Impact of Chill and Heat Exposures under Diverse Climatic Conditions on Peach and Nectarine Flowering Phenology

The present study aims to generalize cultivar-specific tree phenology responses to winter and spring temperatures and assess the effectiveness of the Tabuenca test and various chill and heat accumulation models in predicting bloom dates for a wide range of climatic conditions and years. To this end,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pavlina Drogoudi, Celia M. Cantín, Federica Brandi, Ana Butcaru, José Cos-Terrer, Marcello Cutuli, Stefano Foschi, Alejandro Galindo, Jesus García-Brunton, Eike Luedeling, María Angeles Moreno, Davide Nari, Georgios Pantelidis, Gemma Reig, Valentina Roera, Julien Ruesch, Florin Stanica, Daniela Giovannini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/12/3/584
_version_ 1827759634958516224
author Pavlina Drogoudi
Celia M. Cantín
Federica Brandi
Ana Butcaru
José Cos-Terrer
Marcello Cutuli
Stefano Foschi
Alejandro Galindo
Jesus García-Brunton
Eike Luedeling
María Angeles Moreno
Davide Nari
Georgios Pantelidis
Gemma Reig
Valentina Roera
Julien Ruesch
Florin Stanica
Daniela Giovannini
author_facet Pavlina Drogoudi
Celia M. Cantín
Federica Brandi
Ana Butcaru
José Cos-Terrer
Marcello Cutuli
Stefano Foschi
Alejandro Galindo
Jesus García-Brunton
Eike Luedeling
María Angeles Moreno
Davide Nari
Georgios Pantelidis
Gemma Reig
Valentina Roera
Julien Ruesch
Florin Stanica
Daniela Giovannini
author_sort Pavlina Drogoudi
collection DOAJ
description The present study aims to generalize cultivar-specific tree phenology responses to winter and spring temperatures and assess the effectiveness of the Tabuenca test and various chill and heat accumulation models in predicting bloom dates for a wide range of climatic conditions and years. To this end, we estimated the dates of rest completion and blooming and correlated them with observed bloom dates for 14 peach and nectarine cultivars that were evaluated in 11 locations across Europe (Greece, France, Italy, Romania and Spain), within the EUFRIN cultivar testing trial network. Chill accumulation varied considerably among the studied sites, ranging from 45 Chill Portions (CP) in Murcia-Torre Pacheco (Spain) to 97–98 CP in Cuneo (Italy) and Bucharest (Romania). Rest completion occurred latest or was not achieved at all for some cultivars in the southern sites in Murcia. Dormancy release happened earliest in Bucharest and Cuneo, sites where heat accumulation had a strong influence on the regulation of bloom time. Blooming occurred earliest in the moderately cold regions of Lleida (Spain) and Bellegarde (France), and 7–11 days later in the warmer locations of Rome (Italy) and Naoussa (Greece), suggesting that bloom timing is strongly influenced by delayed rest completion in these locations. The Dynamic Model resulted in both more homogeneous chill accumulation across years and better predictions of bloom dates, compared with the Utah, Positive Utah and Chilling Hours models. Prediction of bloom dates was less successful for low-chill cultivars than for medium- and high-chill cultivars. Further climatic and experimental data are needed to make estimates of the climatic needs of peach cultivars more robust and to generate reliable advice for enhancing the resilience of peach production under varying and changing climatic conditions.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:29:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-87fa878bc91d425b8f34930088eaa7e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-7747
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:29:32Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Plants
spelling doaj.art-87fa878bc91d425b8f34930088eaa7e52023-11-16T17:44:30ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472023-01-0112358410.3390/plants12030584Impact of Chill and Heat Exposures under Diverse Climatic Conditions on Peach and Nectarine Flowering PhenologyPavlina Drogoudi0Celia M. Cantín1Federica Brandi2Ana Butcaru3José Cos-Terrer4Marcello Cutuli5Stefano Foschi6Alejandro Galindo7Jesus García-Brunton8Eike Luedeling9María Angeles Moreno10Davide Nari11Georgios Pantelidis12Gemma Reig13Valentina Roera14Julien Ruesch15Florin Stanica16Daniela Giovannini17Department of Deciduous Fruit Trees, Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization (ELGO)-‘DIMITRA’, 59200 Naoussa, GreeceDepartment of Pomology, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (EEAD), CSIC, 50059 Zaragoza, SpainResearch Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 47121 Forlì, ItalyResearch Centre for Study of Food and Agricultural Products Quality, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 011464 Bucharest, RomaniaInstituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario (IMIDA), 30150 Murcia, SpainResearch Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 00134 Rome, ItalyRinova Soc. Coop., 47522 Cesena, ItalyInstituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario (IMIDA), 30150 Murcia, SpainInstituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario (IMIDA), 30150 Murcia, SpainInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES)–Horticultural Sciences, University of Bonn, 53121 Bonn, GermanyDepartment of Pomology, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (EEAD), CSIC, 50059 Zaragoza, SpainFondazione ricerca, Innovazione e Sviluppo Tecnologico Dell’agricoltura Piemontese, AGRION, 12030 