No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London Connection

ABSTRACT In this review, I summarise the circumstances leading to the collaboration between London and Örebro on the basic research performed to study potential mechanisms underlying the improved patency of saphenous veins harvested by the no-touch technique. Histological studies reveal various form...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael R. Dashwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2022-09-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022001000002&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818065930513547264
author Michael R. Dashwood
author_facet Michael R. Dashwood
author_sort Michael R. Dashwood
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT In this review, I summarise the circumstances leading to the collaboration between London and Örebro on the basic research performed to study potential mechanisms underlying the improved patency of saphenous veins harvested by the no-touch technique. Histological studies reveal various forms of vascular damage to saphenous vein grafts harvested in conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) whereas no-touch grafts retain a normal architecture. The perivascular fat that remains intact on no-touch saphenous vein grafts seems to play a particularly important role as the “protector” of all layers of the graft. In addition, the perivascular fat is a source of adipose cell-derived factors that may contribute to the success of the no-touch technique. While a number of trials have compared no-touch with conventional grafts following CABG, these have generally been limited to short follow-up periods, low patient numbers, and inadequate histological data. When handling no-touch saphenous vein at harvesting, there is no direct contact of the vein by surgical instruments, spasm does not occur, and high-pressure intraluminal distension is not required. While damage to both endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells are evident at the microscopic and ultrastructural level in conventional saphenous vein grafts, their structure in no-touch grafts is preserved. Also, in no-touch veins, the vasa vasorum remains intact and transmural blood supply is maintained. This microvascular network is disrupted during conventional harvesting, a situation likely to stimulate processes involved in graft occlusion. The use of excess graft material for histology is to be encouraged for the assessment of vascular damage and even surgeon competence. If you don’t look, you don’t find.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T14:59:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-881cc6d216874caf904e4004f6a4fcfe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-9741
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T14:59:43Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
spelling doaj.art-881cc6d216874caf904e4004f6a4fcfe2022-12-22T01:44:13ZengSociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia CardiovascularBrazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery1678-97412022-09-0137spe11610.21470/1678-9741-2022-0024No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London ConnectionMichael R. Dashwoodhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2574-0390ABSTRACT In this review, I summarise the circumstances leading to the collaboration between London and Örebro on the basic research performed to study potential mechanisms underlying the improved patency of saphenous veins harvested by the no-touch technique. Histological studies reveal various forms of vascular damage to saphenous vein grafts harvested in conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) whereas no-touch grafts retain a normal architecture. The perivascular fat that remains intact on no-touch saphenous vein grafts seems to play a particularly important role as the “protector” of all layers of the graft. In addition, the perivascular fat is a source of adipose cell-derived factors that may contribute to the success of the no-touch technique. While a number of trials have compared no-touch with conventional grafts following CABG, these have generally been limited to short follow-up periods, low patient numbers, and inadequate histological data. When handling no-touch saphenous vein at harvesting, there is no direct contact of the vein by surgical instruments, spasm does not occur, and high-pressure intraluminal distension is not required. While damage to both endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells are evident at the microscopic and ultrastructural level in conventional saphenous vein grafts, their structure in no-touch grafts is preserved. Also, in no-touch veins, the vasa vasorum remains intact and transmural blood supply is maintained. This microvascular network is disrupted during conventional harvesting, a situation likely to stimulate processes involved in graft occlusion. The use of excess graft material for histology is to be encouraged for the assessment of vascular damage and even surgeon competence. If you don’t look, you don’t find.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022001000002&lng=en&tlng=enSaphenous VeinVascular DamageCoronary Artery BypassMicrovesselsMuscleSmoothVascularSurgical InstrumentsReview.
spellingShingle Michael R. Dashwood
No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London Connection
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Saphenous Vein
Vascular Damage
Coronary Artery Bypass
Microvessels
Muscle
Smooth
Vascular
Surgical Instruments
Review.
title No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London Connection
title_full No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London Connection
title_fullStr No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London Connection
title_full_unstemmed No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London Connection
title_short No-Touch Saphenous Vein - Vascular Damage and the London Connection
title_sort no touch saphenous vein vascular damage and the london connection
topic Saphenous Vein
Vascular Damage
Coronary Artery Bypass
Microvessels
Muscle
Smooth
Vascular
Surgical Instruments
Review.
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022001000002&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelrdashwood notouchsaphenousveinvasculardamageandthelondonconnection