Is Oscar Del Barco a perverse man?

<p class="first" id="d133198e93">This article seeks to contextualise the ‘Heideggerian’ or destructive critique against Lenin in the 1980s. The hypothesis I develop is based on Oscar Del Barco’s critique against Leninism and on the theoretical moment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oscar Ariel Cabezas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2021-09-01
Series:Radical Americas
Online Access:https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ra.2021.v6.1.19
_version_ 1797896342493724672
author Oscar Ariel Cabezas
author_facet Oscar Ariel Cabezas
author_sort Oscar Ariel Cabezas
collection DOAJ
description <p class="first" id="d133198e93">This article seeks to contextualise the ‘Heideggerian’ or destructive critique against Lenin in the 1980s. The hypothesis I develop is based on Oscar Del Barco’s critique against Leninism and on the theoretical moments in which this critique has been resisted by other Latin American thinkers. Del Barco is one of the leading philosophers in Latin America. His extraordinary effectiveness reconstructs the history and thought of the Bolshevik leader in order to abandon the leader’s enlightened programme. I argue that the demonisation of Lenin and the complex relationship with a demand for the authenticity of the Bolsheviks’ original project leads the philosopher to omit the birth or the genealogy of extreme liberalism or neoliberalism. The demonisation of Lenin and the omission of the historical context in which he writes makes Del Barco’s philosophy a propitious place for the neutralisation of the relationship between politics and emancipatory programmes. This hypothesis is confronted with the resistance of authors such as Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, García Linera, Bolívar Echeverría, Dominico Losurdo, Marta Harnecker and Tomás Moulian, among others. The article concludes by affirming that the Leninism reloaded by these authors constitutes a ‘toolbox’ for thinking the conflictive and never-finished relationship between politics and emancipation. </p>
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:40:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-87cc4f9284114ded8e9ce6d672be2de3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-4606
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:40:07Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher UCL Press
record_format Article
series Radical Americas
spelling doaj.art-87cc4f9284114ded8e9ce6d672be2de32023-02-23T11:48:00ZengUCL PressRadical Americas2399-46062021-09-0164310.14324/111.444.ra.2021.v6.1.19Is Oscar Del Barco a perverse man?Oscar Ariel Cabezas<p class="first" id="d133198e93">This article seeks to contextualise the ‘Heideggerian’ or destructive critique against Lenin in the 1980s. The hypothesis I develop is based on Oscar Del Barco’s critique against Leninism and on the theoretical moments in which this critique has been resisted by other Latin American thinkers. Del Barco is one of the leading philosophers in Latin America. His extraordinary effectiveness reconstructs the history and thought of the Bolshevik leader in order to abandon the leader’s enlightened programme. I argue that the demonisation of Lenin and the complex relationship with a demand for the authenticity of the Bolsheviks’ original project leads the philosopher to omit the birth or the genealogy of extreme liberalism or neoliberalism. The demonisation of Lenin and the omission of the historical context in which he writes makes Del Barco’s philosophy a propitious place for the neutralisation of the relationship between politics and emancipatory programmes. This hypothesis is confronted with the resistance of authors such as Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, García Linera, Bolívar Echeverría, Dominico Losurdo, Marta Harnecker and Tomás Moulian, among others. The article concludes by affirming that the Leninism reloaded by these authors constitutes a ‘toolbox’ for thinking the conflictive and never-finished relationship between politics and emancipation. </p>https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ra.2021.v6.1.19
spellingShingle Oscar Ariel Cabezas
Is Oscar Del Barco a perverse man?
Radical Americas
title Is Oscar Del Barco a perverse man?
title_full Is Oscar Del Barco a perverse man?
title_fullStr Is Oscar Del Barco a perverse man?
title_full_unstemmed Is Oscar Del Barco a perverse man?
title_short Is Oscar Del Barco a perverse man?
title_sort is oscar del barco a perverse man
url https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ra.2021.v6.1.19
work_keys_str_mv AT oscararielcabezas isoscardelbarcoaperverseman