Bridging the Gap between Bulk Compression and Indentation Test on Room-Temperature Plasticity in Oxides: Case Study on SrTiO<sub>3</sub>

Dislocation-based functionalities in inorganic ceramics and semiconductors are drawing increasing attention, contrasting the conventional belief that the majority of ceramic materials are brittle at room temperature. Understanding the dislocation behavior in ceramics and advanced semiconducting mate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xufei Fang, Lukas Porz, Kuan Ding, Atsutomo Nakamura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Crystals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/10/10/933
_version_ 1827704363455348736
author Xufei Fang
Lukas Porz
Kuan Ding
Atsutomo Nakamura
author_facet Xufei Fang
Lukas Porz
Kuan Ding
Atsutomo Nakamura
author_sort Xufei Fang
collection DOAJ
description Dislocation-based functionalities in inorganic ceramics and semiconductors are drawing increasing attention, contrasting the conventional belief that the majority of ceramic materials are brittle at room temperature. Understanding the dislocation behavior in ceramics and advanced semiconducting materials is therefore critical for the mechanical reliability of such materials and devices designed for harvesting the dislocation-based functionalities. Here we compare the mechanical testing between indentation at nano-/microscale and bulk uniaxial deformation at macroscale and highlight the dislocation plasticity in single crystal SrTiO<sub>3</sub>, a model perovskite. The similarities and differences as well as the advantages and limitations of both testing protocols are discussed based on the experimental outcome of the crystal plasticity, with a focus on the pre-existing defect population being probed with different volumes across the length scales (“size effect”). We expect this work to pave the road for studying dislocation-based plasticity in various advanced functional ceramics and semiconductors.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:38:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88224ee377a74ce79a67fb5beaafe94d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4352
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:38:40Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Crystals
spelling doaj.art-88224ee377a74ce79a67fb5beaafe94d2023-11-20T17:00:37ZengMDPI AGCrystals2073-43522020-10-01101093310.3390/cryst10100933Bridging the Gap between Bulk Compression and Indentation Test on Room-Temperature Plasticity in Oxides: Case Study on SrTiO<sub>3</sub>Xufei Fang0Lukas Porz1Kuan Ding2Atsutomo Nakamura3Department of Materials and Earth Sciences, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, GermanyDepartment of Materials and Earth Sciences, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, GermanyDepartment of Materials and Earth Sciences, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, GermanyDepartment of Materials Physics, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, JapanDislocation-based functionalities in inorganic ceramics and semiconductors are drawing increasing attention, contrasting the conventional belief that the majority of ceramic materials are brittle at room temperature. Understanding the dislocation behavior in ceramics and advanced semiconducting materials is therefore critical for the mechanical reliability of such materials and devices designed for harvesting the dislocation-based functionalities. Here we compare the mechanical testing between indentation at nano-/microscale and bulk uniaxial deformation at macroscale and highlight the dislocation plasticity in single crystal SrTiO<sub>3</sub>, a model perovskite. The similarities and differences as well as the advantages and limitations of both testing protocols are discussed based on the experimental outcome of the crystal plasticity, with a focus on the pre-existing defect population being probed with different volumes across the length scales (“size effect”). We expect this work to pave the road for studying dislocation-based plasticity in various advanced functional ceramics and semiconductors.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/10/10/933dislocation plasticityceramicsSrTiO<sub>3</sub>nanoindentationbulk deformation
spellingShingle Xufei Fang
Lukas Porz
Kuan Ding
Atsutomo Nakamura
Bridging the Gap between Bulk Compression and Indentation Test on Room-Temperature Plasticity in Oxides: Case Study on SrTiO<sub>3</sub>
Crystals
dislocation plasticity
ceramics
SrTiO<sub>3</sub>
nanoindentation
bulk deformation
title Bridging the Gap between Bulk Compression and Indentation Test on Room-Temperature Plasticity in Oxides: Case Study on SrTiO<sub>3</sub>
title_full Bridging the Gap between Bulk Compression and Indentation Test on Room-Temperature Plasticity in Oxides: Case Study on SrTiO<sub>3</sub>
title_fullStr Bridging the Gap between Bulk Compression and Indentation Test on Room-Temperature Plasticity in Oxides: Case Study on SrTiO<sub>3</sub>
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the Gap between Bulk Compression and Indentation Test on Room-Temperature Plasticity in Oxides: Case Study on SrTiO<sub>3</sub>
title_short Bridging the Gap between Bulk Compression and Indentation Test on Room-Temperature Plasticity in Oxides: Case Study on SrTiO<sub>3</sub>
title_sort bridging the gap between bulk compression and indentation test on room temperature plasticity in oxides case study on srtio sub 3 sub
topic dislocation plasticity
ceramics
SrTiO<sub>3</sub>
nanoindentation
bulk deformation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/10/10/933
work_keys_str_mv AT xufeifang bridgingthegapbetweenbulkcompressionandindentationtestonroomtemperatureplasticityinoxidescasestudyonsrtiosub3sub
AT lukasporz bridgingthegapbetweenbulkcompressionandindentationtestonroomtemperatureplasticityinoxidescasestudyonsrtiosub3sub
AT kuanding bridgingthegapbetweenbulkcompressionandindentationtestonroomtemperatureplasticityinoxidescasestudyonsrtiosub3sub
AT atsutomonakamura bridgingthegapbetweenbulkcompressionandindentationtestonroomtemperatureplasticityinoxidescasestudyonsrtiosub3sub