Published: (2012-03-01) -
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments
by: Yanlin Liao
Published: (2024-03-01)