You say USMCA, or T-MEC and I say CUSMA: The New NAFTA – let’s call the whole thing ON
When U.S. President Donald Trump declared that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was the worst trade agreement ever, and threatened to rip it up, it seemed that the very foundations of the North American economy were about to be shaken up. Nor did it help matters that Trump pulled o...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Calgary
2020-04-01
|
| Series: | The School of Public Policy Publications |
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1831571458987393024 |
|---|---|
| author | Eugene Beaulieu Dylan Klemen |
| author_facet | Eugene Beaulieu Dylan Klemen |
| author_sort | Eugene Beaulieu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | When U.S. President Donald Trump declared that the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) was the worst trade agreement ever, and threatened to rip
it up, it seemed that the very foundations of the North American economy were
about to be shaken up. Nor did it help matters that Trump pulled out of the TransPacific Partnership (TPP), withdrew from the World Trade Organization (WTO)
and topped all that off by using aggressive trade tactics against major U.S. trade
partners like Canada, Mexico and China.
Fortunately, nothing of the sort happened, and the final, revised agreement,
recently ratified by Canada, will make incremental rather than earth-shattering
changes to free trade flows between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. Its biggest
contribution to the economy is that it puts an end to the uncertainty around the
investment climate caused by Trump’s actions.
The new NAFTA – referred to in Canada as the Canada-United States-Mexico
Agreement (CUSMA) – turned out not to be a game-changer. The old NAFTA,
which came into force in 1994, needed updating and its successor improves upon
it incrementally. Its economic impact is likely to be a modest one, but its benefits
for Western Canada are especially worth noting |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T13:09:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-883c0ec797af44aaae83c0acfcad15c5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2560-8312 2560-8320 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T13:09:14Z |
| publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
| publisher | University of Calgary |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The School of Public Policy Publications |
| spelling | doaj.art-883c0ec797af44aaae83c0acfcad15c52022-12-21T21:47:09ZengUniversity of CalgaryThe School of Public Policy Publications2560-83122560-83202020-04-0113711410.11575/sppp.v13i0.70040You say USMCA, or T-MEC and I say CUSMA: The New NAFTA – let’s call the whole thing ONEugene Beaulieu0Dylan Klemen1The School of Public PolicyThe School of Public PolicyWhen U.S. President Donald Trump declared that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was the worst trade agreement ever, and threatened to rip it up, it seemed that the very foundations of the North American economy were about to be shaken up. Nor did it help matters that Trump pulled out of the TransPacific Partnership (TPP), withdrew from the World Trade Organization (WTO) and topped all that off by using aggressive trade tactics against major U.S. trade partners like Canada, Mexico and China. Fortunately, nothing of the sort happened, and the final, revised agreement, recently ratified by Canada, will make incremental rather than earth-shattering changes to free trade flows between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. Its biggest contribution to the economy is that it puts an end to the uncertainty around the investment climate caused by Trump’s actions. The new NAFTA – referred to in Canada as the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) – turned out not to be a game-changer. The old NAFTA, which came into force in 1994, needed updating and its successor improves upon it incrementally. Its economic impact is likely to be a modest one, but its benefits for Western Canada are especially worth notingcusmanaftainternational trade |
| spellingShingle | Eugene Beaulieu Dylan Klemen You say USMCA, or T-MEC and I say CUSMA: The New NAFTA – let’s call the whole thing ON The School of Public Policy Publications cusma nafta international trade |
| title | You say USMCA, or T-MEC and I say CUSMA: The New NAFTA – let’s call the whole thing ON |
| title_full | You say USMCA, or T-MEC and I say CUSMA: The New NAFTA – let’s call the whole thing ON |
| title_fullStr | You say USMCA, or T-MEC and I say CUSMA: The New NAFTA – let’s call the whole thing ON |
| title_full_unstemmed | You say USMCA, or T-MEC and I say CUSMA: The New NAFTA – let’s call the whole thing ON |
| title_short | You say USMCA, or T-MEC and I say CUSMA: The New NAFTA – let’s call the whole thing ON |
| title_sort | you say usmca or t mec and i say cusma the new nafta let s call the whole thing on |
| topic | cusma nafta international trade |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eugenebeaulieu yousayusmcaortmecandisaycusmathenewnaftaletscallthewholethingon AT dylanklemen yousayusmcaortmecandisaycusmathenewnaftaletscallthewholethingon |