Manta, ItalyDepartment of Deciduous Fruit Trees, Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization (ELGO)-‘DIMITRA’, 59200 Naoussa, GreeceFruitcentre, Fruit Production Department, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), 25003 Lleida, SpainFondazione ricerca, Innovazione e Sviluppo Tecnologico Dell’agricoltura Piemontese, AGRION, 12030 Manta, ItalyCentre Technique Interprofessionel des Fruits et Légumes (CTIFL), 30127 Bellegarde, FranceResearch Centre for Study of Food and Agricultural Products Quality, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 011464 Bucharest, RomaniaResearch Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 47121 Forlì, ItalyThe present study aims to generalize cultivar-specific tree phenology responses to winter and spring temperatures and assess the effectiveness of the Tabuenca test and various chill and heat accumulation models in predicting bloom dates for a wide range of climatic conditions and years. To this end, we estimated the dates of rest completion and blooming and correlated them with observed bloom dates for 14 peach and nectarine cultivars that were evaluated in 11 locations across Europe (Greece, France, Italy, Romania and Spain), within the EUFRIN cultivar testing trial network. Chill accumulation varied considerably among the studied sites, ranging from 45 Chill Portions (CP) in Murcia-Torre Pacheco (Spain) to 97–98 CP in Cuneo (Italy) and Bucharest (Romania). Rest completion occurred latest or was not achieved at all for some cultivars in the southern sites in Murcia. Dormancy release happened earliest in Bucharest and Cuneo, sites where heat accumulation had a strong influence on the regulation of bloom time. Blooming occurred earliest in the moderately cold regions of Lleida (Spain) and Bellegarde (France), and 7–11 days later in the warmer locations of Rome (Italy) and Naoussa (Greece), suggesting that bloom timing is strongly influenced by delayed rest completion in these locations. The Dynamic Model resulted in both more homogeneous chill accumulation across years and better predictions of bloom dates, compared with the Utah, Positive Utah and Chilling Hours models. Prediction of bloom dates was less successful for low-chill cultivars than for medium- and high-chill cultivars. Further climatic and experimental data are needed to make estimates of the climatic needs of peach cultivars more robust and to generate reliable advice for enhancing the resilience of peach production under varying and changing climatic conditions.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/12/3/584resiliencechilling requirementheat requirement<i>Prunus persica</i>
spellingShingle Pavlina Drogoudi
Celia M. Cantín
Federica Brandi
Ana Butcaru
José Cos-Terrer
Marcello Cutuli
Stefano Foschi
Alejandro Galindo
Jesus García-Brunton
Eike Luedeling
María Angeles Moreno
Davide Nari
Georgios Pantelidis
Gemma Reig
Valentina Roera
Julien Ruesch
Florin Stanica
Daniela Giovannini
Impact of Chill and Heat Exposures under Diverse Climatic Conditions on Peach and Nectarine Flowering Phenology
Plants
resilience
chilling requirement
heat requirement
<i>Prunus persica</i>
title Impact of Chill and Heat Exposures under Diverse Climatic Conditions on Peach and Nectarine Flowering Phenology
title_full Impact of Chill and Heat Exposures under Diverse Climatic Conditions on Peach and Nectarine Flowering Phenology
title_fullStr Impact of Chill and Heat Exposures under Diverse Climatic Conditions on Peach and Nectarine Flowering Phenology
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Chill and Heat Exposures under Diverse Climatic Conditions on Peach and Nectarine Flowering Phenology
title_short Impact of Chill and Heat Exposures under Diverse Climatic Conditions on Peach and Nectarine Flowering Phenology
title_sort impact of chill and heat exposures under diverse climatic conditions on peach and nectarine flowering phenology
topic resilience
chilling requirement
heat requirement
<i>Prunus persica</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/12/3/584
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlinadrogoudi impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT celiamcantin impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT federicabrandi impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT anabutcaru impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT josecosterrer impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT marcellocutuli impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT stefanofoschi impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT alejandrogalindo impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT jesusgarciabrunton impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT eikeluedeling impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT mariaangelesmoreno impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT davidenari impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT georgiospantelidis impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT gemmareig impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT valentinaroera impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT julienruesch impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT florinstanica impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology
AT danielagiovannini impactofchillandheatexposuresunderdiverseclimaticconditionsonpeachandnectarinefloweringphenology