United States, Europe and Poland Different Stages of Antitrust Tying War in the New Economy

Microsoft’s case has led to heated debates, both in Europe and the United States of America, on the abuse of the dominant position and on the prohibition of tying. This discussion, both in Europe and the United States, is not finished. In this article the author presents legal implications of tying...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mariusz SWORA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca 2006-06-01
Series:Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/336
_version_ 1797262653848027136
author Mariusz SWORA
author_facet Mariusz SWORA
author_sort Mariusz SWORA
collection DOAJ
description Microsoft’s case has led to heated debates, both in Europe and the United States of America, on the abuse of the dominant position and on the prohibition of tying. This discussion, both in Europe and the United States, is not finished. In this article the author presents legal implications of tying products in Europe and Poland and confronts them with the American approach to tying. In Poland, a country with a fast developing economy, with the growing level of foreign investments, discussion on monopolist practices under the conditions of a fast technological development1 has not really commenced yet. The problems of innovation and development of New Economy undertakings has gained new impetus following Poland’s accession to the European Union. It is a matter of time when the anti-trust law begins to show interest in them. There are some indications that this has already taken place. In the first part of this article the author briefly presents the discussion related to Microsoft III case in the United States insofar as it pertains to New Economy issues. The second and third parts address legal and political aspects of the Microsoft case in the European Union. In the fourth part legal aspects related to tying practices in Poland are presented. The article aims to show that instrumental and mechanical treatment of tying practices used by firms having the market power under conditions of technological progress is not proper. The problem of antitrust analysis of such practices is universal, as universal as these practices are. However, the problem is solved differently in the United States and in Europe and the reasons for such a different approach are rooted in the legal system and policy enforcement. Microsoft antitrust is global. After US and European cases, Korean competition authority has found Microsoft guilty of tying practices2. Regarding Microsoft problems with tying it is necessary to ask the question whether tying practices are characteristic only to enterprises like Microsoft or constitute a general problem from the New Economy perspective. An important question here is (to paraphrase M. D. Bradley and D. W. Jansen)3: should we teach an old economy dog New Economy tricks?
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:48:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8814d64499f54482a5cc06da66001a37
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1842-2845
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:00:32Z
publishDate 2006-06-01
publisher Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca
record_format Article
series Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
spelling doaj.art-8814d64499f54482a5cc06da66001a372024-03-14T07:28:36ZengBabes-Bolyai University, Cluj-NapocaTransylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences1842-28452006-06-012178098352United States, Europe and Poland Different Stages of Antitrust Tying War in the New EconomyMariusz SWORA0PhD, Lecturer at the Faculty of Law and Administration, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, PolandMicrosoft’s case has led to heated debates, both in Europe and the United States of America, on the abuse of the dominant position and on the prohibition of tying. This discussion, both in Europe and the United States, is not finished. In this article the author presents legal implications of tying products in Europe and Poland and confronts them with the American approach to tying. In Poland, a country with a fast developing economy, with the growing level of foreign investments, discussion on monopolist practices under the conditions of a fast technological development1 has not really commenced yet. The problems of innovation and development of New Economy undertakings has gained new impetus following Poland’s accession to the European Union. It is a matter of time when the anti-trust law begins to show interest in them. There are some indications that this has already taken place. In the first part of this article the author briefly presents the discussion related to Microsoft III case in the United States insofar as it pertains to New Economy issues. The second and third parts address legal and political aspects of the Microsoft case in the European Union. In the fourth part legal aspects related to tying practices in Poland are presented. The article aims to show that instrumental and mechanical treatment of tying practices used by firms having the market power under conditions of technological progress is not proper. The problem of antitrust analysis of such practices is universal, as universal as these practices are. However, the problem is solved differently in the United States and in Europe and the reasons for such a different approach are rooted in the legal system and policy enforcement. Microsoft antitrust is global. After US and European cases, Korean competition authority has found Microsoft guilty of tying practices2. Regarding Microsoft problems with tying it is necessary to ask the question whether tying practices are characteristic only to enterprises like Microsoft or constitute a general problem from the New Economy perspective. An important question here is (to paraphrase M. D. Bradley and D. W. Jansen)3: should we teach an old economy dog New Economy tricks?https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/336microsofteconomytying warantitrustusatying practicespolicy
spellingShingle Mariusz SWORA
United States, Europe and Poland Different Stages of Antitrust Tying War in the New Economy
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
microsoft
economy
tying war
antitrust
usa
tying practices
policy
title United States, Europe and Poland Different Stages of Antitrust Tying War in the New Economy
title_full United States, Europe and Poland Different Stages of Antitrust Tying War in the New Economy
title_fullStr United States, Europe and Poland Different Stages of Antitrust Tying War in the New Economy
title_full_unstemmed United States, Europe and Poland Different Stages of Antitrust Tying War in the New Economy
title_short United States, Europe and Poland Different Stages of Antitrust Tying War in the New Economy
title_sort united states europe and poland different stages of antitrust tying war in the new economy
topic microsoft
economy
tying war
antitrust
usa
tying practices
policy
url https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/336
work_keys_str_mv AT mariuszswora unitedstateseuropeandpolanddifferentstagesofantitrusttyingwarintheneweconomy